Rosa Rosae 2 | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

Resize to fit window

Visioni d'insieme View gallery (14 photos)

Rosa Rosae 2 sent on May 22, 2015 (15:02) by Nordend4612. 5 comments, 405 views.

, 1/2500 f/2.0, ISO 800, hand held.

9 persons like it: Ardian, Giulietta Cazzaro, Giuseppe Guadagno, Japandrea, LucianoSerra.d, Nonnachecca, Paolo P, Saverio Arcieri, Vittorio Scatolini

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Pigi47

sent on May 29, 2015 (12:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I see a little 'soft and underexposed.

Nordend4612

sent on May 29, 2015 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Pigi47. First of all thanks for the welcome comments; I never took photos to flowers not as per document. This shot I did with 135L to f2, I tried to quit, but I liked the tone soft data from the grand opening. Probably I should have a macro lens to be able to bring more and more to close the aperture (alas, I had no tripod with me), giving a uniform sharpness in all the roses and not only in the central part.
Underexposed? I looked at the histogram and it does not seem likely with the soft light of evening there are some darker areas. I also tried to use the flash but I was not convinced. What do you say?
Thanks again and good photos. ;-)
Hello.

Davide

Giulietta Cazzaro

sent on September 09, 2015 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You have declined the photos in a soft and romantic ... I love it !!
They look a bit 'backlit and buy an air of mystery .... the blurred background is very nice too :-P

Giuseppe Guadagno

sent on September 09, 2015 (16:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Soft and romantic these roses with a background very nice.
Hello.

Nordend4612

sent on September 09, 2015 (22:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks and thanks Juliet Joseph, the idea was in fact portray roses in a romantic and intimate .... exploiting the beautiful fuzzy 135L. Even if they are part of a series of tests these shots I liked a lot and I wanted to post them, I'm glad you like them. Thank you! Hello. David

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.