RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
marzamemi 2...

Le mie foto

View gallery (15 photos)

marzamemi 2 sent on August 13, 2016 (16:33) by Carlod5200. 6 comments, 351 views.

at 105mm, 1/80 f/8.0, ISO 800, hand held.




View High Resolution 1.5 MP  

1 person like it: Nemesi9191


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on August 13, 2016 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quality 'of bad image. I do not know if they are the ISO, the diaphragm which causes diffraction (but f8 on ODA should not be a problem) or PP (I would exclude the fire but boh ...).
It appears in my view a photo "remember" where there is' a subject uninteresting and composition "absent"

avatarsenior
sent on August 13, 2016 (19:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree with the opinion expressed by Yaaa. Classic postcard. Technically, too, leaves much to be desired. There is the shake-, attributable to the low exposure time. Yet the light was not lacking. An iso somewhat 'higher and there would be no problems.

avatarsenior
sent on August 13, 2016 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It lacks clarity and detail in this photo and also the colors are a bit 'debolucci. In terms of composition I would cut a bit 'of the sea and moved framing a left sleeping not to cut the wall of the house on the left.

avatarjunior
sent on August 13, 2016 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Perhaps the time is below the safety threshold?

avatarjunior
sent on August 13, 2016 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I had to do a lower time

avatarsenior
sent on August 14, 2016 (10:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think so, even if the stabilizer was supposed to help.


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me