|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Kame www.juzaphoto.com/p/Kame  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R LM WR Pros: Lightweight, compact, stellar resolution, blurry and build quality Cons: It looks like a toy compared to the old 23 1.4. But maybe it's not really a con Opinion: Taken in hand looks like a toy compared to the old 23 1.4. Then you mount it and start shooting and... O_O was impressed. Stellar optical resolution, great blur, great AF. Little else to say, a modern and practical perspective that does not regret the old 23 1.4 in anything. Extremely happy with the gearbox. Fujifilm does not joke and makes another gem to carry around jaunty pulling out impeccable shots. sent on February 26, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XF 50mm f/1.0 R WR Pros: Pleasantness and softness of the blurred. Great engraving at full opening. AF extremely precise. Incredible transmission. Constructive quality. Cons: Generous weight (845g). AF not lightning. Move a lot of glass. Opinion: I summarized what I think, accompanying the thoughts from many photos here: http://www.davideblandino.it/blog/2020/10/03/review-the-one-l-uno/ Optics is unique as the fuji marketing rightly says. The One, the 1.0 is an optics for those who understand and know how to appreciate it. The cost is in line with the product and is not at all high when compared with its more closed brothers in fuji or solutions of similar complexity of other houses. sent on October 04, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: HVF, layout of controls, the file quality and ease of use Cons: EVF "smallest" of the series xt Opinion: Ok, the ISO dial can be strange or uncomfortable for those who are not from the film, but in fact is perfectly in line with the design and functional choices fuji.rnNonostante have x-t1, t2-x, and x-pro, the latter it is undoubtedly my favorite if I go out for pleasure or fun. Unlike x-t2 which is a means of prissy and hyper practical work, the x-Pro is the perfect tool for an experienced photographer looking for an entertainment and amusement in his passione.rnTutta the machine is built to last and transmit a feeling back that you can not fail to appreciate. The functions are all there, maybe less accessible than in the x-t2, but all are customizable. RNLA quality of files then combined with fixed ob as the 35 1.4 is extraordinary. With HVF and a pair of fixed stock exchange it becomes the fuji more fun and rewarding. sent on October 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Leggereza, AF perfect, perfect WB, grip, IQ and the rest of the spec Cons: Honestly, I have not yet received. Opinion: In my opinion I've long exposed here: http://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?l=it&p=1027rnrnPer the rest ... the d750 is not the ultimate machine. There will always be room for improvement or major turning points. RNE 'a machine honest, practical, lightweight and efficient. It is sold at a sensible price in an industry supertrafficato, as it is currently one of the FX Nikon. rnNon is a replacement for the d700, already the D610 as IQ is better in everything and the d810 as a whole. The d700 was a legend. The d750 will be the new. rnIl as I see it a success. rnNikon has made a series of epochal innovations followed by a series of oversights and blunders, often badly remedied. rnOra pulls a line out the d750. It starts the competition looks, climbs on the glass and it will be called upon to respond as soon as possible. sent on October 08, 2014 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness throughout the frame. Bokeh neutral. Excellent correction of chromatic aberrations. AF fast and accurate Cons: Variability of calibration between samples. Tested two, one at 0 and the other at +10 / +3 / +3 / 0. With the dock is resolved quickly and it works perfectly, without, some examples may be unusable. Opinion: I wrote a mini review with pictures on my blog.rnSintetizzando ... rnrnDopo a happy experience of a year of Art 35 I was curious to try the new model created by Sigma, hopeful that would guarantee the same standards of grand'angolare cousin. rnHo had for years a 50 f/1.4G Nikon that I was never fully satisfied. rnIntendiamoci, is a practical and lightweight lens that shows excellent sharpness from f/2.8. At full aperture, however, missing expectations, has significant chromatic aberration and spherical and has a hysterical blur the specular reflections. this RNA, we can add that to focus with the Nikon 50 f/1.4G can be quite a feat, given the curvature of field and the drift of the fire. rnrnLe expectations for the new born Sigma were so very high, despite the focal length of 50 mm has always seemed to me a sort of middle ground does not practice between 35 and 85. rnIl sigma, abandons the classical scheme of 50mm and features a double Gauss back-focus system very similar to the proposal of Otus Zeiss. rnQuesti patterns, with many more elements, while suffering from a distinct and indispensable auchin of size and weight, they are able to provide a correct image and engraved throughout the frame. rnrnDopo a try in the store, I immediately decided to purchase having found a truly remarkable image quality. rnL'obbiettivo is solid, well-finished, with a generous hood to protect a generous first lens over 70 mm. Monta filters 77 mm. The focus ring is very doughy and practice, slightly better than the 35 Art, maybe too soft. rnih particular struck me immediately the excellent cutting edges even at close range. rnrnE 'Just one click to show his character. rnGià from this f/1.4 lens shows how the very small curvature of field and the work of sigma on the optical scheme has significant benefits in terms of sharpness and image correction. rnPersonalmente find the yield excellent bokeh. It is certainly not at the levels of optics for dairy / buttery but given the sharpness guaranteed bokeh is very neutral, and does not suffer from the specular reflections off sharply but soft floors. rnPersonalmente I also find lievementand better than the sigma 35 Art rnrnUltimo dramatically important element of the reliability of the fire. rnHo had the opportunity to try out two copies. The first, which I have not bought it, was absolutely perfect without AF fine tuning. rnSul second, I have here at home, I had to apply a correction to the dock +10 / +3 / +3 +0. rnApplicata correction I have to say that the fire is very responsive, fast and accurate, with both the central and side with ALL (on d800). rnQuesta variability of departure, however, made my copy almost unusable without the correction of the dock. rnSegnalo the dock now also offers the possibility to adjust the magnitude of the focus override, in practice the amount of movement of the focus ring to disengage the AF motor. rnrnNel complex by testing turns out to be a great lens, suitable for professional use. My intent is to use it to replace the 24-70 for use in ceremonies and corporate photography, catalogs and more. RNLA minimum focusing distanceFocus is good. rnrn sent on August 04, 2014 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Optical quality: sharpness & microcontrast, control aberrazioni.rnQualità artistic three-dimensional, creamy bokeh, great detachment of the plans. Cons: Substantial weight, plasticaccia cap, lens hood bruttino.rnAF often inaccurate. * EDIT * With firmware update becomes ottimornNon sealed. Opinion: After trying to Photoshow and have been waiting for a month, finally arrivato.rnSubito intesivamente proven on the field that can not be excited about the image quality combined with D800.rnrnIl file is extraordinarily engraved at f/1.4 with a clear break between the soft but floors. The bokeh is really nice and the perfect focal not to remove more from baionetta.rnrnFinalmente sigma has hit the mark and after hesitation or wavering products has produced a gem that reminds finishing well superiore.rnrnIl class of optical aberration control is among the best I've seen at full aperture and the incision is very good throughout the frame already at f/1.4. rnNon feels the need to close the aperture and take home even landscape photography quietly at f/1.4. This allows excellent versatility in night shots, especially in città.rnrnL 'autofocus is not lightning but nemmno too slow. The accuracy is final on areas with good contrast. With dim lighting stentin a low contrast conditions. Just know and analyze the scene to determine accurately the point of MF.rnrnIn substance: a gioiellino.rnrn * EDIT * rnAggiornato firmware from AD Service. Now it seems to have become absolutely reliable and side steps work without problemi.rnOttimo! Rnrn sent on April 21, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR Pros: Lightweight, range Cons: Pronounced vignetting, VR rather ineffective Opinion: Tried kit d600, left me quite perplesso.rnrnLa quality is what you would expect from a lens of this range, average good with some sacrifice allows you to take sharp working diaphragms intermedi.rnIl VR has been a sore point, in all honesty, a new lens so I expected better, among all Nikkor VR and I've tried, this is the one whose stabilization has convinced me meno.rnrnLa color rendition is good, the fuzzy dignitoso.rnE 'a lens from kits, practical to carry around all the time but, on the contrary of the latest releases nikon, not marked by a light output professionale.rnrnInsomma,'s extremely practical ... and that's it. sent on January 06, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Cons: Minimum distance of focus, purple fringing at room temperature Opinion: sent on December 27, 2012 |
 | Nikon D600 Pros: Lightness, maneuverability, dynamic range and performance at high ISO Cons: Oversaturated colors, dark viewfinder, AF coverage area, marked OLPF Opinion: The body is a bit 'giocattoloso but the heart of the machine makes it a perfect reflex passeggio.rnLa range and detail at high iso is well above the d700, d800 also very similar to what is missing at the level of fine detail. rnProvata from 6400 ISO up to results up to the name that you are creating this small full frame. rnPurtroppo colors are Nikon medium-low. rnMentre d300/d700/d3 and follow d800/d4 have a neutral rendering with faithful colors, the d600 tends to saturate the colors too, cutting the legs at the time of development. RNLA color rendition is very similar to that of d7000 with saturated colors, vibrant and high contrast already in the raw. rnStessa made on the jpg, but the finished product with excellent sharpness and un'qualità final. rnNel complex produces files much more responsive sisters pro, but for this very neutral and less manageable. rnPer comparison, the raw open the d800/d4 seem "dull" when compared with those of d600.rnIn practice, the negative note, for those accustomed to d800/d700/ D3 is the complexion. It 'way too saturated and lose gradations of color is enough fastidioso.rnL' exposure proved absolutely perfect. The WB good despite what they say in rete.rnSull 'I can say that autofocus is fast and hooks up well. The coverage area AF can however be a problem. RNLA d600 machine is really interesting for anyone who wants to go around doing street / landscapes / portraits with a microscopic body, light and sound without sacrificing the charm and benefits of full frame. rnMi feel sconsigliarla hand to anyone in the photography work (either the first or the second, like me) because it would clash with the limited software, hardware and performance. rn sent on November 24, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Sharp, sharp, sharp. Beautiful colors. VR perfectly ridiculous price for the quality it offers. Cons: Slight vignetting on FF f / 4, if it is a problem because the machine would correct itself already. Opinion: Wide. Engraved from edge to edge since f / 6 is magna Mr. 14-24 on d800 f / 8. The stabilizer is very useful and finally present a wide-angle high level. The colors struck me. While all grand'angoli always tend to be a bit 'cold this makes the color 1:1. The chromatic side, however, correct in the car is very light, which is rare for a wide angle. With modules specially disappears completely from edge to edge. You lose a bit 'focus from 14-24 to 16-35, but the quality is impeccable even more than 2/3 of the field at a ridiculous price for the quality it offers. Compact and lightweight, accepts 77mm filters without causing vignetting. Very resistant, if not immune, to ghosts and flares. sent on June 02, 2012 |
 | Nikon D800 Pros: Light and comfortable, PerSono with the MB-D12, all keys finally in the right place (except one). Incredible dynamic range. Image quality in all situations truly stratospheric and precision autofocus. Fantastic response at high iso, images always defined and detailed with grain dry as a time with the film. Cons: LCD still wrong. Nikon does not understand that if the photo size is 24x36 the same ratio must be complied LCD. Pictures taken as always have two black bands. There will also be more space for the shooting information display canon but provide more useful area and a better picture. High sensitivity to dust on the sensor. The density of the sensor only in this complicates slightly life. The dust begins to perceive gradually from f / 8 to f/11 instead of up. The button for auto-focus, style d7000 is a bit 'difficult to swallow coming from the previous generation (d700/d300) Opinion: Expect a car like that for years now. In particular, a machine with a dynamic range and a yield qualitative image of another level. The d800 astounded me going beyond expectations. The dynamic range is captured objectively frightening. You can not compare with anything else (for now). The yield at high iso is definitely a foot above the d700 and in some ways very similar to the D3S if resized