What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user41490 | sent on August 02, 2017 (22:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Explain to me how did you do with a 30-second opening to not go skiing? A roby greeting mi spieghi come hai fatto con una apertura a 30 sec a non fare le scie? un saluto roby |
| sent on August 02, 2017 (22:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and sharp. In my opinion, with a bit of PP, considerably lowered the noise. In fact a skater is there (I think you did the calculations with 500 and 1.6 of the Canon sensor). I think it is more prudent to stay on the 400 if possible. However sincere congratulations: -o Hello Gabbia65 Bellissimo e nitido. Secondo me con un po'di PP abbassavi considerevolmente il rumore. In effetti un pelino di scia c'è (credo tu abbia fatto i calcoli con 500 e 1.6 del sensore Canon). Io ritengo più prudente stare sui 400, se possibile. Comunque sinceri complimenti Ciao Gabbia65 |
| sent on August 02, 2017 (23:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Guys, by the way with the 600 rule with 30 seconds I was also wide ... I could dare even a few more seconds. As for noise, they are still the first weapons with this kind of photos and I have not been able to do better, I hope to improve in the next shots ...
Anyway thanks for the comments, for me really precious!
Hello Ciao Ragazzi, per la scia con la regola del 600 con 30 secondi ero anche largo...avrei potuto osare anche qualche secondo in più. Per quanto riguarda il rumore, sono ancora alle prime armi con questo genere di foto e non sono riuscito a fare di meglio, spero di migliorarmi nei prossimi scatti... In ogni caso grazie dei commenti, per me davvero preziosi! ciao |
| sent on August 03, 2017 (10:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Clan. In fact, the rule of 600 must be interpreted or better applied taking into account the sky area where they were shooting. Obviously if you are around Polar, the speed of moving the stars is lower, but if you approach the horizon or if you turn to the south, I prefer to stay on the buttons. For noise, if I can afford a tip, try to look for Affinity on Youtube. There are several tutorials and one is devoted to this type of photography. The program has a modest cost and works great. I have abandoned Photoshop. Hi and good light Gabbia65 Ciao Clan. Di fatto la regola del 600 deve essere interpretata o meglio va applicata tenendo conto dell'area di cielo dove stati scattando. Ovviamente se stai attorno alla Polare la velocità di spostamento delle stelle è inferiore, ma se ti avvicini all'orizzonte o se ti rivolgi a sud, io preferisco stare dalla parte dei bottoni. Per il rumore, se posso permettermi un consiglio, prova a cercare Affinity su Youtube. Ci sono diversi tutorial ed uno è dedicato a questo tipo di fotografia. Il programma ha un costo modesto e funziona alla grande. Io ho abbandonato Photoshop. Ciao e buona luce Gabbia65 |
| sent on August 04, 2017 (18:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Cage! Thanks for the suggestion I hope to try it as soon as possible! Ciao Gabbia! Grazie del suggerimento spero di provarla quanto prima! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |