What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 22, 2012 (22:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry but the whole does not convince me for these reasons: -Drastic cut of the legs of the player in the foreground disturbing -Too contrasty Very move- -Added effect no effect on the dynamic sensation Focal length, ISO, shutter speed and aperture used? hello and good light, laurel scusami ma nel complesso non mi convince per questi motivi: -taglio drastico delle gambe del giocatore in primo piano che disturba -troppo contrastata -molto mossa -effetto aggiunto ininfluente sulla sensazione dinamica Focale, iso, tempo di scatto e diaframma usati? ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on November 27, 2012 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello. I shot with a Tamron 18-270 at a distance of 200mm, f6 and with a shutter speed of 1/60 to 800 ISO. The gym was very dark, but the worst thing 'was not shoot in RAW. Blur on the original photo was very annoying, so 'I tried to put the motion blur to make the shot more' homogeneous. Unfortunately, the result is not 'was the best. ;-) Thanks for the comment and for the ride. Good light Ciao. Ho scattato con un Tamron 18-270 a una distanza di 200mm, f6 e con un tempo di scatto di 1/60 a 800 iso. La palestra era molto buia, ma la cosa peggiore e' stata non scattare in RAW. Il mosso sulla foto originale era molto fastidioso, cosi' ho provato ad inserire l effetto movimento per rendere lo scatto piu' omogeneo. Purtroppo il risultato non e' stato dei migliori. Grazie per il commento e per il passaggio. Buona luce |
| sent on November 27, 2012 (20:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ot the 18-270mm vc usd performs a precise mission: to be a perspective all-in-one ... that is versatile and compact. He has a good af, and as you get closer to 270mm loses something in sharpness. For this type of events, but also for portraits evaluates the new Tamron 70-200mm f.2, 8 vc, light, crisp and ultra-fast f or valid sigma 70-200mm os f.2, 8 stabilized. ;-) Shoot at 800iso f.6 and gave you a slow shutter speed to get a faster shutter speed so you have only four choices: - Raise the iso accepting rum.digitale - Open the aperture or use a view light - All 2 points above (mix) - Use a camera that works well at high iso www.dpreview.com/news/2012/09/13/Tamron-SP-70-200mm-F2-8-Di-VC-USD-ult www.tamron.eu/it/news/read/data/announcement-sp-70-200mm-f28-di-vc-usd www.dpreview.com/news/2010/9/13/sigma70200review hello, laurel o.t. il 18-270mm vc usd assolve ad una precisa missione: essere un'ottica tutto-in-uno ... ovvero poliedrica e compatta. Ha un buon af e man mano che ti avvicini ai 270mm perde qualcosa in nitidezza. Per questo tipo di eventi ma anche per ritratti valuta il nuovo tamron 70-200mm f.2,8 vc , leggero, nitido e un af ultraveloce oppure il valido sigma 70-200mm os f.2,8 stabilizzato. Scattare a f.6 e a 800iso ti ha regalato un tempo di scatto lento , per ottenere un tempo di scatto più rapido hai quindi solo 4 scelte: - alzare gli iso accettando il rum.digitale - aprire il diaframma o usare un'ottica luminosa - tutti e 2 i punti sopra (mix) - usare una reflex che lavora bene agli alti iso www.dpreview.com/news/2012/09/13/Tamron-SP-70-200mm-F2-8-Di-VC-USD-ult www.tamron.eu/it/news/read/data/announcement-sp-70-200mm-f28-di-vc-usd www.dpreview.com/news/2010/9/13/sigma70200review ciao, lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |