What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user55885 | sent on June 14, 2015 (15:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Light is good but they are expert pdr architectural; I seem to see the pdf on the clock.
Hello, Tan. La luce è buona ma sono esperto di pdr architettonico; mi sembra vedere il pdf sull'orologio.
Ciao, Tan. |
| sent on June 14, 2015 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Tan
greetings Bruno concordo con Tan
saluti Bruno |
| sent on June 14, 2015 (17:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Tan what you mean pdf clock ;-) Tan cosa vuoi dire pdf sull'orologio |
| sent on June 14, 2015 (17:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Brown
through the passage Bruno
grazie del passaggio |
user55885 | sent on June 14, 2015 (17:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Antonio: the point of focus or AF point better. Sorry I abbreviated, so I ran away.
Hello Antonio: il punto di messa a fuoco o meglio punto AF. Scusa se ho abbreviato, mi è scappato così.
Ciao |
| sent on June 14, 2015 (17:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the fact is that to do this kind of picture
We should make them on the stand in Live View and focus manually, because the manual focus is Samyang
I put the ring to infinity and I took in 2.8
this definitely got me: - | il fatto è che per fare questo genere di foto
bisognerebbe farle sul cavalletto in Live View e focheggiare manualmente, perchè il samyang è manualfocus
io ho messo la ghiera all'infinito e ho scattato a 2.8
sicuramente questo mi ha fregato |
| sent on June 14, 2015 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
woooooow that perspective: -D woooooow che prospettiva |
| sent on June 15, 2015 (12:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mottillo
But because you are kind
Hello
Antonio Mottillo
Ma grazie sei gentile
Ciao
Antonio |
| sent on June 15, 2015 (19:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Antonio
I had the Sammy, offering F2.8, you should have no problems whatsoever to the fire, however, does not take forever with Sammy, stop for a little bit before, then you should do as many tests with this perspective, with tests to detect where is the best focus, and we make a mark with a marker or what you want, or remember where is the location, however I do not ever passing him three meters maybe in a bit above but never infinite.
Remember that with smaller apertures, have a problem of maf, especially in photo close if they do 8-)
A greeting
Vittorio 8-) ;-) Ciao Antonio
Ho avuto il Sammy, mettendo a F2,8, non dovresti avere problemi di sorta per il fuoco, comunque non portare all'infinito con il Sammy, fermati un pochino prima, poi ti consiglio di fare delle prove come fanno molti con questa ottica, con le prove rilevi dove è la migliore messa a fuoco, e ci fai un segno con un pennarello o cosa desideri te, oppure ricordi dove è la posizione, io comunque non superavo mai i tre metri forse un pelino sopra ma mai all'infinito.
Ricorda che con diaframmi più chiusi, avrai più problemi di maf, specialmente in foto da vicino se ne farai
Un saluto
Vittorio |
| sent on June 15, 2015 (19:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
well ... like the beginning we must say that you've done quite well!
Antonio bravo! nice B / N!
ciauuuzz Mario beh...come inizio bisogna dire che te la sei cavata piuttosto bene!
bravo Antonio! bel B/N!
ciauuuzz Mario |
| sent on June 15, 2015 (20:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice Antonio !! :-) Molto bella Antonio!! |
| sent on June 15, 2015 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Vittorio
I thank you very much for the tips you gave me
for apertures I noticed, in fact, before I put fire to 2.8, especially in low light, and then I close depending on the circumstances
hello
Antonio Vittorio
ti ringrazio moltissimo per le dritte che mi hai dato
per i diaframmi chiusi me ne sono accorto, difatti prima metto fuoco a 2.8, specialmente con poca luce e poi chiudo a seconda delle circostanze
ciao
Antonio |
| sent on June 15, 2015 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mario
you're always friendly
hello
Antonio Mario
sei sempre gentilissimo
ciao
Antonio |
| sent on June 15, 2015 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Arvina
thanks a lot of passage
Antonio Arvina
grazie mille del passaggio
Antonio |
| sent on June 16, 2015 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like it. The slight grain, imho, enhances even more shooting, compliments :-P mi piace molto. La leggera grana, imho, valorizza ancora di più lo scatto, complimenti  |
| sent on June 16, 2015 (18:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Francesco
we say that not all silver lining ;-) :-P
thank you so much for the passage
hello
Antonio Francesco
diciamo che non tutti i mali vengono per nuocere
grazie mille per il passaggio
ciao
Antonio |
| sent on June 16, 2015 (20:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Antonio
Canon 5D (Mark II, Mark III) Focal Length 14 mm, azzz not take it well, see below :-(
f / 1.4 f / 2 f / 2.8 and f / 4-f / 5.6 or f / 8 and f / 11, f / 16, f / 22, f / 32
Distance
(Meters) Near Far Near Far Near Far Near Far Near Far Near Far Near Far Near Far Near Far Near Far
0.25 0.24 0.26 0.23 0.27 0.23 0.28 0.22 0.29 0.21 0.31 0.19 0.35 0.18 0.42 0.16 0.59 0.14 1.37 0.12?
