What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 29, 2022 (20:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not mind this portrait at all: well the cut given to the image, very well the expression of the bride, smiling and natural, leaves me a bit 'perplexed the MAF but I do not go further, well also light and complexion, in essence a good job. Leonardo Non mi dispiace affatto questo ritratto : bene il taglio dato all'immagine , molto bene l'espressione della sposa , sorridente e naturale , mi lascia un po' perplesso la MAF ma non vado oltre, bene anche luce e incarnato , in sostanza un buon lavoro . Leonardo |
| sent on December 01, 2022 (17:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, can you explain the MAF well? Grazie, mi spieghi bene la MAF? |
| sent on December 01, 2022 (17:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I give you a rough opinion because I follow the Forum essentially from smartphones, which is not the best to appreciate the images. In my humble opinion, the focus falls on the farthest eye (the left of the model) and on the mouth, not on the eye closest to the photographer; given the proximity, always in my opinion, you could have closed a stop or two to have more depth of field and therefore more details in focus. The background is practically neutral (maybe moving a little you would also have avoided the curtain flap and you would have obtained a more uniform background) so there are no disturbing details even with a more closed diaphragm. Leonardo Ti do un parere di massima perché seguo il Forum essenzialmente da smartphone , che non è il massimo per apprezzare le immagini . A mio modesto avviso , il fuoco cade sull'occhio più lontano (il sx della modella) e sulla bocca , non sull'occhio più vicino al fotografo ; data la vicinanza , sempre opinione mia , avresti potuto chiudere ancora di uno stop o due per avere più profondità di campo e quindi più particolari a fuoco. Lo sfondo è praticamente neutro (magari spostandoti un po' avresti anche evitato il lembo di tenda e avresti ottenuto uno sfondo più uniforme) quindi non vi sono particolari di disturbo anche con un diaframma più chiuso . Leonardo |
| sent on December 01, 2022 (17:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Leonardo, I will treasure what you wrote to me. Grazie Leonardo, ne faro' tesoro di quello che mi hai scritto. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |