What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 29, 2011 (9:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A good photo. Hello. Una buona foto. Ciao. |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (9:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
be not bad, but I see it clear the right for a no crop, you've done some work in post-production or "smooth"? the maf where it falls, precise eye? edit: I read more carefully the shooting data, as pointed out to me Dany59 in another post, you're in the safety times for 600 mm, 1/250 is too little, if taking photos, from 1/500 up not 'd have shake .... All this does not mean anything to cmq photo I like, both as components, such as light, and as bokeh ... a greeting enrico essere non è male, ma la vedo nitida il giusto per un no crop, hai fatto qualche intervento di postproduzione o è "liscia"? la maf dove cade, sull'occhio precisa? edit: ho letto con più attenzione i dati di scatto, come faceva notare anche a me Dany59 in altro post,sei sotto i tempi di sicurezza per un 600 mm, 1/250 è troppo poco, se scattavi da 1/500 in su non avresti avuto micromosso.... tutto questo non toglie cmq nulla alla foto che mi piace, sia come compo, come luce, e come bokeh... un saluto enrico |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (9:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Henry, I spoke in camera raw to balance the main parameters and the maf if it was not the eye (I'm away from home and I can not control) was not far away. It 's true, the time is not' security but I always try not to exceed 800 ISO (I was still on a tripod). Hello Ciao Enrico, sono intervenuto in camera raw per equilibrare i parametri principali; la maf se non era proprio sull'occhio (sono fuori casa e non posso controllare) non ne era distante. E' vero, il tempo non e' di sicurezza ma cerco sempre di non superare gli 800 ISO (ero comunque su cavalletto). Ciao |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (10:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ah ok if you make a mask contrast becomes another photo ;-)! trust me! ah ok se fai una mascherina di contrasto diventa un altra foto! fidati! |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (15:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful capture, great shot. Splendida cattura, ottimo scatto. |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Composition and excellent color rendering. Unfortunately the subject is lacking in sharpness. Composizione e resa dei colori ottima. Purtroppo il soggetto pecca in nitidezza. |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (19:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact, the subject is not very clear, it is still a good martino Hello In effetti il soggetto non è molto nitido, rimane comunque un buon martino! Ciao |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (19:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
maybe not crystal clear but still very nice forse non nitidissimo ma comunque molto bello |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (20:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the steps, I 'to improve the clarity even if I'm really struggling! Grazie dei passaggi, cerchero' di migliorare sulla nitidezza anche se sto veramente facendo fatica! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |