JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 12, 2016 (15:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately, the free hand has not forgiven you. The time used does not give you too much of tolerance space since using a 300, you should get at least a similar or longer. Undoubtedly he would have to play with lifting her sensitivity. Better a photo a bit 'noisy rather than blurred. The prospect selection with the use of the diaphragm used should have lead you to the choice of a subject point maybe body and wing, or the same flower as the pdc could not be extensive, but even here you had to make a choice between time and diaphragm while changing the sensitivity. The light falling on the flower is a bit 'high, it would be appropriate compensation. All wrapped in a better composition. Now all of this to make you understand how important the use of the tripod where with this attrezzo time would not be a problem. Hopefully if the flash returned evil he could help, where artificial light could give you faster times. Purtroppo il mano libera non ti ha perdonato. Il tempo utilizzato non ti da troppo spazio di tolleranza visto che utilizzi un 300, avresti dovuto ottenere almeno un tempo simile o maggiore. Indubbiamente si sarebbe dovuto giocare con la sensibilità alzandola. Meglio una foto un po' rumorosa piuttosto che poco nitida. La prospettiva scelta con l'utilizzo del diaframma usato avrebbe dovuto indurti alla scelta di un punto del soggetto forse corpo ed ala, oppure lo stesso fiore visto che la pdc non poteva risultare molto estesa, ma anche quì si doveva fare una scelta tra tempo e diaframma pur modificando la sensibilità. La luminosità che cade sul fiore è un po' elevata, sarebbe stato opportuno una compensazione. Il tutto inserito in una migliore composizione. Ora tutto questo per farti capire quanto importante sia l'uso del cavalletto dove con questo attrezzo il tempo non sarebbe stato un problema. Eventualmente se quest'ultimo ti tornasse male un flash avrebbe potuto aiutarti,dove la luce artificiale poteva regalarti tempi più veloci.
sent on February 18, 2016 (13:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As I said before I did not have the flash stand it because I had other intentions and coming back I happened to be photographed this specimen that moved continuously. Thanks for Pigi47 advice. Come detto Prima non avevo il cavalletto ne il flash perche avevo altre intenzioni e tornando indietro mi è capitato questo esemplare da fotografare che si spostava in continuazione. Grazie dei consigli Pigi47.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
