What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 23, 2016 (7:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There is hardly a situation like this. interesting shot! Difficilmente si trova una situazione cosi. Scatto interessante! |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (10:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful sight, a situation that absolutely deserved the shot. He deserved maybe even a little 'more attention, especially considering the title, I do not understand the reason for slightly off the bell tower of the center of the X. Forgive my sincerity and hard but ... post production is a must reconsider, a disaster: - | Hello! Bel colpo d'occhio, una situazione che meritava assolutamente lo scatto. Meritava forse anche un po' più di attenzione, soprattutto considerando il titolo, non comprendo la ragione per aver leggermente decentrato il campanile rispetto al centro della X. Perdona la mia sincerità e durezza ma...la post produzione è assolutamente da riconsiderare, un disastro ciao! |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Look for better reaching the steeple would have had to move the planes, but Beppe think I've put the strips in post production ??? How is it and 'coming' is idea ?? :) Those are two strips of two aircraft that are crisscrossed by accident, by chance over the tip of the bell tower and by chance I passed e.ho of them tripped, or was moving so the bell or was moving planes or taroccavo the photos to make all the cool things that I could not or did not want, a hug. Marco :) Guarda che per centrare meglio il campanile avrei dovuto spostare gli aerei, ma che pensi Beppe che abbia messo le strisce in post produzione??? Come ti e' venuta 'sta idea?? :) Quelle sono due strisce di due aerei che per caso si sono intersecati, per caso sopra la punta del campanile e per caso io passavo di li e.ho scattato, quindi o spostavo il campanile o spostavo gli aerei o taroccavo la foto per fare il figo tutte cose che non potevo o non volevo fare, un abbraccio. Marco :) |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marco, I never thought that the photo was fake, I meant that doing a little 'more attention during shooting you could sell its bell tower in the x, that's all, it seems to me not impossible, indeed, it would be enough to move a step in the right direction. Hello Marco, non ho mai pensato che la foto fosse finta, intendevo dire che facendo un po' più di attenzione in fase di scatto avresti potuto collocare il campanile proprio sotto la x, tutto qui, non mi sembra una cosa impossibile, anzi, sarebbe bastato spostarsi di qualche passo nella direzione giusta. Ciao |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (18:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No Beppe see how the sky was a very windy winter day, and when I hit the strips were moving already 'in the opposite direction and moved away from the bell tower and then then what hits the post ??? Vabbeh by not 'a problem the next time lighthouse' better;) hello and good evening. Marco No Beppe come vedi dal cielo era una giornata invernale molto ventosa e quando mi sono accorto delle strisce si stavano muovendo gia' in direzione opposta e si allontanavano dal campanile e poi allora cosa centra la post??? Vabbeh dai non e' un problema la prossima volta faro' di meglio ;) ciao e buona serata. Marco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |