What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 08, 2012 (18:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
f 5.6?
f 5,6?
|
| sent on October 09, 2012 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes, I was in a 70mm f5, 6 .. why? it's weird? si, ero a 70mm a f5,6..perchè? è strano? |
| sent on October 09, 2012 (22:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
do you okay? and centers that were to 70mm with f? secondo te va bene? e che centra che eri a 70mm con gli f? |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (8:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
According to me all right all right, because my goal was to isolate the little tree in the foreground holding a sail in the background, while not losing detail.
the fact that I have stated that I took the focus was only for completeness of information, because an f / at a given focal length makes it a totally different image that the same f / with a longer focal length or shorter.
In response to your comment, it is not a hard and fast rule having to use aperture to photograph a landscape, so I see no reason to submit a review of this kind, tralatro also rude. Secondo me va bene eccome, in quanto il mio intento era isolare leggermente l'albero in primo piano mantenendo una velatura sullo sfondo, pur non perdendo i dettagli.
il fatto che io abbia precisato la focale a cui ho scattato era solo per completezza dell'informazione, perchè un f/ ad una data focale rende un immagine totalmente differente che lo stesso f/ ad una focale più lunga o corta.
Rispondendo al tuo commento, non è una regola ferrea dover usare diaframma chiuso per fotografare un paesaggio, per cui non vedo il motivo di inserire un commento di questo tipo, tralatro anche sgarbato. |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
rude? my wanted to be constructive ... but it is right that you deserve all these comments for your interesting photos. sgarbato? il mio voleva essere costruttivo...comunque è giusto che ti meriti tutti questi commenti per la tua interessante foto. |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (15:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok, then I apologize. I misunderstood me. glad you like the photos .. ok, allora ti chiedo scusa. ho capito male io. felice che ti piaccia la foto.. |
| sent on June 05, 2013 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find the correct choice of the 5.6! I understand perfectly your intention and actually came at the picture! ingenious idea, trust me :) very well, a greeting! trovo corretta la scelta del 5.6 !! ho capito perfettamente la tua intenzione e in realtà è venuta bene la foto ! trovata geniale, fidati :) molto bene , un saluto ! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
