Porcupine | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Wildlife (no birds)

20.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Fauna(no uccelli) View gallery (49 photos)

Porcupine sent on July 14, 2022 (12:12) by AleRoby. 2 comments, 157 views.

at 250mm, 1/125 f/6.3, ISO 1600, hand held. Specie: Hystrix cristata

View High Resolution 20.0 MP

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on July 14, 2022 (20:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Overall the result does not convince me for these reasons:
-double
microwax-dominant
purple-upper net
cut-non-safety shutter speed
In these situations, if you did not want to raise the iso, you could scatatre at full aperture (with the g2 up to about 200mm is f.5 and up to 400mm is f.5,6) ... perhaps they were enough to counteract the double micro-bone .. (imho).
Hello, Lauro

AleRoby

sent on July 15, 2022 (10:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You are right, thanks for the advice, unfortunately I shot when the flash was not charged, with only the light of the torch, all in a hurry and the porcupine did not stand still a second :-D
If you look for example at the photo of the axiol in the gallery nocturnal birds of prey, it is not so because I took it with flash and I also used the torch and then it was also stationary ...
Thanks again
Hello
Ale and Roby

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.