What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 13, 2013 (9:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very good image compliments:-D:-D
greetings carlo gran bella immagine complimenti saluti carlo |
| sent on May 04, 2013 (9:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice, although I would have preferred a little more depth of field, ciao.Siro. bella,anche se avrei preferito un po più di profondità di campo,ciao.Siro. |
| sent on May 05, 2013 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Siro you're right, but with an old D60 I preferred to keep the ISO to 200, then I also had luck: a free hand, however, in support of (1/20). Hello and good light. Siro hai ragione, ma con una vecchia D60 ho preferito mantenere gli iso a 200, poi ho avuto anche fortuna : a mano libera però in appoggio (1/20). Ciao e buona luce. |
| sent on May 05, 2013 (22:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry but overall the picture does not convince me for these reasons: -Moved because your shutter completely underpowered -Subject accordingly pasty -Strangely noisy for using only 200iso causes?: Super-crop? MDC? The good blurred. Tips: your 60d (the nikon d60 is) has about the same noise digital 7d ... without using "mental stakes" your reflex 400-500-640 iso Riccorri to a 1.4x extender kenko or canon to reduce the use of crop If the subject was taken up in a controlled environment, be sure to specify it in the caption. Hello and good life, laurel Scusami ma nel complesso l'immagine non mi convince per questi motivi: -tuo mosso causa tempo di scatto completamente sottodimensionato -soggetto di conseguenza pastoso -stranamente rumorosa per aver usato solo 200iso cause?: super-crop? MDC ? Buono lo sfocato. Consigli: la tua 60d (la d60 è nikon) ha circa lo stesso rumore digitale della 7d ... usa senza "paletti mentali" la tua reflex a 400-500-640 iso Riccorri ad un extender 1.4x kenko o canon per ridurre l'uso del crop Se il soggetto è stato ripreso in ambiente controllato, ricordati di specificarlo nella didascalia. Ciao e buona vita, lauro |
user5266 | sent on May 05, 2013 (22:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Meanwhile Franco Lauro read your message, I can confirm that he used a Canon D60 dated. Hello Alessandro Nel frattempo che Franco legga il tuo messaggio Lauro,ti confermo che ha usato una datata Canon D60. Ciao Alessandro |
| sent on May 05, 2013 (23:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
then the end of 2001: fconfuso: quindi fine 2001 |
| sent on May 06, 2013 (12:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Taken (as the title) to 'Oasis of Sant Alessio in a controlled environment. Lauro you're right, time is underpowered with all the consequences you mentioned, the crop is minimal then the noise is the cause why do not I take care of my post-production. I confirm that the camera is a Canon D60 6.3 megapixels. Your actions are always appreciated. Hello and good light. Scattata (come da titolo) all' Oasi di Sant Alessio in ambiente controllato. Lauro hai ragione, il tempo è sottodimensionato con tutte le conseguenze da te citate, il crop è minimo poi per il rumore la causa è mia perchè non curo la postproduzione. Confermo che la fotocamera è una Canon D60 da 6,3 megapixels. I tuoi interventi sono sempre apprezzati. Ciao e buona luce. |
| sent on May 06, 2013 (13:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks x the clarifications Franco. in that location not all individuals are physically controlled environment ... is why it is preferable to make a distinction. I conclude, therefore, that between you and what you had probably taken a glass, so you have to remember though is that the diffraction is increased fivefold if your plane is not parallel to the sensor glass ;-) Grazie x le precisazioni Franco. in quella location non tutti i soggetti sono fisicamente in ambiente controllato... ecco perchè è preferibile fare un distinguo. Deduco quindi che tra te e quello ripreso vi era probabilmente un vetro , se é così devi ricordarti che la diffrazione viene quintuplicata se il tuo piano sensore non è parallelo al vetro |
| sent on May 06, 2013 (22:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Lauro, you're always helpful and kind! :-) Grazie a te Lauro, sei sempre disponibile e gentile! |
| sent on May 07, 2013 (7:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In any case, because of the conditions is not exactly optimal, 1/20 and quite a long time, the photo is not bad. Very true that it is better not to be shy with the iso and raise them because it is always preferable to a little 'noise to move. Hello, Siro In ogni caso, proprio per le condizioni non esattamente ottimali ,1/20 e decisamente un tempo lungo, la foto non è male. Verissimo che è preferibile non essere timidi con gli iso ed alzarli anche perché è pur sempre preferibile un po' di rumore al mosso. Ciao,Siro |
| sent on May 07, 2013 (21:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to you too Siro for the passage and comments. Hello, Franco Grazie anche a te Siro per il passaggio e i commenti. Ciao, Franco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |