JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on April 30, 2012 (21:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry but I am not convinced by these reasons: - Blurred, there are difficulty setting to understand where is the maf fall - Eyes (very important) not sharp - Position of the subject ... looking to the right so you have to recompose holding left hello and good light, laurel scusami ma non mi convince per questi motivi: - poco nitida , ci sono dificoltà a capire dove è caduta la maf - occhi (importantissimi)non nitidi - posizione del soggetto... guardava a dx quindi dovevi ricomporre tenendolo a sinistra ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on May 02, 2012 (20:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I know and accept all the criticism on a site so that I imagined would come out .. the photo is one of the first that I did years ago with my first SLR .. I do not know anything about it how to compose photos I knew what was the maf .. so you can understand that ignoramus that I was wrong .. the machine I is not the 7d but my first 400d with sigma lens that by the time that is .. anyway by covering after year I do not mind .. thanks anyway and I am glad of the advice that you gave me. ;-) Lo so e accetto tutte le critiche che immaginavo su un sito cosi sarebbero venute fuori..la foto è una delle prime che ho fatto anni fa con la mia prima reflex..non sapevo niente ne come comporre le foto ne sapevo cos'era la maf..quindi puoi capire che ignorantone che ero..la macchina ho sbagliato non è la 7d ma la mia prima 400d con l'ottica sigma che da il tempo che trova..comunque riguardandola dopo anni non mi dispiace..grazie comunque e sono felice dei consigli che mi hai dato.
sent on May 02, 2012 (22:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ot the canon 400d is also interesting today, experience with the sigma ... to forget 8-) o.t. la canon 400d è interessante anche oggi, l'esperienza con il sigma ... è da dimenticare
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