0.5 0.45 0.56 0.44 0.59 0.41 0.63 0.39 0.71 0.35 0.86 0.31 1.23 0.27 3.16 0.23? 0:19? 0:15?
0.75 0.65 0.89 0.61 0.97 0.57 1.10 0.52 1.37 0.46 2.07 0.39 7.59 0.33? 0.92.15 29.2 1.80? 1:47? 1.16? 0.90? 0.68? 0:51? 0:37? 0:27? 0:19?
4.5 2.28 155 1.90? 1:53? 1.20? 0.92? 0.69? 0:51? 0:38? 0:27? 0:20?
5 2:40? 1.98? 1:58? 1.23? 0.94? 0.70? 0:52? 0:38? 0:27? 0:20?
5.5 2:51? 2:05? 1.63? 1.26? 0.96? 0.71? 0:52? 0:38? 0:27? 0:20?
6 2.61? 2.12? 1.67? 1.29? 0.97? 0.72? 0:53? 0:38? 0:28? 0:20?
8 2.93? 2:32? 1.79? 1.36? 1:01? 0.74? 0:54? 0:39? 0:28? 0:20?
10 3.16? 2:46? 1.88? 1:41? 1:04? 0.76?ECircolo of confusion: 0.03 mm
This is a table for calculating dell'iperfocale, but on 14mm 5DMKIII, on the web will find many explanations, there are also App, that calculate the hyperfocal if I can be helpful, iDoF calculator, Field Tools, TrueDoF-intro, etc. ..., the focus at F2.8, which then changes the diaphragm is not so much in keeping, I would not do that, then it depends ........... !!!!
A greeting
Vittorio 8-)
;-) :-( :-( Ciao Antonio
Canon 5D (Mark II, Mark III) Lunghezza focale 14 mm, azzz non la prende bene, leggi sotto
f / 1.4 f / 2 f / 2.8 f / 4 f / 5.6 f / 8 f / 11 f / 16 f / 22 f / 32
Distanza
(metri) Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano Vicino Lontano
0.25 0.24 0.26 0.23 0.27 0.23 0.28 0.22 0.29 0.21 0.31 0.19 0.35 0.18 0.42 0.16 0.59 0.14 1.37 0.12 ?
0.5 0.45 0.56 0.44 0.59 0.41 0.63 0.39 0.71 0.35 0.86 0.31 1.23 0.27 3.16 0.23 ? 0.19 ? 0.15 ?
0.75 0.65 0.89 0.61 0.97 0.57 1.10 0.52 1.37 0.46 2.07 0.39 7.59 0.33 ? 0.27 ? 0.21 ? 0.16 ?
1 0.82 1.27 0.77 1.43 0.70 1.74 0.62 2.52 0.54 6.84 0.45 ? 0.37 ? 0.29 ? 0.23 ? 0.17 ?
1.5 1.13 2.21 1.03 2.75 0.91 4.21 0.79 16.6 0.66 ? 0.53 ? 0.42 ? 0.32 ? 0.24 ? 0.18 ?
2 1.40 3.51 1.24 5.10 1.08 14.3 0.90 ? 0.74 ? 0.58 ? 0.45 ? 0.34 ? 0.25 ? 0.19 ?
2.5 1.63 5.41 1.42 10.5 1.20 ? 0.99 ? 0.79 ? 0.62 ? 0.47 ? 0.35 ? 0.26 ? 0.19 ?
3 1.82 8.48 1.57 34.9 1.31 ? 1.06 ? 0.84 ? 0.64 ? 0.49 ? 0.36 ? 0.26 ? 0.19 ?
3.5 1.99 14.3 1.69 ? 1.39 ? 1.12 ? 0.87 ? 0.66 ? 0.50 ? 0.37 ? 0.27 ? 0.19 ?
4 2.15 29.2 1.80 ? 1.47 ? 1.16 ? 0.90 ? 0.68 ? 0.51 ? 0.37 ? 0.27 ? 0.19 ?
4.5 2.28 155 1.90 ? 1.53 ? 1.20 ? 0.92 ? 0.69 ? 0.51 ? 0.38 ? 0.27 ? 0.20 ?
5 2.40 ? 1.98 ? 1.58 ? 1.23 ? 0.94 ? 0.70 ? 0.52 ? 0.38 ? 0.27 ? 0.20 ?
5.5 2.51 ? 2.05 ? 1.63 ? 1.26 ? 0.96 ? 0.71 ? 0.52 ? 0.38 ? 0.27 ? 0.20 ?
6 2.61 ? 2.12 ? 1.67 ? 1.29 ? 0.97 ? 0.72 ? 0.53 ? 0.38 ? 0.28 ? 0.20 ?
8 2.93 ? 2.32 ? 1.79 ? 1.36 ? 1.01 ? 0.74 ? 0.54 ? 0.39 ? 0.28 ? 0.20 ?
10 3.16 ? 2.46 ? 1.88 ? 1.41 ? 1.04 ? 0.76 ? 0.55 ? 0.39 ? 0.28 ? 0.20 ?
15 3.53 ? 2.68 ? 2.00 ? 1.47 ? 1.07 ? 0,78 ? 0.56 ? 0.40 ? 0.28 ? 0.20 ?
20 3.76 ? 2.81 ? 2.07 ? 1.51 ? 1.09 ? 0.79 ? 0.56 ? 0.40 ? 0.28 ? 0.20 ?
30 4.00 ? 2.95 ? 2.15 ? 1.55 ? 1.11 ? 0.80 ? 0.57 ? 0.40 ? 0.29 ? 0.20 ?
50 4.23 ? 3.07 ? 2.21 ? 1.58 ? 1.13 ? 0.80 ? 0.57 ? 0.41 ? 0.29 ? 0.20 ?
? 4.63 ? 3.28 ? 2.32 ? 1.65 ? 1.17 ? 0.83 ? 0.59 ? 0.42 ? 0.30 ? 0.22 ?
Iperfocale
distanza 4.63 3.28 2.32 1.65 1.17 0.83 0.59 0.42 0.30 0.22
Circolo di confusione: 0,03 millimetri
Questa è una tabella per il calcolo dell'iperfocale, 14mm ma su 5DMKIII, sul web troverai molte spiegazioni, ci sono anche App, che calcolano l'iperfocale se ti può essere utile,iDoF calculator, Field Tools,TrueDoF-intro,ecc...., la messa a fuoco a F2,8, che poi cambi diaframma non è tanto consona, io non lo farei, poi dipende...........!!!!
Un saluto
Vittorio
|
| sent on June 16, 2015 (20:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Antonio, in the end I managed to buy ... Now Sammy fun
Hint: unless it took hold in the machine axis to prevent excessive distortion of perspective Sammy.
Hello
John Antonio, alla fine sei riuscito a comprare il Sammy ... Ora divertiti
Suggerimento: a meno che non sia voluto tieni la macchina in asse per evitare l'eccessiva distorsione prospettica del Sammy.
Ciao
Giovanni |
| sent on June 16, 2015 (20:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Vittorio
SEI GRANDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Grazieeeeeeeeeeeee Vittorio
SEI GRANDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
GRAZIEEEEEEEEEEEEE |
| sent on June 16, 2015 (20:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
John
I know during shooting I tried to tilt but ate very high Giovanni
lo so in fase di scatto ho provato a inclinare ma mangiavo molto in alto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
20.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