to 12.3 mp. The workability of the file is exceptional. Both in raw jpg to tiff that what comes out of the machine is a detailed image and full-bodied with very nice colors and color gradations and accurate. The raw file and tiff are bulky but not heavy to handle with a PC in the last 2 years. The entire workflow development and management of the file is not slowed down as we thought when the size of the files has been sent. The shutter speed is not outstanding but not later problems for sports photography or wildlife. The battery grip helps to increase, at least in some modes ofclick. But rarely more than 4fps are needed if you know what you're taking. Finally, the battery grip is an accessory of good quality that goes well to the camera body. Extremely solid and comfortable does not increase that much weight. E 'was shaped differently is extremely more comfortable MB-D10. Too expensive as ever and made in China, as usual, makes an already extremely handy machine more comfortable when used with SB-9x0 and heavy targets. Overall, this round, Nikon surprised me much more than I imagined even from the samples and the first comments. Another planet. sent on June 02, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: Incidentally, precise, sturdy, comfortable and rewarding Cons: Expensive? Opinion: A lens really exciting. Recorded immediately by 2.8 does not feel the need to close the iris. The stabilization is absolutely perfect and the autofocus fulminio. It 'a zoom to a fixed size (does not stretch during the trip) which makes it extremely easy to handle. The zoom adjustment is soft and mellow, very accurate. Mates with good results with the TC-20EIII. Loses nothing by speed autofocus and stabilization loses two stops is exceptionally recorded while being used with a multiplier. An extraordinary goal. sent on January 09, 2012 |
 | Nikon TC-20E III Pros: Coupled with significant new VR2 Cons: The pin of the ticchettia when dismantled Opinion: I must say I am extremely impressed with the new TC-20EIII. The optical scheme renewed has been adapted in order to give the best with his new family VR2. For those who have a fixed optical VR1 improvements are still good while for those using optical VR2 will be excellent. Surprising results with the 70-200 2.8 VR2. It is rumored that it was ottimizzatto for the new zoom and this is proof. Nikon says it is not possible to make fire with 105mm f2.8 micro. It is not true. Despite the autofocus become extremely slow yet fully efficient and accurate. sent on January 09, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR II Pros: Aim to do everything that F8 gives excellent results across the entire zoom. Cons: Slightly soft wide open vignettoso Opinion: Quest'obbiettivo, often considered simple lens of kit, despite the wide range of zoom, allows you to carry a bag of lenses with a very low weight while maintaining good quality. Obviously not at the level of the first lenses or zoom professional but weighs half of a 24-70 f2.8. From the constructive point of view stretches too much to maintain good solidity in the front part, the ring of focus is very small and of little use. Despite these little things is a zoom that while ruining easily outwardly remains solid and functional even after years of snowstorms, salt and salt. Mine has now been around the world several times and found himself in unrealistic situations back home healthy and satisfactory picture. sent on November 11, 2011 |
 | Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro Pros: EVERYTHING. Objective incisissimo, fast focus, excellent stabilizer Cons: The quality weights. Opinion: Objective quality only carves out a place among the best first home Nikon. The VR works very well and the focus over 5 meters snaps and chases with excellent speed. Although it is a macro lens with performances closely noteworthy is a lens that also allows for infinitely gratifying results. The ring focus mellow and generous allows fine focusing extremely useful in macro photography. The construction of absolute solidity conveys a reassuring feeling. There is little else to say. It 'a lens that in spite of the weight must find a place in your backpack. sent on November 11, 2011 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Optical quality from f2.8 up remarkable Cons: Soft at f1.4 and AF is not fast Opinion: Although it is a little soft at room temperature and the AF is not at the level of the new generation of Nikon Prime, the optical quality of this lens, especially working between f4 and F7.1 is really notevole.rnUtilizzato on DX for portraits or