What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 02, 2012 (16:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice this shot stolen. Good composition, the focus in the foreground, the colors and the play of light shade.
The shutter speed used has not allowed you to freeze the subject exhibits a distinct blur.
In this situazone and when they have the "Time Machine", returning to that moment, or the iso or you were kicked by magic in his hands a view as clear as the Tamron 17-50mm f.2, 8, and you opened the diaphragm f.4 or better still f.2, 8.
hello and good light, laurel Piacevole questo scatto rubato. Buona la composizione, la parte sfocata in primo piano, i colori e i giochi di luce ombra.
Il tempo di scatto usato non ti ha permesso di congelare il soggetto che mostra un evidente micromosso.
In questa situazone e avendo a disposizione la "Macchina del tempo", tornando a quell'istante, o alzavi gli iso o ti trovavi per magia tra le mani un'ottica luminosa come il tamron 17-50mm f.2,8 e aprivi il diaframma a f.4 o meglio ancora f.2,8.
ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on September 02, 2012 (16:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
true the shake is evident .. shame because I liked this shot and I could go back I would try to raise the iso unfortunately not having the lens you recommended ;-) ... but raising the ISO would have been visible noise?
thank you very much verissimo il micromosso è evidente..peccato perchè mi piaceva questo scatto e tornassi indietro proverei ad alzare gli iso non avendo purtroppo l'obiettivo da te consigliato ...ma alzando gli iso sarebbe stato visibile il rumore?
grazie mille |
| sent on September 02, 2012 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Also because you have a very entry-level SLR that did not stop the villages of from 200 passes to 400 to 800 and I think 1600 (correct me if I'm wrong), 1600 and finally 3200iso. The noise is already present in the foreground but, in my opinion, does not in this shoot.
hello and good light, laurel Molto anche perchè hai una reflex entry-level che non ha le frazioni di stop: da 200 passa a 400 a 800 e mi sembra 1600 (correggimi se sbaglio) , 1600 e infine 3200iso . Il rumore è già presente in primo piano ma, secondo me, non disturba in questa ripresa.
ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on September 02, 2012 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
exact say well 200 400 800 1600 .. however it is also true is first piamo:-D esatto dici benissimo 200 400 800 1600..comunque è vero si vede pure in primo piamo |
| sent on September 02, 2012 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If the concerns more closely mirrored part is in color, the foreground emphasizes the B & N as to represent a vision of the protagonist while watching the mirror ... the noise in the surgery in the shade together with the B & N help the observer to convey attention to the figure as if it were a memory or a flash-back ... that is why this type of grain, according to me, is not annoying (indeed). hello, laurel Se la riguardi più attentamente la parte specchiata è a colori, la parte in primo piano enfatizza il B&N come a rappresentare una visione della protagonista mentre si guarda lo specchio... il rumore chirurgico nella parte in ombra unito al B&N aiutano l'osservatore a veicolare l'attenzione sulla figura come se fosse un ricordo o un flash-back ... ecco perchè questo tipo di grana ,sempre secondo me, non è fastidiosa (anzi) . ciao, lauro |
| sent on September 02, 2012 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I try to follow .. but B & N is it? cerco di seguirti..ma B&N cos'è? |
| sent on September 02, 2012 (17:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Black and White ... Black and White 8-) Bianco e Nero ... Black and White  |
| sent on September 02, 2012 (17:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
eh I thought black and white but seeing B & N I got there. :-D:-D eh pensavo a black and white ma vedendo B&N non ci sono arrivato. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
