What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 11, 2019 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice Victor, congratulations.
Hello, Paul. Simpaticissima Victor, complimenti.
Ciao, Paolo. |
| sent on September 11, 2019 (16:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Paolo, I am really glad for your appreciation.  Grazie mille Paolo, mi fa molto piacere il tuo apprezzamento. |
| sent on September 11, 2019 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I will tell Victor that the more I look at this image and the more I like it, it has the gift of simplicity and immediacy and I must say that the excellent blur of the 70-200/2,8 takes a lot of its own in making this photograph even more attractive.
Hello, Paul. Ti dirò Victor che questa immagine più la guardo e più mi piace, ha il dono della semplicità e dell'immediatezza e devo dire che l'ottimo sfocato del 70-200/2,8 ci mette molto di suo nel rendere questa fotografia ancora più attraente.
Ciao, Paolo. |
| sent on September 12, 2019 (6:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Paul.
As for the smooth 70-200, I had taken it mainly to use it in the arenas, but I confirm that I also found it very pleasant for the portrait. Grazie Paolo.
Per quanto riguarda il 70-200 liscio, lo avevo preso prevalentemente per usarlo nei palazzetti, ma confermo di averlo trovato anche molto piacevole per il ritratto. |
| sent on September 12, 2019 (9:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact.
On one occasion I compared the 4 L IS with the 2.8 smooth, I had confirmation of one thing I had already noticed: the greater sharpness of the 4 L IS but at the same time I noticed a dowry of 2.8 that was unknown to me, the beauty of the blurred precisely. Infatti.
In una occasione confrontai il 4 L IS con il 2,8 liscio, ebbi conferma di una cosa che avevo già notato: la maggiore nitidezza del 4 L IS ma nel contempo notai una dote del 2,8 che mi era sconosciuta, la bellezza dello sfocato appunto. |
| sent on September 12, 2019 (10:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I fortunately have a good copy of this goal (I don't say of all my goals, with this I was lucky). It confirms the trend of the various tests, and it emerges that it performs very well at TA at 200mm, remaining a little softer to the shorter, but still dignified focal points. And already closed at 3.2 the recovery is robust. Mom Canon should know well, because on recent cameras the "map" of use of the lens (e.g. on TV with ISO car), as soon as the security times allow, makes prefer 1/3 stop closing, even paying 1/3 of stop ISO, especially to the most focal Court.
I was thinking about the G2 tamron or the Canon IS II or III, but I'm waiting for the new RF to see how it goes, thinking that I'd most likely keep this anyway. Ho fortunatamente una buona copia di questo obiettivo (non lo dico di tutti i miei obiettivi, con questo sono stato fortunato). Conferma comunque la tendenza dei vari test, ed emerge che si comporta molto bene a TA a 200mm, rimanendo un pochino più morbido alle focali più corte, ma comunque dignitoso. E già chiuso a 3,2 il recupero è robusto. Mamma Canon lo deve sapere bene, perché sulle fotocamere recenti la "mappa" di utilizzo della lente (ad esempio in TV con ISO auto), appena i tempi di sicurezza lo consentono, fa preferire 1/3 di stop di chiusura, anche pagando 1/3 di stop ISO, soprattutto alle focali più corte.
Stavo pensando al tamron G2 o al Canon IS II o III, ma attendo senza grossi problemi il nuovo RF per vedere come va, pensando che molto probabilmente questo lo conserverei comunque. |
| sent on September 12, 2019 (15:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say that it is the case to wait for the RF, try it (as long as it is possible), and finally decide ;-) Direi che sia il caso di attendere l'RF, provarlo (sempre che sia possibile), e infine decidere  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
