What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 19, 2013 (10:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Forgive my frankness but ... is a technique hdr botched: beyond artificial effect, generally, the bigger mess than it is on the sky to the left of the tree (lacking in detail despite the hdr should donate it to the whole picture).
To be reviewed (check to see if the clicks are valid and try again.)
Greetings ... Perdona la franchezza ma... è una tecnica hdr mal riuscita: al di là dell'effetto artificioso, generale, il pasticcio più grande è sul cielo a sinistra dell'albero (privo di dettagli nonostante l'hdr dovrebbe donarlo a tutta la foto).
Da rivedere (controlla se gli scatti sono validi e tenta di nuovo).
Un saluto... |
| sent on July 19, 2013 (10:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto richard! It would be a great photo but there to see the sky ... Greetings :) Quoto richard !!! Sarebbe una bellissima foto ma ce da rivedere il cielo ... Un saluto :) |
| sent on July 19, 2013 (14:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This photo has a great potential expressed at the moment. There are too many whites burned in the sky at the top right and too much chromatic aberration on the branches of the tree. I look forward to see a version that solves these two problems because the picture deserves. Hello Raffaele. :-) Questa foto ha un grande potenziale al momento inespresso. Ci sono troppi bianchi bruciati nel cielo in alto a destra e troppa aberrazione cromatica sulle fronde dell'albero. Aspetto con piacere di vedere una versione che risolva questi due problemi perché la foto merita. Ciao Raffaele. |
| sent on July 19, 2013 (14:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
quoto Richard in full, the idea of ??HDR would capture the full dynamic range of the scene, in most excites me the shot with the fence there but for sure you enter the personal tastes ... quoto Richard in pieno, l'idea dell'HDR sarebbe catturare tutta la gamma dinamica della scena, in più non mi entusiasma l'inquadratura con la staccionata presente ma si entra di sicuro sui gusti personali... |
| sent on July 19, 2013 (17:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comments, the real problem is not so much the 'HDR wrong but the' time of the recording, however, as I was passing them and who knows when I'll come back :-( I tried the same. In the white area, unfortunately, there is the sun veiled by a thin cloud, I should try a HDR 5 to 7 shots because even if the photo of 1 stop underexposed is fairly burned in that area. ;-) Grazie per i commenti, il problema vero non è tanto l' HDR sbagliato ma l' ora dello scatto, siccome però passavo di li e chissà quando potrò tornarci  , ho tentato lo stesso. In quella zona bianca purtroppo c'è il sole velato da una nube sottilissima, avrei dovuto provare un HDR a 5 se non 7 scatti perchè anche la foto di 1 stop sottoesposta è comunque abbastanza bruciata in quella zona.  |
| sent on July 19, 2013 (17:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More clear, very difficult conditions that I would have captured more shots / exposures (both are free ... brings home things as possible, then we work). ;-)
Even areas not burned, however, such as the clouds on the left, gray halos are too "artificial", appear gray brush strokes on blue sky.
To say that, however, different processing could save you a lot of photos. If you want, test.
Greetings Tutto più chiaro, condizioni difficilissime che avrei comunque catturato con più scatti/esposizioni (tanto sono gratis... porta a casa più cose possibile, poi ci lavori).
Anche le zone non bruciate, comunque, ad esempio sulle nuvole a sinistra, presentano aloni grigi troppo "artificiali", sembrano pennellate grigie sul cielo azzurro.
Per dire che, comunque, un'elaborazione diversa potrebbe farti salvare molto, della foto. Se ti va, prova.
Un saluto |
| sent on October 23, 2013 (4:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
sky too heavy and unnatural ... then it would not hurt .. cielo troppo carico e innaturale...poi non sarebbe male.. |
| sent on February 20, 2014 (23:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Even for me. All nice and perfect, except the sky.
Hello :-) Anche per me. Tutto bello e perfetto, tranne il cielo.
Ciao :-) |
| sent on February 21, 2014 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photo succeeded very well, only a little less for the postproduction cilelo perhaps would have made a little more natural, as regards water and trees instead the effect is very pleasant, compliments. :-) Foto molto ben riuscita, solo un po di meno postproduzione per il cilelo forse l'avrebbe resa un pò più naturale, per quanto riguarda invece acqua ed alberi l'effetto è molto piacevole, complimenti. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
