Oglio River | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

71.7 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Paesaggi 2 View gallery (36 photos)

Oglio River sent on July 31, 2022 (16:40) by Rhoken. 7 comments, 352 views.

, 5 sec f/6.3, ISO 64, tripod.

View High Resolution 71.7 MP

2 persons like it: Fabio F77, Renzo Fermo

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Nino.ulissi

sent on August 10, 2022 (23:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

With the 16 MP of an old omd em1 + an Olympus 12/f2 you could take a picture with a resolution of real photos, this seems to me a backdrop for a cartoon. Sorry...

Nino.ulissi

sent on August 10, 2022 (23:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

.... and without tripod...

Rhoken

sent on August 11, 2022 (6:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If 71 Megapixels do not seem to you a resolution from "real" photos...

Scrutatortenebrarum

sent on August 11, 2022 (12:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think nino was referring to the fact that in these 71 megapixels there is more confusion than anything else.

Rhoken

sent on August 11, 2022 (12:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The water level was however lower than usual which is why you see more of the seabed.
If it was the same level as two years ago such a clear seabed would have been impossible to have.
Then if one remains ambiguous as Nino.. It's hard to accept a criticism

Scrutatortenebrarum

sent on August 11, 2022 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You shouldn't need the criticism of others to figure out what's wrong with the photo. All the green areas are confused, they look like micromoves. The focus area is far away and devoid of interest and a third of photos are empty. It is also not clear what the subject is

Rhoken

sent on August 11, 2022 (17:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well criticism is always useful because it is not enough just the eye of a person to find flaws in a photo.
You always need someone to compare

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.