What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 07, 2012 (0:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
All players, the public and those who are on this side of the screen looking for the key element that has the ball ... but the ball is out of the frame :-|. Here is a matter of choices in pre-release and to assess whether equip your reflex of a battery-grip that is needed to promote vertical shots. A drive does not help you to choose some from time to time the compositions ... better a classic 70-200mm f.2, 8 or 50-135mm f.2, 8. Hello and good light, laurel Tutti i giocatori, il pubblico e chi è al di qua dello schermo cercano l'elemento cardine che è la palla ... ma la palla è fuori dall'inquadratura. Qui è questione di scelte nel pre-scatto e di valutare se dotare la tua reflex di un battery-grip che è necessario per favorire le inquadrature verticali . Un fisso non ti aiuta certo a scegliere di volta in volta le composizioni ... meglio un classico 70-200mm f.2,8 o un 50-135mm f.2,8 . Ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on November 07, 2012 (8:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For him | It is the best 0ttica think it would be a 70-200, perhaps the most 'forward, for now I have to do without it. In other shots, I used a Canon 24-105, do you think it would be better to use this light? Will post as soon as I can, a click made with the 24-105 Good light Joseph Ad averlo | Si l'0ttica migliore credo sarebbe proprio un 70-200, forse piu' avanti , per ora devo farne a meno. Negli altri scatti , ho usato un 24-105 Canon, credi che sarebbe meglio usare questa ottica ? Posterò , appena posso, uno scatto eseguito con il 24-105 Buona luce Giuseppe |
| sent on November 07, 2012 (9:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Let's say that budget permitting the range of focal lengths more consistent x sport have a 70-200 and a wide angle like the 24-70mm or 17-70mm or 24-105mm. .... only zoom. Most are bright ... the better. If no one can come close to f.2.8 at least to be f.4. imho hello laurel Diciamo che budget permettendo il range di focali più consone x questo sport sono un 70-200 e un grandangolare come il 24-70mm o 17-70mm o 24-105mm. .... solo zoom. Piú sono luminosi ...meglio é . Se non ci si puó avvicinare a f.2.8 almeno che siano f.4 . imho ciao lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |