|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
DiegoD www.juzaphoto.com/p/DiegoD  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 6D Pros: economic - FF - tropicalized Cons: AF - excluding center point Opinion: I've owned it for several years and it's never had a hitch even under a cloudburst/snow/freeze/sand. Eexpress a lover's thought not as a professional, there is a whole other pair of sleeves. What are the best photos I've taken... certainly not the ones done effortlessly... and by effortlessly I mean tip and snap with automatic settings, for that there is the smatphone that sure gives equally beautiful memories. From this comes the success of the 6D, not a machine that excels and did not even exceed at the exit, in anything, but a machine that allowed me to spend time in what I like: composition of the image, work on the exposure and think a little like you did once with the film, trying to take advantage of every click, fatigue gives satisfaction, limits are transmuted in occasions to exploit, this is the challenge that poses you the 6D, the challenge? Photography is changing and it seems to me that you prefer to go out, shoot burst photos and then invest time in posts, it's not what I like! Not that developing a photo isn't tiring, in fact for me it's almost a heartbreak... and that's why I love 6D, the files it returns are ready. I like to relax photographing and the slow 6D works like this. in some ways and here "sacrilege" a bit like a Leica. If you like what I like about photography this machine will always please you, if you love working on the photos in the post you will definitely find much better in everything. sent on March 24, 2020 |
 | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: compact - cheap - macro function Cons: AF not quite lightning for me Opinion: If it is true that I am a troublemaker it is also true that if used as normal the AF works well not like the nano-usm but okay, the problems come when you switch to the macro function that some problem at least on my model gives it in finding the point of fire. Otherwise nothing to say, perfect. Surrender does not disappoint is a must have sent on March 20, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Pros: Compact - AF fast - blurry Cons: Tropicalization Opinion: If this project has not been updated or changed there are 2 reasons: the first is the fact that the lens does more than excellently its duty as it is, the second is that although it is not perfect, it represents a bright fixed at ridiculous costs (for the focal FF) usable in all excluding architecture. It may not be monstrous at the corners, but it certainly has a pleasant yield and blurry one. if I had to give a definition I'd say it's a Canon. And by that I mean that it's a lens whose photos stand out, have character and personality, are not sharp at the edges and do not even have any distortion, but the outcome is pleasant. It generates poetry and atmosphere as long as you devote time to it. Beautiful focal on aps-c sent on March 20, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 28-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: construction - focal excursion - solidity Cons: weight and light Opinion: Optics I had for a couple of years in my kit, slightly cooler in yield than the various 24-70. What to say, a professional lens and on the full frame sensor from the maximum. I found it extremely correct and sharp at all focal points and diaphragms, especially from 4 and up. It is worth the expense and for the costs it has in the used market almost I buy it back. Obviously it has the defect of a doublet that on some specimens dulls, not on mine fortunately, and the fact that spare parts are impossible. sent on March 20, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Lightness, blurry, sharp, autofocus. Cons: Whiteness Opinion: I will do a particular review, approving everything already said in previous reviews. It's all true, for what it costs it's crazy not to have it in the kit even if you only use it once. Now you will understand why my review is strange... in my 20 years of photography when I had this optics I was looking for more... plus f, more mm, more stabilization... more discretion.... and then I was selling this optics For the counterpart f2,8 or for the 70-300 is or for the 70-300 do. or for the 100-400, in short never happy... you want to know the result... Now the 70-200 f4 l usm is in my kit... others... ?. The use I make of it is strange... maybe: he caught up and birdwithes with the multiplier 2x, this thanks to the R that allows me to focus fearlessly at f11 and if there is The sun even at f16. Am I crazy? Maybe so, but I hope it will make you understand what this lens is to me at least. sent on August 27, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Bright, f2.8 row resistance and tropicalization Cons: Size Opinion: Of this lens I have heard of each: it is pasty is inaccurate distorts a lot, the brother f4 is much better... etc. I have had it and loved it for many years for the following reasons: I love industrial photography and therefore I have often found myself shooting in the dark, I love the landscape and I love the Street, especially at night. I tried brother is f4, beautiful lens for charity, but it was not for me, sharp almost to be cold stabilized very well, but f2.8 are f2.8. I never regretted the absence of the stabilizer, indeed in the landscapes I always mounted the filter nd. In the night street from the best, of course it must be used as any 16-35, it is not a 35 tip and snaps... the leaks of the lines are obvious and if you can't keep the car in axis the result is merciless... but if you study and learn the rules, that lens is a joy. I think this is a lens not for newtors, buy the 17-40 or the f4 and you will have more fun! But if you want a true backlight rose you can't ask for better, in fact you... going on its version 3 or on Zeiss. Used must buy. sent on August 27, 2019 |
 | Canon EOS M5 Pros: Lightness-Super Compact optics-quality Cons: APSC-All too small in hand, but still good ergonomics Opinion: Ideal Travel Machine. The image quality is great, the lenses are very fast. It has No compromises, it only makes extremely sharp photos. If you want a room to always have in your bag or backpack is this. Light practice and comfortable. The limits: Not at the top of the APSC, other brands certainly have done better in the numbers but in practice I would not be so sure. Are you a photography enthusiast? It's Not for you! Do you Want a machine that makes perfect shots without putting too much head? To buy right away, the used one has a ridiculous price for what it gives you! Will The EF-M system die in a few years? Whatever. If you want to invest and have used value is the wrong choice! sent on April 09, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Pros: Those reported by everyone, length weight discretion and construction Cons: At least in my model the zoom is rather hard because of the lens output, slightly unbalanced forward, new price. Opinion: Starting with the assumption that it is now out of production and around the price of the used is definitely interesting, and from the fact that I owned 70-300 L-70-300 is and 70-200 F4 smooth. The 70-300 L is better, but I sold it because it was always at home for weight and its lack of discretion. The 70-300 is what you buy ... a good start to start and have fun. True comparison I'm going to do it with the 70-200 F4 that is smooth or little changes in my opinion because it is in this price range that is the used. RnOra for street use, how often have you "scared" Someone because you had the whitewash? I have several ... even those who wanted to be photographed were posing and the result was a photo to be thrown ... with this objective they will not notice you and they will not matter to you ... what i like ... rnIn Mountain how many times for the weight you left at home the 70-300 l i have so many ... rn Now we come to the comparison with the 70-200 F4: less objective lens and this one knows, between 70 and100 mm sticker a lot more ... between 100-200 are preteent are the same.rn soft 200-thread at the most open focal, well from F8 up.rn sharpness and here's my astonishment ... the DO is Definitely clearer to all the vowels of comparison from F8 up. Definitely and sorry for my length, if you take photographs of the day, travel and count weight is a professional goal to have, if instead look for a blade for good nights and You want to catch the hair at 250m you buy more ... rnAh ps: i do not know why but on apsc is extremely less clear and disapproved.rn sent on June 17, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro Pros: Sharpness - lightness Cons: the old generation noisy AF Opinion: Hard to explain to those who have not used or not he uses this goal. You see it and you feel in low-quality plasticized, touch it and try to focus on something mettta in AF and you think back to the 90s with an annoying noise, clicks and you wonder why you have not installed the new 50 1.8 STM. Look at the picture and understand! For me it's exciting a lens, period. This macro there to have a ratio of 1: 1 requires the extension tube, is the autofocus is very old, but at the bottom of a picture do we want? Emotions and to me this sense, the da! Suitable for all kinds, for the pockets of anyone ... well a perspective that opens the picture at all. Try it in life! sent on April 15, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
