JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 03, 2011 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello Bernadine ... you took 1/8 freehand? The atrmosfera shooting is good, cut off a couple of inches of sky and give it a puree pp. I avoided that especially in the foreground on the right mixes a bit. ciao bernardine... hai scattato 1/8 a mano libera? L'atrmosfera dello scatto è buona, taglierei un paio di cm di cielo e gli darei una passatina in pp. Avrei evitato il primissimo piano che soprattutto nell'angolo a dx impasta un pò.
sent on December 03, 2011 (23:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The picture is quite lacking in sharpness. It could be because of the shake caused by a slow shutter speed to be done freehand or if you have used the plasticotto 18-55, by the fact that a fully open aperture that lens is quite soft and generates images lack detail. In a case like this would be better to raise the ISO to 400 to get a shutter speed faster though still at risk moved, even better would be to have a tripod and leaving the ISO to 100, close to the diaphragm 8, where the lens usually works much better, you would surely have a better result. La foto è parecchio carente di nitidezza. Potrebbe essere a causa del micromosso generato da un tempo di scatto lungo per essere fatto a mano libera oppure, se hai usato il plasticotto 18-55, anche dal fatto che a diaframma tutto aperto quella lente è piuttosto soft e genera immagini poco dettagliate. In un caso come questo sarebbe stato meglio alzare gli iso a 400 per avere un tempo di scatto più veloce anche se ancora a rischio mosso, meglio ancora sarebbe stato avere il cavalletto e, lasciando gli iso a 100, chiudere a diaframma 8, dove quella lente di solito lavora molto meglio, avresti avuto sicuramente un risultato migliore.