What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 27, 2013 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello to everyone! I know that I made a mistake somewhere .... I've done a thousand photos from this point with a thousand variables, I've published 2, tell me where I'm wrong?? ;-) ciao a tutti! so che ho sbagliato da qualche parte....ho fatto mille foto da questo punto con mille variabili,ne ho pubblicate 2,mi dite dove sbaglio??? |
| sent on July 29, 2013 (12:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
.. maybe trying to decentralize the subject right or left :-) .. magari provando a decentrare il soggetto a dx o sx |
| sent on July 29, 2013 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride, I'll try 'in the next experiments ;-) Grazie del passaggio,ci provero' nei prossimi esperimenti |
| sent on September 03, 2013 (20:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Watch compositional point of view is correct, the suggestion but, in my opinion, does not solve the problem of the shot and the series of other shots posted. I should review the use and reporting of exposure time, aperture, ISO, last but not least please review the point of focus and the use dell'iperfocale. For example, in this time iris watches them, let alone the iso. The time used freehand got you the shake-when using a wider aperture would have had a slow shutter speed and security with an appropriate focus depth of field appropriately. The Valmalenco no wobbles!
diego Guarda dal punto di vista compositivo è corretto il suggerimento ma, a mio parere, non risolve il problema dello scatto e di altri scatti della serie postata. Ritengo debba rivedere l'uso e la relazione di tempi, diaframmi, iso, non ultimo rivedi il punto di messa a fuoco e l'uso dell'iperfocale. Ad esempio in questa guarda la coppia tempo diaframma, lasciando stare gli iso. Il tempo usato a mano libera ti ha procurato del micromosso quando usando un diaframma più aperto avresti avuto un tempo di scatto di sicurezza e con una opportuna messa a fuoco una profondità di campo appropriata. La Valmalenco non traballa!
diego |
| sent on September 03, 2013 (20:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you very much for the advice, the diaphragm is actually here just a little closed .... I thought was enough to give depth to a genius ...:-D
I'll try .. hello floor piano.ciao grazie mille per i consigli,effettivamente qui il diaframma è proprio un pò chiuso....pensavo bastasse a dare profondità...un genio
io ci provo..piano piano.ciao ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
