RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Nolby
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nolby



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Nolby


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

olympus_tg6Olympus Tough TG-6

Pros: build quality, original accessories available (additional, caps, filter support,..), live composit, RAW, aperture priority, use with OM-D apps, macros

Cons: image quality not at the top (noise, poor sharpness at major focal lengths, latitude exposure from mobile phone)

Opinion: A camera that has many pros but whose image quality has aspects that can be improved. I appreciate the possibility of mounting a cap that protects the lens (very useful outdoors) but the accessories dedicated to macro and underwater are not few. The firmware allows some goodies derived from the most advanced OM-D (live composit, focus stacking also in macro, procapture). The sensor and the small optics unfortunately carry with them limits that affect the final rendering of the image that is noisy even at low sensitivities; even the sharpness is not the best and you will soon start trying to avoid using the zoom. It is the only rugged able to work in priority of apertures (only 3 in reality but it is already a lot and considering the possibility of easily managing the exposure compensation in fact you have full control of the result) and also the only one to churn out RAW files although the possibilities of recovery of lights and shadows are much more limited than the larger sensors. A more accurate review I put here: www.marconolby.altervista.org/olympus-stylus-tough-tg-6/

sent on November 09, 2021


genesis_c3Genesis C3

Pros: Price, equipment (head BH34, carrycot, removable rubber feet to use the tips, monopod, short column, long column, otherwise mountable)

Cons: They tend to loosen all the mechanisms, even the screw that connects head and column with the risk of seeing the head fall with camera attached. It is Necessary to check periodically the tightening of all the screws

Opinion: I normally keep It in the car so I believe that the changes in temperature are the cause of continuous loosening in the mechanisms. The correct tightening of the head the control at every use for the joints of the legs must be tightened from time to time. The value for money is absolutely excellent, the product is very versatile and in a position to be resealed really manageable and not cumbersome. Moreover, in the price, very very competitive, are present all the options that you can hope from the bag with shoulder strap (padded and very protective) to the short column to get to the ground and obviously the screws for maintenance. I also Appreciate the fact that by removing the rubbers underneath there are the metallic tips.

sent on March 26, 2019


motorola_moto_e4_plusMotorola Moto E4 Plus

Pros: Battery life

Cons: Bad photographic side, Bluetooth every now and then does not hook up to the car

Opinion: Bought by a few months attracted by the performance/price ratio and especially the battery from 5000mah that guarantees a duration of even a couple of days if not too stressed. The screen looks with pleasure, beautiful colors and enough brightness in every light condition. Turning to the negative side, the Bluetooth often does not want to connect to the car or can not exchange the data in the Address Book. The internal camera has a good resolution and provides good sharpness files. Even with relatively poor light compensates well giving of JPEG in which the noise is not noticeable. The problem is the focus that often does not misfires even in conditions of optimum light, so it often happens to have to delete a photo because it is decidedly blurry. Even the slightest focusing distance seems much longer than that of other phones.

sent on August 22, 2018


pentax_k50Pentax K-50

Pros: double ring nut, tropicalised body, pentaprism viewfinder, AF fine adjustment, sensor stabilization

Cons: autofocus system does not live up to its competitors

Opinion: Purchased a year ago as a first non-automatic camera. Despite the competitors pariprezzo have some options that make them more attractive to a beginner (wi-fi, touch-screen, swivel screen, GPS) this is less equipped with frills but has all the features of a semi professional machine (double ring, a true pentaprism, magnesium body with a good 81 gaskets). Pentax does not produce SLR specifically for the entry level sector but proposes old bodies of a couple of generations at supermarket prices, those who look more at the substance than at the contour accessories will appreciate this philosophy. The only weak point is the autofocus system that is not really a lightning.rnPagata as a Canon 1300d, a year later I can not be satisfied. For now, there are no signs of problems with magnets.

sent on December 24, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me