RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Valle Maggia...

Valle Maggia

View gallery (16 photos)

Valle Maggia sent on March 10, 2014 (19:25) by Vulture. 4 comments, 246 views.

, 3.2 sec f/22.0, ISO 50,




View High Resolution 3.8 MP  

2 persons like it: Cumulus, Gerardo83


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on March 13, 2014 (8:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The shadow of the bridge, especially on the left do not like so much! I wanted to ask if you've noticed immediately overexposure in minitor ... wow!

avatarsenior
sent on March 13, 2014 (8:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

yeah, this one I sooo overexposed to try to lengthen the time (I did not put the data, but I think it was 2.6 seconds or so). that much I could not underexpose in lr. however, I have already solved for the future, because yesterday I got 3 filters, ND8, 64 and 1000. I did this with my "old" ND8 of dubious quality. plus closing at f22, which if you look at creating major problems of diffraction.

thank you!

avatarsupporter
sent on March 13, 2014 (13:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In fact, I can confirm that with a day like the ND8 is too "little". Of course the 64 is fine. So I begin to understand why these sovvraesposizioni! And it is also clear that the recovery of the whites can not do real miracles. Everything has a limit. Marco Tasca (66tasca on Juza) use much 1000 ... if you want to ask him to do something as well. It 'a nice guy as well and tell him I sent you! :-D:-D ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on March 13, 2014 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ahahahaha thanks a lot! However, given that even you seem "somewhat" prepared also take advantage of your knowledge!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me