What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 06, 2013 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A composition that gives delicacy, elegance and poetry to your shot.
I like it very much!
Congratulations Flavio:-P
Ciaooo
Michela Una composizione che regala delicatezza, eleganza e poesia al tuo scatto.
Mi piace molto!
Complimenti Flavio
Ciaooo
Michela |
| sent on August 06, 2013 (15:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful, quoto Michela, congratulations! ;-):-P
Have a nice day!
By Fabio Molto bella, quoto Michela, complimenti! 
Buona giornata!
By Fabio |
| sent on August 09, 2013 (14:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Michael and Fabio, are very welcome your comments:-D Grazie Michela e Fabio, sono molto graditi i vostri commenti |
| sent on August 09, 2013 (14:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Forgive me if I see the photo in a different way.
The diaphragm used suggests a selective maf, in fact the eye looks sharper the rest of the butterfly. Generally, however, a similar type of selective maf you should do when you want to select and highlight a part of the subject, but with a closer shot.
Personally I would have chosen a better parallelism to obtain the butterfly as possible in focus. Clear that what is written is not a rule, but as I said a simple thought. Perdonami se vedo la foto in modo differente.
Il diaframma usato fa supporre ad una maf selettiva, infatti l'occhio appare più nitido del resto della farfalla. Generalmente però un tipo simile di maf selettiva lo si dovrebbe fare quando vuoi selezionare ed evidenziare una parte del soggetto, ma con una ripresa più ravvicinata.
Personalmente avrei scelto un miglior parallelismo per avere la farfalla il più possibile a fuoco. Chiaro che quanto scritto non è una regola, ma come detto un mio semplice pensiero. |
| sent on August 09, 2013 (15:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It 'a Pontia edusa not it? E' una Pontia edusa o sbaglio? |
| sent on August 09, 2013 (15:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
pieris brassicae. Pier suggestions are as good as your reasons. perhaps the use of flash would have allowed us to close the iris holding fast times but then we're all good:-D hello pieris brassicae. i suggerimenti di Pier sono buoni come le tue ragioni. forse l'uso del flash avrei permesso di chiudere il diaframma tenendo i tempi veloci ma poi siamo tutti bravi ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
ho tenuto il diaframma così aperto per avere tempi più alti, difatti nonostante abbia scattato a 800 iso e a f5.0 il tempo di scatto era di 1/125 il minimo per evitare che venisse mossa. 
