What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 12, 2019 (14:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Adoroooooo Adoroooooo |
| sent on March 12, 2019 (15:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Top top |
| sent on March 12, 2019 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What is starless fashion?.... On some subjects is very interesting.
with what software?
Hello
Gp
Cos'è la moda dello starless?....su alcuni soggetti è molto interessante.
Con quale software?
Ciao
Gp
|
user172437 | sent on March 12, 2019 (18:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Without stars I don't like it, can I say it? ;-) Senza stelle non mi piace, posso dirlo?  |
| sent on March 12, 2019 (20:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful!
out of curiosity, how did you get an image like that? Bellissima!
Per curiosità, come hai fatto ad ottenere un'immagine così? |
| sent on March 12, 2019 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I am approaching from very little to this type of processing! I find it particularly suitable for galaxies because the stars that we photograph belong to our own galaxy. Removing them you see what you would see outside the Milky Way. Personally I do not find this processing suitable for nebulae, as these belong to our galaxy together with the stars. I used a program called StarNet + + to remove the stars Mi sto avvicinando da pochissimo a questo tipo di elaborazione ! La trovo particolarmente adatta alle galassie perchè le stelle che fotografiamo appartengono alla nostra di galassia. Rimuovendole si vede ciò che si vedrebbe all'esterno della via lattea . Personalmente non trovo questa elaborazione adatta alle nebulose , poichè queste appartengono alla nostra galassia insieme alle stelle. Ho utilizzato un programma chiamato starnet++ per rimuovere le stelle |
| sent on March 13, 2019 (7:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is not always said that the stars filmed are from our galaxy. Who, like me, does research on supernovae research just what remains of stars in other galaxies... And one of those dots might just be one. Non è sempre detto che le stelle riprese siano della nostra galassia. chi, come me, fa ricerca su supernovae ricerca proprio quel che rimane di stelle in altre galassie...ed uno di quei puntini potrebbe proprio esserne una. |
| sent on March 13, 2019 (11:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Slashleo, absolutely yes! But let's say it's a pretty rare event, at least on Andromeda, I don't remember recent supernovae. I caught one a couple of years ago on the Galaxy fireworks, there obvious that I would not do this processing :-D Slashleo, assolutamente sì ! Però diciamo è un evento abbastanza raro, almeno su Andromeda, non ricordo supernovae recenti. Ne ho beccata una un paio di anni fa sulla galassia fuochi di artificio, lì ovvio che non farei questa elaborazione  |
| sent on March 16, 2019 (9:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I personally use this technique very rarely and just to get a step level in processing. Also because it costs time and effort to achieve it well as made by Valeriano. But I don't think it's just the supernovae disappearing. There are all globular (I think over 300) that appear as stars, highly concentrated reflection nebulae that appear as such, many point elements that belong to the galaxy and this technique removes them as stars.
Personalmente uso questa tecnica molto raramente e solo per ottenere un livello di passaggio nell'elaborazione. Anche perchè costa tempo e impegno realizzarla bene come fatto da Valeriano. Ma non credo siano solo le supernove a sparire. Ci sono tutti i globulari ( mi pare oltre 300) che appaiono come stelle ,nebulose a riflessione molto concentrate che appaiono come tali, molti elementi puntiformi che appartengono alla galassia e questa tecnica rimuove calcolandoli come stelle.
|
| sent on April 07, 2019 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Franco, this technique can also be simply used to make stellar reduction! This time I went a little further but I did it just to experience :-) Grazie Franco, questa tecnica può anche essere semplicemente utilizzata per fare riduzione stellare ! Questa volta mi sono spinto un po' oltre ma l'ho fatto solo per sperimentare  |
| sent on December 11, 2021 (8:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fantastic whole gallery Fantastica tutta la galleria |
| sent on December 12, 2021 (0:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Fabio ! Grazie mille Fabio ! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
