What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 11, 2012 (19:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella! Sin dfavvero to blur the two boys, with their catches would have been perfect, excellent management silohuette! Hello. Bella! Peccato dfavvero per il mosso dei due ragazzini, con loro fermi sarebbe stata perfetta, ottima gestione della silohuette! Ciao. |
| sent on March 12, 2012 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello silohuette interesting, I wanted to ask if the research moved in subjects is desired, because otherwise you could get the stationary subjects with faster and a wider aperture Ciao silohuette interessante , volevo chiederti se la ricerca del mosso nei soggetti è voluta, perché altrimenti avresti potuto ottenere i soggetti fermi con tempi più rapidi ed un diaframma più aperto |
| sent on March 12, 2012 (16:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nordend4612 and Figu, thanks for the steps, actually share your thoughts if you had opened a little 'I got a diaphragm shutter speed faster with the result of not having moved on two people. The reason for the small aperture is that my focus was directed to get a little 'blurring of the sea; This is probably fine if the subject is static, such as rock or a log, where the subject is in motion ( as in this case) the consideration had to be different.
Nordend4612 e Figu, grazie per i passaggi, effettivamente condivido le vostre considerazioni; se avessi aperto un po' il diaframma avrei ottenuto un tempo di scatto più rapido con il risultato di non avere il mosso sulle due persone. Il motivo del diaframma chiuso é che la mia concentrazione era rivolta ad ottenere un po' di effetto mosso del mare; probabilmente questo va bene se il soggetto é statico, come delle rocce o un tronco, nel caso in cui il soggetto é in movimento (come in questo caso) la considerazione doveva essere diversa.
|
| sent on March 12, 2012 (19:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Perhaps the only way to get both would have been to make two shots and merge them into PP, but in this way the photo became a little unnatural. However, I also like the shot so :-) Forse l'unico modo per ottenere entrambi sarebbe stato quello di realizzare due scatti ed unirli in PP, però in questo modo la foto diventava un po innaturale. Comunque lo scatto mi piace anche cosi  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
