What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 21, 2012 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
looking out the back focus ... perhaps the flamingo in the foreground and 'too contrasty, but it' s nice though. bello il fuori fuoco posteriore... forse il fenicottero in primo piano e' troppo contrastato,ma e' bella comunque. |
| sent on August 23, 2012 (8:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Rossano hello, yes .. in fact also gave me the idea .. I tried to improve it but I could not reduce it .. thanks for the comment! ciao Rossano, si.. in effetti anche a me dava quell'idea.. ho provato a migliorarla ma non sono riuscito a ridurlo.. grazie per il commento! |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (15:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful moment caught Bello il momento colto |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Rossano, also hangs on the horizon ...... Concordo con Rossano, inoltre l'orizzonte pende...... |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (16:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the steps! as I said I agree with myself .. Rossano I would say that the horizon is wanted, straightening I would put in position to climb the flamingo .. at that time was "landing" .. Berne thanks anyway for the comment! Grazie per i passaggi! come detto sono d'accordo io stesso con Rossano.. per l'orizzonte direi che è voluto, raddrizzandolo avrei messo in posizione a salire il fenicottero.. in quel momento stava "atterrando".. grazie comunque Berna per il commento! |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (17:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I would say that the horizon is wanted, straightening I would put in position to climb the flamingo .. „
The Earth 'on the bubble, was the camera to be tilted, so the location of the flamingo was not what you see in your photo. ;-) " per l'orizzonte direi che è voluto, raddrizzandolo avrei messo in posizione a salire il fenicottero.. "
La Terra e' in bolla, era la fotocamera ad essere inclinata, quindi la posizione del fenicottero non era quella che si vede nella tua foto. |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (19:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice ... I agree on the slope. Molto bella...concordo sulla pendenza. |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (20:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good ottima |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (0:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice and colorful! molto bella e colorata! |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (7:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Max57, actually I said a heresy .. completely agree with what you say! thanks
and thanks to everyone for the comments! ciao Max57, effettivamente ho detto un eresia.. completamente d'accordo con quello che dici! grazie
e grazie a tutti per i commenti! |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (8:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
.. I was now thinking, the horizon was not directly in front of me, a little moved, and maybe that's because it's wrong .. no? I honestly do not remember exactly the point of shooting .. I was on a boat and I remember "cut" across the river, so some degree the Earth could not be leveled (I keep saying heresies or could it be possible?) thank you very much to all!
.. stavo ora pensando, l'orizzonte non era direttamente di fronte a me, un po spostato e forse ecco perchè è storta.. no? onestamente non ricordo con precisione il punto di ripresa.. io ero su una barca e ricordo di aver "tagliato" il fiume trasversalmente, di conseguenza qualche grado la Terra potrebbe non risultare in bolla (continuo a dire eresie o potrebbe essere possibile?) grazie mille a tutti!
|
| sent on October 11, 2012 (8:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Max57 no, absolutely .. I was just trying to understand .. you're right .. but if you start with the camera straight in front of you, the land in front of you is perfectly aligned, if you move to the right or left without turning the machine (the same horizontal plane), if you have a straight horizon, but the land close, almost by force, the earth will see it wrong, do you agree? I do not know if I can explain what I mean .. but absolutely do not want to make a controversy or annoy someone .. just a thought .. no Max57, assolutamente.. stavo solo cercando di capire.. hai ragione.. ma se parti con la macchina fotografica dritta davanti a te, la terra di fronte a te è perfettamente allineata, se ti sposto a dx o a sx senza girare la macchina (stesso piano orizzontale), se non hai un orizzonte dritto, ma della terra ferma vicina, quasi per forza la terra la vedrai storta, sei d'accordo? non so se riesco a spiegare cosa vorrei dire.. ma assolutamente non voglio fare polemiche o dar fastidio a qualcuno.. è solo un pensiero.. |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (9:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But imagine! In the case of a river in perspective, but in your case and the bank 'and similar far horizon, so it can not' be tilted ever.
In broad terms this meant: the bank can 'be wrong but the horizon straight ...
Here I exaggerated the concept:
Ma figurati! Nel caso delle rive di un fiume in prospettiva si, ma nel tuo caso la sponda e' lontana e assimilabile all'orizzonte, quindi non puo' essere inclinata mai.
A grandi linee intendevo questo: la riva puo' essere storta ma l'orizzonte ...dritto
Qui ho esasperato il concetto:
|
| sent on October 11, 2012 (10:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Daccordissimo with you .. thank you very much for being so clear, you can just attach too 2 photos with another situation. thanks AndreaV Daccordissimo con te.. grazie mille per essere stato cosi chiaro, appena riesco ti allego anche io 2 foto con un'altra situazione. grazie AndreaV |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (10:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
no, I can not enter the picture. however, as a matter of "stortezza" of the machine, perspective (maybe?) and my little mastery of photography in general, the picture is distorted. Thanks to all for the comments and practical examples for letting me know (I'm a bit hard? hehe). I hope to straighten aim and shoot the best photo .. thank you again! niente, non riesco ad inserire le foto. comunque per una questione di "stortezza" della macchina, di prospettiva (forse?) e poca padronanza mia della fotografia in generale, la foto è storta. grazie a tutti per i commenti ed esempi pratici per avermelo fatto capire (sono un po duro? eheh). spero di riuscire a raddrizzare la mira e scattare delle migliori foto.. grazie ancora! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
