JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on September 19, 2014 (8:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I realize that the free hand has difficulties in obtaining good results on sharpness, unfortunately this is one of those cases. The sensitivity value used to obtain the possibility of the shot you can see it all in very high noise. Probably the use of a tripod would have avoided that allowing slower shutter speeds with less high sensitivity. Mi rendo conto che il mano libera abbia delle difficoltà nell'ottenere buoni risultati sulla nitidezza, purtroppo questo è uno di quei casi. Il valore di sensibilità usato per ottenere la possibilità dello scatto lo si nota tutto nel rumore molto elevato. Probabilmente l'uso di un cavalletto avrebbe evitato ciò permettendoti tempi più lenti con sensibilità meno elevate.
sent on September 20, 2014 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Pigi47, thanking you for your welcome comments, I wanted to express my thoughts. I fully realize that my photos are not perfect with butterflies in fire and noise. But I prefer to photograph butterflies without artifice, spraying them with water etc. ... for without them and they can be photographed with a tripod, I prefer to take them in their natural environment and they certainly are not waiting for me to mount the tripod. I see on Jusa photos of butterflies in sharp focus, they look like mummies, full of droplets and photomontages to make them perfectly still. To me it's like the hunter who goes to look for prey with their dogs in complete freedom in the woods than a hunter who goes in reserve only to shoot a prey stops and bred in captivity. Ciao Pigi47, ringraziandoti per i tuoi graditi commenti, volevo esprimere il mio pensiero. Mi rendo perfettamente conto che le mie foto con farfalle non sono perfette nel fuoco e nel rumore. Io però preferisco fotografare le farfalle senza gli artifici, spruzzandole con l'acqua ecc... per averle ferme e poterle fotografare con il cavalletto, preferisco prenderle nel loro ambiente naturale e loro certo non stanno ad aspettare che io monti il cavalletto. Vedo su Jusa delle foto di farfalle perfettamente a fuoco, sembrano delle mummie, piene di goccioline e fotomontaggi per renderle perfettamente ferme. Per me è come cacciatore che va a cercarsi le prede con il proprio cane in piena libertà nei boschi rispetto a un cacciatore che va in riserva solamente per sparare ad una preda ferma e allevata in cattività.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
