What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 29, 2012 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Canon 40D, Canon EF 70-200mm f / 4 IS, 200mm 1/400s (I do not understand, tell me the exif f/7.1 ... possible?) Crop, freehand Canon 40D, Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 IS, 200mm 1/400s (non capisco, gli exif mi dicono f/7.1 ... possibile?) crop, mano libera |
| sent on January 29, 2012 (16:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know if you were at the minimum focus as possible but I would have made differently and under-exposed so as not to burn the whites, as regards F.7.1 celo have to tell you, from the picture I can tell that you were not in it f.4 it to F.16 ;-) Hello Ivan Non so se eri alla minima messa a fuoco possibile, ma comunque io avrei composto diversamente e sotto-esposto in modo da non bruciare i bianchi; per quanto riguarda f.7.1 celo devi dire te, dalla foto ti posso dire che non eri ne a f.4 ne a f.16  Ciao Ivan |
user1338 | sent on January 29, 2012 (17:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Ivan88, maybe I took closer seeing the beauty of the butterfly would have given greater prominence, butterfly and its roost, for the background noise is known.
The maf seems to fall on feels but does not cover the wings, the use of a tripod you can guarantee stability without incurring the move.
Hello. ;-) Sono d'accordo con Ivan88, magari avrei scattato più vicino visto la bellezza della farfalla le avrei dato maggiore risalto, farfalla e il suo posatoio, per lo sfondo si nota rumore.
La maf sembra cadere sulla tasta ma non copre le ali, l'uso di un cavalletto ti può garantire maggiore stabilità senza incorrere nel mosso.
Ciao. |
| sent on January 29, 2012 (18:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes, I completely agree with you :)
Unfortunately the conditions were totally adverse to me :) Border road (with constant risk of being hit by truck mega-Americans), 13 pm (which can be very active), and a nice gator watching me sleepy at about 4 meters away. I would have posted another version in the gallery, I think I improved the composition, and playing with light / shadows I recovered the recoverable ... any advice on this?
thank you very much valuable advice
hello
yes sono perfettamente d'accordo con voi :)
Purtroppo le condizioni mi erano totalmente avverse :) Bordo strada (con rischio costante di essere investito da mega-tir americani), 13 del pomeriggio (quindi soggetti attivissimi), ed un bel gator che mi guardava sonnacchioso a circa 4 metri di distanza. Avrei postato in galleria un'altra versione, credo di aver migliorato la composizione, e giocando con luci/ombre ho recuperato il recuperabile ... qualche consiglio in merito?
grazie mille dei preziosi consigli
ciao
|
| sent on January 29, 2012 (20:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I posted in the gallery another version „
You can put it in an answer [IMG];-) " Avrei postato in galleria un'altra versione"
puoi inserirla in una risposta con [IMG] |
| sent on January 29, 2012 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Max: done, thanks :) @Massimo: fatto, grazie :) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
