JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on March 13, 2014 (8:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And in fact! My favorite of the series! Although there remains the problem of the high lights! ;-) E infatti!!! La mia preferita della serie! Anche se rimane il problema delle alte luci!
sent on March 13, 2014 (8:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
here I have definitely done something wrong in the development of Raw. I used a graduated filter to try and balance the exposure in the shadows at the bridge and the most exposed. is not an irreparable mistake, because the photo is not compromised in any case, it would be enough for me to underexpose slightly to the left. maybe try tonight!
perhaps it would also be the case for change slightly wb.
Well then the version I have on flickr is less "problematic" from the point of view of the artifacts caused by sharpening.
(I have done everything in lightroom, I'm sure someone better might be able to draw from something more pleasant)
qua ho decisamente sbagliato qualcosa nello sviluppo del raw. ho usato un filtro graduato per cercare di equilibrare l'esposizione tra le ombre in corrispondenza del ponte e la parte più esposta. non è un errore irreparabile, perchè la foto non è comunque compromessa, basterebbe secondo me sottoesporre leggermente la parte a sx. stasera magari provo!
forse sarebbe anche il caso di cambiare leggermente wb.
poi beh la versione che ho su flickr è meno "problematica" dal punto di vista degli artefatti causati dallo sharpening.
(ho fatto tutto in lightroom, sono sicuro che qualcuno più bravo potrebbe essere in grado di cavarne qualcosa di più gradevole)
sent on March 13, 2014 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But the sharpening artifacts notice them after posting the photo or there is something that does not just go after the PP? And why do you want to apply unsharp masks on an image that perhaps does not need it? But you will not cruciare much, from the raw file orignal you can get many designs. More than anything else you have to take a source file that is not overexposed too much, because after things coplicano ... Ma gli artefatti dovuti allo sharpening li noti dopo aver postato la foto o c'è qualcosa che non va appena dopo la PP? E poi perché vuoi applicare maschere di contrasto su un'immagine che forse non ne ha bisogno? Comunque non ti cruciare più di tanto, dal file raw orignale puoi ottenere molte versioni. Più che altro bisogna scattare un file all'origine che non sia sovraesposto più di tanto, perché dopo le cose si coplicano...
sent on March 13, 2014 (13:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The artifacts actually only see them here, exporting from lightroom and the photos on Flickr are perfect Gli artefatti in realtà li vedo solo qua, l'esportazione da lightroom e la foto su flickr sono perfette
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
