What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user28347 | sent on September 11, 2016 (15:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I see a little light but very detailed la vedo un po chiara ma dettagliatissima |
| sent on September 11, 2016 (15:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank Sapf passage,
it was just a processing choice, I wanted to stay soft with the galaxy and bring out the beautiful star field, hoping to have succeeded. Grazie del passaggio Sapf,
è stata solo una scelta elaborativa, volevo restare morbido con la galassia e mettere in risalto il bel campo stellare, sperando di esserci riuscito. |
| sent on September 11, 2016 (16:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Sapf, it should be slightly less luminous galaxy
Anyway great job Concordo con Sapf, dovrebbe essere leggermente meno luminosa la galassia
Comunque ottimo lavoro |
| sent on September 11, 2016 (16:10) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
user4758 | sent on September 12, 2016 (6:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, I especially like these shots wide field ...
But I was expecting a lot more detail on M31 by an integration of four hours! why? Bella, mi piacciono particolarmente queste riprese ad ampio campo...
Però mi aspettavo molto più dettaglio su M31 da un'integrazione di 4 ore! come mai? |
| sent on September 12, 2016 (12:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful image and excellent performance of the 105 ;-)
Zeppo: unfortunately these focal is very difficult to have the details ... long exposure (among other things with the individual just 4 minutes which are not many) need to give softness to the whole, reduce the noise and have depth in parts weak and extended (v. alone) ... but the detail is given only by the focal shooting ... if your "system" is understood as a coupled sensor (pixel size) and fiber does not allow you to solve a detail can also integrate 100 hours but that detail does not give you the same ;-)
Hello,
Francis bella immagine e ottima resa del 105 
Zeppo: purtroppo a queste focali è molto arduo avere del dettaglio... l'esposizione lunga (tra l'altro con singole di soli 4 minuti che non sono tanti) serve per dare morbidezza al tutto, abbattere il rumore e avere profondità nelle parti debole ed estese (v. alone)... ma il dettaglio viene dato solo dalla focale di ripresa... se il tuo "sistema" inteso come accoppiata sensore(grandezza pixel) e ottica non ti permette di risolvere un dettaglio puoi anche integrare 100 ore ma quel dettaglio non lo avrai lo stesso
ciao,
Francesco |
| sent on September 12, 2016 (13:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many thanks to the steps and congratulations!
Many thanks Francis!
And thanks for your explanation Zeppo, as well as share it, I could not express myself better! A longer focal would definitely treated differently Galaxy.
In fact, this Sigma is surprising to me in deep, thinking that I had taken only for my macros, and I decided to try it just for the event on the sky. Mille grazie per i passaggi e complimenti!
Mille grazie Francesco!
E grazie per la tua spiegazione a Zeppo, oltre che condividerla, non avrei saputo esprimermi meglio! A focale maggiore avrei sicuramente trattato diversamente la galassia.
In effetti questo Sigma mi sta sorprendendo nel deep, pensare che l'avevo preso solo per i miei macro e avevo deciso di provarlo solo per caso sul cielo. |
user4758 | sent on September 12, 2016 (13:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Zeppo: unfortunately these focal lengths is very difficult to have the details ... long exposure (among other things with the individual just 4 minutes which are not many) need to give softness to the whole, reduce noise, and having deep into weak and extended parts (v. alone) ... but the detail is given only by the focal shooting ... if your "system" is understood as a coupled sensor (pixel size) and fiber does not allow you to solve a detail you can also integrate 100 hours but that detail does not give you the same „
Actually ... now that I have you explained it clearly and logically! ;-) " Zeppo: purtroppo a queste focali è molto arduo avere del dettaglio... l'esposizione lunga (tra l'altro con singole di soli 4 minuti che non sono tanti) serve per dare morbidezza al tutto, abbattere il rumore e avere profondità nelle parti debole ed estese (v. alone)... ma il dettaglio viene dato solo dalla focale di ripresa... se il tuo "sistema" inteso come accoppiata sensore(grandezza pixel) e ottica non ti permette di risolvere un dettaglio puoi anche integrare 100 ore ma quel dettaglio non lo avrai lo stesso"
Effettivamente... adesso che me l'hai spiegato è chiaro e logico! |
| sent on September 12, 2016 (23:45) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful, congratulations! |
| sent on January 31, 2017 (6:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A real sea of ??stars. Bravo .... Un vero mare di stelle. .... Bravo |
| sent on February 01, 2017 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Sciorty!
Thanks Bal, always kind! Grazie Sciorty!
Grazie Bal, sempre gentile! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
11.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
