JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Consapevole di avere commesso errori e che riceverò numerose aspre critiche, posto le foto anche perchè spero di ricevere sapienti consigli da chi è più esperto di me nel campo.
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user73210
sent on April 02, 2020 (12:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No harsh criticism for those who compare themselves like you. Try the same lowest iso shot (between 800 and 400) Nessuna aspra critica per chi si pone al confronto come te. Prova lo stesso scatto a iso più bassi (tra 800 e 400)
sent on April 02, 2020 (14:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Agree.. also 100 iso and f a little more closed time qb. but easel. you'll be amazed by yourself! Max Concordo..anche 100 iso e f un poco più chiuso tempo qb. ma cavalletto..ti stupirai da solo! Max
sent on April 02, 2020 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you.... Thank you very much............ you tried freehand ........ but of course the next one will be with easel grazie....grazie mille ............ si ho provato a mano libera ........ ma ovvio la prossima sarà con cavalletto
user73210
sent on April 02, 2020 (15:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That's right Max. We get the Braio result Esatto Max. Attendiamo il risultato Braio
sent on April 02, 2020 (23:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
-Lower iso (the moon is already bright of its own).. Iso 100 would be perfect -No need all-open diaphragm take it to 4.5 that the lens works better -then make several attempts lowering the times until the moon goes from gray to brown (the right time is the one just before you turn brown) Well you have found the right setting. The easel with times less than 1/500s especially if you have the stabilizer may not even serve Well now take at least 4/5 photos because the moon is not known why you can photograph it 1000 times and ways and always different? Scusami for the tedious message? -Iso più bassi(la luna è già luminosa di suo).. Iso 100 sarebbe perfetto -Non serve diaframma tutto aperto portalo a 8 che l obiettivo lavora meglio -poi fai diversi tentativi abbassando sempre più i tempi fino a che la luna non passa da grigia a marrone(il tempo giusto é quello appena prima diventi marrone)
Bene hai trovato il setting giusto. Il cavalletto con tempi inferiori a 1/500s soprattutto se hai lo stabilizzatore può anche non servire
Bene ora fai almeno 4/5 foto perché la luna non si sa perché puoi fotografarla 1000 volte e viene sempre diversa
sent on April 03, 2020 (19:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much you have not been tedious indeed like colleagues above very valuable :-) Grazie mille non sei stato tedioso anzi come i colleghi sopra molto prezioso :-)