What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 14, 2014 (21:15)
Stack info: Canon 5D Mark II, Canon MP-E 65 lens 47 natural light exposures, f4.0, ISO 100 Magnification: 5X Photographed on 29.03.2014 |
| sent on December 14, 2014 (22:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You can contargli hairs by so much and 'sharp.
Greetings ale Puoi contargli i peli da tanta e' nitida. Saluti ale |
| sent on December 15, 2014 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With good technique has been able to obtain an excellent detail.
Con buona tecnica ha saputo ricavare un eccellente dettaglio.
|
| sent on December 15, 2014 (18:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Super detail! Congratulations Hello Max Super dettaglio! Complimenti Ciao Max |
| sent on December 15, 2014 (23:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Impressive detail !!! Congratulations gandy Impressionante il dettaglio!!! Complimenti gandy |
| sent on December 17, 2014 (13:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I saw that you used sony a7, nex 6, but mainly canon 5d mk ii. All photos are very beautiful, I would say perfect, but it seems to me that the best results are obtained with the canon. Am I wrong in thinking that the macro formats Micro 4/3 and aps-c, using focal lenses shorter, sometimes they can be more appropriate where it is needed more depth of field? Congratulations for photos and Christmas greetings. Ho visto che hai usato sony a7, nex 6, ma prevalentemente canon 5d mk ii. Tutte le foto sono molto belle, direi perfette, ma mi sembra che i migliori risultati siano ottenuti con la canon. Sbaglio nel pensare che per la macro i formati micro 4/3 e aps-c, usando obiettivi di focale più corta, a volte possano essere più indicati laddove è necessaria maggiore profondità di campo? Complimenti per le foto e auguri di buon Natale. |
| sent on December 21, 2014 (9:20)
Hi, the Canon combination is a very tough one to beat indeed. :) When shooting macro the depth of field depends also on pupil magnification and that's difficult to quantify. An advantage of a smaller sensor is that a lower magnification is needed so fewer exposures are usually made when making stacks. The disavantage is the lower image quality compared to a FF sensor. See here at the bottom of the page about depth of field: www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/depth-of-field.htm |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |