Bird | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

6.1 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Uccelli View gallery (6 photos)

Bird sent on March 13, 2015 (11:52) by Pakky. 4 comments, 677 views.

, 1/800 f/5.6, ISO 800, hand held.

View High Resolution 6.1 MP

4 persons like it: Albertopantellini, Asso52, Gpierocompostela, Remo Bonaretti

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

user19955

sent on March 14, 2015 (0:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

With the title made me really laugh out loud !!! :-D:-D
I wanted you to also comlplimenti for this shot because, though not beautiful, with a MAF so-so and the subject a little messed up from the branches, makes you about the equipment used. The 70/300 I own and I used to shoot several birds unfortunately, like the body, shows on these occasions all its limitations. Do not give up sooner or later one best shot you get it, just persevere.
Hello

Pakky

sent on March 14, 2015 (11:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well I'm glad I made you laugh. :-)
Those Birds are all shots from balcony of my parents' house.
I'll tell you that I have no idea what name this bird has therefore decided for the common name of volatile.
Look at the reality of the machine are satisfied because in normal lighting conditions works very well.
However, when the push shoty details in low light manifests all its limitations. The combination with the 70/300 unfortunately is not the best, are the shots with a sharpness ridiculous, perhaps because they are a bit 'too prevented.
Thanks for the ride greetings Henry.

user19955

sent on March 14, 2015 (11:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In birds, from personal experience going from D3100 to D7000, the important thing is the speed with which the whole body and lens focuses precisely the subject. Certainly, however, that you can not have everything at prices humans; if we speak of bodies and lenses pro is another matter.
Hello

Pakky

sent on March 14, 2015 (14:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Clear the 7000 is much more powerful and it is obvious that if you use stuff from 3000 EUR things change the same shot is more accurate and pleasant.
But trying to get the most with what you have. :-):-):-)
Hello

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.