JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on April 20, 2013 (13:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Caught it ... but effective. We should have a little more luck on the height factor of the subjects as a point of recovery, but it is known that these birds are still restless by nature ... and you are going mad. Hello Alex Janka55 Riprese al volo... ma efficaci. Bisognerebbe avere un pò più di fortuna sul fattore altezza dei soggetti come punto di ripresa, ma si sa che questi uccellini comunque sono per natura irrequieti... e ti fanno diventar matto. Ciao Alex Janka55
sent on April 20, 2013 (16:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Put yourself in the shoes there who want to buy this new camera. No offense to anyone but those who analyze this shot certainly will not be enticed to purchase! At 500 ISO has a terribly big grain also taking into account the general kneading. I ask because it does not state that it is a cut or something maybe wrong in the management of PP??. Agreed: do not know you so you can be a beginner and you do not notice. Here is the usefulness of the forum: not so much to say but beautiful and good to know the pitfalls of an image on both the artistic and technical. Mettiti nei panni ci chi vuole acquistare questa nuova reflex. Senza offesa per nessuno ma chi analizza questo scatto non resterà di certo invogliato all'acquisto!! A 500 iso presenta una grana terribilmente grossa senza considerare poi l'impastamento generale. Ora domando perchè non dichiarare che è un ritaglio o qualcos'altro di errato magari nella gestione PP ???. D'accordo: non ti conosco quindi puoi essere un principiante e non te ne accorgi. Ecco l'utilità del forum: non tanto dire bella e bravo ma far conoscere le pecche di un immagine sia dal lato artistico che tecnico.
sent on April 22, 2013 (9:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A Janka is true what you say A Rubacolor, I can say that these are the first pictures taken with this camera, I currently have a lot of problems with my optical calibration hope to fix them, 's image in question is a 9.8 megapixel camera cutout in the car and did not There is no pp.Ti I also say that my subjects that are not usually the photographer, the rest say well this is a forum and you can say any opinion positive and negative. In the shoes of those who must buy I found I went and bought it, hello thanks Alex. A Janka è vero quello che dici A Rubacolor, ti posso dire che queste sono le prime immagini fatte con questa reflex ,io attualmente ho molti problemi di taratura con le mie ottiche spero di sistemarle ,l' immagine in questione è un ritaglio a 9,8 megapixel fatto in macchina e non vi è alcuna pp.Ti dico anche che non sono i miei soggetti che solitamente fotografo , per il resto dici bene questo è un forum e si può dire qualsiasi opinione positiva e negativa. Nei panni di chi la deve comprare mi sono trovato sono andato e lo comprata , ciao grazie Alex.