industrial photography from the results absolutely remarkable with engraved lines and excellent bokeh.rnUtilizzato FX is a lens to do everything with a fine blend of retro charm and optical quality moderna.rnE 'a lens that though it gives great satisfaction it is quite difficult to use. The point of focus should be carefully chosen and often resort to manual focus to be more rapidi.rnNonostante is only a 50mm when used on a DX needs considerable attention in the choice of the PDC. sent on November 11, 2011 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Pro? PRO! In everything you everywhere already in TA is absolutely solid and rewarding tridimensionale.rnAssolutamente Cons: Pesa but there's more ... it's nice long, Suffers of d800 Opinion: After several tentannamenti DX and various thoughts I decided to buy this lens frustrated by the results obtained with lenses optically less performanti.rnNonostante the very high cost, size, extremely generous and substantial weight, this is 24-70 The Target to combine with any body "serious" .rnIndipendentemente by size, yield and usability of this lens are unique and represent the benchmark for quality Nikon.rnPosso assure you that the difference can be seen in any situation and the quality of the lens is definitely comparable to some first lenses.rnLa lack of VR is to be considered in this case an advantage in the sense of reducing the weight and footprint. Rarely used, being able to work with the fine lines of fire also TA.rnLo zoom is nice mellow and precise, and the fire is generous in size as you conviene.rnrnSu d800 suffers at the edges. And 'perspective to the ceremony and portrait why this matters relatively. In terms of contrast and quality is fine but if you want to use it for scenery or architecturecould be better, as the 16-35 f / 4. sent on November 11, 2011 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX II Pros: Professional construction throughout, Engraved wide open 12 to 23 Cons: Softens a little 'to 24 f4 but recovers quickly Opinion: I have version DXII (Red Line and internal motor for Nikon). It seemed right then to write the first review. I got to cover the range up to 24 and come from the superb 11-16 f2.8 tokina. Honestly I miss the 11-16 f2 .8 and its usability but I must admit that this is really the way already 12-24 F4. I was also pleasantly surprised by the distortion rather controlled, especially when compared with his brother 11-16 to 11. Of Tokina now I know I can trust, construction, optical and mechanical, is absolutely flawless. The lens transmits precision and safety in all its parts and the yield is certainly excellent. I am extremely happy with our purchase. The new anti-glare really works I hope that the update also 11-16 with the same coating. sent on November 11, 2011 |
 | Nikon D300 Pros: Excellent performance already in jpeg if set properly, good raw if exposed correctly. Solid, has traveled the world with me taking sand, salt, water, rain, mud. Perfect. Electronics professional mold. Cons: You have to have the patience to learn to use it. It is not trivial to tame. High noise at high ISO in underexposed areas. Live view generation obsolete. Opinion: Are now three years that this reflex is with me in all my travels, adverse conditions or not. What amazed me immediately is the ability to configure and manage electronic machine. It is not a simple reflex but properly configured with considerable satisfaction. Features and controls are at the level of professional grade Nikon and there are fundamental functions for the most demanding photographers. Compatibility and management of the park is excellent optical, rather it is a machine that, especially with the battery grip dedicated to better manage any type of optical AF, even old-fashioned. I printed photos up to 90x60 will get results very rewarding. Landscapes suffer like all the DX (APS-C) of reduced size, recoverable in part dedicated to good goals. For nature photography the ratio 1.5x and helps the sensor reduced helps a lot in macro photography in practice by increasing the depth of field achievable. The fps with battery grip arrive at 8 allow a burst quite remarkable. To photograph indoors should be accompanied with the right flash (sb-900) to obtain remarkable results. I am very satisfied with this body, and over time I was able to relate it with the competition convinced me more and more of the good choice at the beginning. I will look closely at the D400 (if ever released), but I'll break the d300 only with many tears. sent on September 03, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
