What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 27, 2020 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good colors and composition. :-)
They are palatable a pastiness and a general choppy.
It was preferable to raise the iso a little to better freeze its action.
For the pastiness the only one is to upgrade the bridge.
(imho)
Hello, Lauro Buoni i colori e la composizione. 
Sono palapabili una pastosità e un mosso generale.
Era preferibile alzare di poco gli iso per congelare meglio la sua azione.
Per la pastosità l'unica è di upgradare la bridge.
(imho)
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on April 27, 2020 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Lauro, thanks for the comment, the bridge I upgraded this year (I switched to the Sony A6000) also because unfortunately it has denoted a certain age, but I confess that I miss its practicality. Ciao Lauro, grazie per il commento, la bridge l'ho upgradata quest'anno (sono passato alla Sony A6000) anche perchè purtroppo ha denotato una certa età, ma confesso che mi manca la sua praticità. |
| sent on April 27, 2020 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great purchase species if you paste a 16-50mm - a 55-210mm or the fantastic,but expensive, 16-70mm zeis and the new 70-350mm oss 8-) Ottimo acquisto specie se ci incolli un 16-50mm + un 55-210mm o i fantastici ,ma costosi, 16-70mm zeis e il nuovo 70-350mm oss  |
| sent on April 27, 2020 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact, I have the 16-50 and I intend to take a zoom, 70-350mm would be ideal. Infatti, ho il 16-50 ed intendo prendere uno zoom, 70-350mm sarebbe l'ideale. |
| sent on April 27, 2020 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Look at the shots you've taken so far with what you've done to them
Nee data exif should appear to you the focal equivalent of 35mm, marked the average values
Now on sony with a 55-210mm you should have a range of focal equivalent to 82.5-315mm
se 300mm are suficient it could be enough 55-210mm (use sporting events, stolen shots, landscape with spaces)
with the 16-50mm ... 24-75mm (landscape use) :-) Osserva gli scatti che hai eseguito fino ad oggi con che focali gli hai fatti
Nei dati exif dovvrebbe apparirti la focale equivalente a 35mm, segnati i valori medi
Ora su sony con un 55-210mm dovresti avere un range di focali equivalenti a 82,5-315mm
se 300mm sono suficienti potrebbe bastarti il 55-210mm (uso eventi sportivi, scatti rubati, paesaggio con spazi)
con il 16-50mm ... 24-75mm (uso paesaggistico)
la p100 spaziava 26-678mm equiv |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
