What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 15, 2016 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. Congrats!!!
Hello Marco. Molto bella,complimenti!!!
Ciao,Marco. |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (19:29) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (21:04) | This comment has been translated
Really nice, congratulations! |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fausto wow, beautiful dynamic click!
I see that you're adapting quickly to the new equipment ..
Compliments
Alan Wow Fausto, bellissimo scatto dinamico!
Vedo che ti stai adattando in fretta alla nuova attrezzatura..
Complimenti
Alan |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (22:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for passage and comments. Hello Alan, the G7 has great qualities of speed in focusing and many buttons to quickly change all the parameters that are used in nature photos without removing the 'eye from the viewfinder. Too bad for the sensor that is definitely a notch below the excellent functional characteristics of the machine. To fully test the 100-400 as optical qualities I will have to use the EM5 II. Grazie a tutti per passaggio e commenti. Ciao Alan, la G7 ha delle ottime doti di velocità nella messa a fuoco e tanti pulsanti per modificare velocemente tutti i parametri che servono nelle fotografie naturalistiche senza staccare l' occhio dal mirino. Peccato per il sensore che è decisamente una spanna sotto alle ottime caratteristiche funzionali della macchina. Per testare a fondo il 100-400 come qualità ottiche dovrò usare la EM5 II. |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (22:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So Fausto believe the sensor of the E-M5 Mark II much greater than that of the G7?
Thus also confirming you that in any case the Panasonic are fast pious operationally speaking.
Can you easily use the f-c? Quindi Fausto ritieni il sensore della e-m5 Mark II superiore di molto a quello della G7?
Quindi confermi anche tu che comunque le Panasonic sono pii veloci operativamente parlando.
Riesci ad usare agevolmente l'af-c? |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Panasonic Top have a more powerful sensor range especially in micro detail, the G7 is excellent in 'Single AF, and also works well in AF tracking, I have yet to test it enough with the' Continuous AF. The EM5 II is slower, but the sensor produces a micro detail significantly higher than the G7. Obviously it is taken into account that the G7 price is much lower. Le Panasonic Top di gamma hanno un sensore più performante soprattutto nel micro dettaglio, la G7 è ottima nell' AF singolo e funziona bene anche nel tracking AF, devo ancora provarla a sufficienza con l' AF continuo. La EM5 II è più lenta , ma il sensore produce un micro dettaglio nettamente superiore alla G7. Ovviamente va tenuto conto che il prezzo della G7 è di gran lunga inferiore. |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (23:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Probably it would take a GX8 er have the highest quality currently on Panasonic .. They say that the sensor is really good.
Have you tried just Tracking, or did you even evidence in af-c with just af point? Probabilmente ci vorrebbe una gx8 er avere la massima qualità attualmente su Panasonic.. Dicono che il sensore sia veramente buono.
Hai provato solo il tracking oppure hai fatto anche solo delle prove in af-c con un solo punto af? |
| sent on November 16, 2016 (9:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I only tried the tracking that the G7 seems more useful and usable dell 'AF-C, if it is used for nature photography.
Ho provato solo il tracking che sulla G7 mi sembra più utile e utilizzabile dell' AF-C , se è utilizzato per la fotografia naturalistica.
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
