What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user2112 | sent on January 07, 2016 (22:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Too bad the focus falls in front of the subject and not on the eye ;-) Peccato che il fuoco cada davanti al soggetto e non sull'occhio  |
| sent on January 08, 2016 (21:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In this case, if you look carefully the maf falls on eye and little head woodpecker, which are at the same level of the cortex you see fire. The body is out of focus because it is on a plane back ;-) in questo caso se guardi bene la maf cade sull'occhio e sulla testolina del picchio, che sono allo stesso livello della corteccia che vedi a fuoco. Il corpo è fuori fuoco perchè è su un piano posteriore |
user2112 | sent on January 08, 2016 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you want to "be right" then ... take off the HD version! -D Se vuoi "avere ragione" allora ... togli la versione in HD!  |
| sent on January 09, 2016 (11:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not even look in hd .. However did you bring me doubt and I made the adjustment with the focus chart and noticed a front focus of about +4 now I corrected! Thank you! A me non sembra nemmeno in hd.. Comunque mi hai fatto venire il dubbio e ho fatto la taratura con la focus chart e ho notato un front focus di ca +4 che adesso ho corretto! Grazie! |
| sent on January 09, 2016 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You could have / should have used the TC, or did you already sold? -D
I agree and would add that the front-focus version in HD we see a clumsy clean-up of the background noise, it was much better to leave ;-) Avresti potuto/dovuto usare il TC, o lo hai già rivenduto?
Concordo sul front-focus ed aggiungo che nella versione in HD si vede una maldestra ripulitura dello sfondo dal rumore, era molto meglio lasciarlo |
| sent on January 09, 2016 (20:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the tc have not used it because I did not need. As for the noise from the background it is true, for the little that was I could leave. il tc non l'ho usato perché non mi serviva. Per quanto riguarda il rumore dallo sfondo è vero, per il poco che era potevo lasciarlo. |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (17:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find it pleasant colors and composition even if set too.
And 'evident maf early, I hope the microtaratura have fixed the problem. 8-)
If you have the option of using a 1.4x extender you would avoid using crop pushed because we are not always lucky to have small parties and neighbors.
(Imho)
Hello, Lauro Trovo piacevoli i colori e la composizione anche se troppo ambientata.
E' evidente una maf anticipata , spero che la microtaratura abbia sistemato il problema. 
Se hai la possibilità di usare un extender 1.4x ti eviterebbe di usare crop spinti dato che non sempre siamo fortunati ad avere soggetti piccoli e vicini.
(imho)
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on January 22, 2016 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks laurel, now maf is in place! Grazie lauro, ora la maf è a posto! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
