JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 20, 2011 (15:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like the cut, small burn on the nose does not bother anyway. There is just something we see it again on the post-production of the skin (you can see the blur). ;) A slauto ... Mi piace molto il taglio, la piccola bruciatura sul naso non dà comunque fastidio. C'è solamente qualcosa da rivedere ancora sulla post-produzione della pelle (si nota il blur). ;) Un slauto...
sent on October 21, 2011 (13:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Richard! Thanks for the ride! Explain to me what I need to improve in post? I better eliminate blur areas that do not interest me? I can not understand ... :) Ciao Richard! Grazie del passaggio! Mi spieghi cosa devo migliorare in post? devo eliminare meglio le zone di blur che non mi interessano? Non riesco a capire... :)
sent on October 21, 2011 (16:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
We note too the blur on the areas where you do not want details. You should see the original to understand what the situation is natural, what was done and how it could be improved. So, I can only tell you that you can see (at least for an eye more or less "trained"), which was probably duplicated the layer was applied a blur and were then masked the areas that you want in detail, or those on which wanted to reduce the noise. Anyway ... there are many tutorials on the web (using different methods) on how to treat your skin ... ;) What is the shortest of the blur / immediate but sometimes is not the most efficient ... Si nota troppo la sfocatura sulle aree in cui non vuoi dettaglio. Bisognerebbe vedere l'originale per capire bene com'è la situazione al naturale, cosa è stato fatto e come si potrebbe migliorare. Così, posso solo dirti che si vede (almeno per un occhio più o meno "allenato") che è stato probabilmente duplicato il livello, è stata applicata una sfocatura e sono state poi mascherate le aree che si volevano in dettaglio o quelle su cui si volevano attenuare le imperfezioni. Cmq... sul web si trovano molti tutorial (con metodi diversi) su come trattare la pelle... ;) Quello della sfocatura è il più breve/immediato ma a volte non è il più efficiente...
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
