What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 14, 2012 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
unfortunately a female (without tail) but hard to focus on the MAF tiny nose ... what do you think? purtroppo un esemplare femmina (senza coda) ma che fatica concentrare la MAF sul piccolissimo muso... che ne dite? |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but is not a scorpion fly? ma non è una mosca scorpione? |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Perhaps the scorpion fly moving and that is why the sharpness is lost. Forse la mosca scorpione si muoveva ed è per questo che la nitidezza viene a mancare. |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (16:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry pigi. I do not understand. I concentrated MAF on the snout. unfortunately the depth of field was the one that was ... Scusa pigi. non capisco. ho concentrato la MAF sul muso. purtroppo la profondità di campo era quella che era... |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello I see the micro moved, the area of ??Maf was right ... complete with shooting data is best understood ;) Hello Ciao vedo anch'io del micro mosso , la zona di Maf era giusta...con i dati di scatto completi si comprende meglio ;) Ciao |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (17:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
forget it! it is seen that it is camouflaged ;-) come non detto! si vede che si è camuffata |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (20:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I have concentrated MAF on the snout. Unfortunately, the depth of field was what it was ... „ I did not say that you did not focus your attention on the face of the subject, but if you look at the HR version you should notice that the nose is unclear, probably because the fly has moved. The pdc did not affect at all the goodness of the shot, or so little that it was if you had finally resulted in a sharp pinpoint one could argue whether this was more or less adequate, but it does not seem so to me. I do not know what aperture you shot since it does not appear the shooting data, but I assure you it is not a problem of pdc. " ho concentrato la MAF sul muso. purtroppo la profondità di campo era quella che era..." Non ho detto che tu non abbia concentrato la tua attenzione sul muso del soggetto, però se osservi la versione HR dovresti notare che il muso non è nitido, probabilmente perchè la mosca si è mossa. La pdc non ha influito minimamente sulla bontà dello scatto, tanta o poca che fosse se tu avessi avuto come risultato finale un punto nitido si sarebbe potuto discutere se questa era più o meno sufficiente, ma così a me non sembra. Non so con che diaframma hai scattato visto che non appaiono i dati di scatto, però ti assicuro che non è un problema di pdc. |
| sent on June 15, 2012 (10:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Venia ask! Scorpion fly! I vatto bedlam with another "hybrid" ... :) Thanks for the comments. actually looking at 100% is noted, however, the shake ... this is what happens with the HD! :-D Chiedo Venia!!! Mosca scorpione!!! ho vatto confuzione con un altro "ibrido"... :) Grazie per i commenti. in effetti osservando al 100% si nota comunque del micromosso... ecco cosa succede con gli HD!!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |