RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Aurora Borealis, Norway, 2013, 016 374

 
Aurora Borealis, Norway, 2013, 016 374...

Norvegia 2013

View gallery (15 photos)

Aurora Borealis, Norway, 2013, 016 374 sent on January 10, 2013 (10:22) by Juza. 72 comments, 39903 views.

, 30 sec f/2.8, ISO 3200, tripod. Lofoten islands, Norway.

#AuroraBoreale #NightPhotos #NorthernLights

Buy Usage License  

286 persons like it: Cucjanji, 35mm, 66tasca, A.rizzi, Abed.kh, Adi, Adriano_portolan, Adrimas51, Agphoto, Agripsa, Aitak100, AlbeeBoo, Alberto Migliore, Aldred, AleIarpini, Alessandro Risso, Alessandro Riva, Alessandro Sozzi, Alex Dorio, Alvise72, Andrea Cacciari, Andrea Miceli, Andrea3074, Andreamarchese, Andreascaffidi, Andro Photos, Andy111, Anedar, Angelo Adorisio, Angelo Butera, Angelo Jesus, Anto55, Anto71, Antonelli Giovanni, Antonellig, Antonio Aleo, Aringhe Blu, Arya, Bal, Batcaius, Batt, Beppe Reda, Biomeccanico, Botti, Camoscio, Carlez91, Carlo Gandolfo - Spinotto, Ciamorc, Corra, Costabile, Dallepiatte, Damy, Daniel Florea, Daniele Atzori, Danielet., Danilo Molinari, Danus78, Dany Gw, Davide Dutto, Davide Espertini, Davide Gadda, Davide86otranto, Davidzampieri, Dazzy, Dede66, Denny76, Diego Giacomuzzi, Diego49, Dinocelle, Diprimadamiano, Domenico, Ecka, Elnene, Enrico Maggi, Enrico Pini, Enricor69, Enzonic, Eragon, Erbedo, Erica Boschetto, Erin, Fabio Bergonzoni, Fabio Spinoni, Fabiopgs, Fabiopisciotta, Fabry, Falconfab, Federico Barbieri, Fire74, Formha, Fotomistico, Fragnsim, Francesco Abbate, Francesco Agostini, Francesco C, Francesco Cassulo, Franco B, Franco Giannattasio, Franz67, Fulcontact, Gabriele Marco Bianco, Gabriele Prato, Gabry95, Gaetano Perego, GaetanoGiampagliaPhoto, Gaia Alessandro , Gayak, Gciambriello, Giacomo Marchetti, Giacox81, Giancarlo Priore, Gianluca Podestà, Gianni Beciani, Gianni Savoldi, Gigi Tov, Gigibz, Giomi517, Giorgio Vannucci, Giovanni17, Gramilu, Gregor, Gtabbi, Guido Chiodi, Guido G., Hamed2240, Harlock1967, Ingdax76, Ivancosta, Ivospan, Jacopo94, Jahromi, Jarmila, Jdf, Jerry Vacchieri, Joe Popò, Johnjz, Jokier, Kermit58, Kiccop, Kimera69, Laikino, Lamagra, Lince, Loredana, Luca Alessi, Luca Bradipo, Luca Carlini, Luca Casaril, Luca Costa, Luca Ghetti, Luca.serravalli, Luca1984, Lucaluca, Lucaphoto, Luciano Scardigli, Luigi Bassi, Lully, M.ago, M3ndoza, Mac89, Mago77, Maia, Manrico1, Manuel68, Manuela Preziosi, Marco Masotti, Marco Mercuri, Marco Moffa, Marco Orlandino, Marco Pizzini, Marco Riccardi, Marcoc, Marcopatt, Marcophotographer, Maria Laura Spini, Maridana, Mario Balboni, Martinclimber, Marwelik, Mar_bo, Massimiliano Turchetti, Massimo Coizzi Fotografia, Massimoeos, Matisse02, Matteotellini, Mattfala, Mau51, Maurizio Attiani, Max010, Max73, Maxlaz66, Maxperrini, Maxspin73, Maxt, Maxwolf64, Michele Morosini, Mikethebiker, Momo, Mordilloz, Multicolor, Nadir Francesco Capoccia, Nando Photo, Nerone, Nicola Montanari, Nicola Valsecchi, Nike, Nitrusoxide, Nordend4612, N_i_c_o, Orso70, Panleo1, Paolo66, Pasquale Giovine, Patty1954, Peppe Cancellieri, Phil, Photovalentine, Pibla, Picco Paolo, Piergiorgio, Piermaria Zannier, Pierpaolo C., Pmaffio, Povermac, Predozzi, Qpix, Quellolà, Raffaeletrek, Ravell, Remedy, Roberto 7d, Roberto Coppiardi, Roberto Paneroni, Roberto Vacca, Roberto.d, Roberto1977, Robi98, Robybinfa, Rogerspina, Romolo Angelini, Ros1, Rosamaria Bidoli, Roscioli Matteo, Rslfnc, Ruben.Reggiani, Salvob, Samuele Gallini, Sanja, Sara89, Saro, Saroukai, Sasasicilyuno, Shamano954, Slawek, Sler9088, Slowste, Smvo61, Sorpry, Spidergreen, Stebiscio, Stefania Saffioti, Stefano Coghene, Stefano3112, StefanoMoretti, Sweeping, Terrestre Extra, TheBlackbird, Thrash_paul, Tobia, Tpxa, Valentina72, Vasile Gori, Vegeta0120, Verghera, Victor76, Vincenzo92, Vittorio Busatto, Vittorio Veneziani, VittorioDs, Volo, Walter Colombo, Walter Serafini, Walter.raponi, Wildvideo, Wussuw, Zman




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2013 (18:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful stars and green northern lights!

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Photo truly impressive and charming, congratulations Juza. :-D

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2013 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2013 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Juza great!

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (19:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

For me it is beautiful!
I piacerebe one day I try to make some as well in those places!
Juza Bravo! :-)

avatarsupporter
sent on January 10, 2013 (19:35)

Oh wow...! Magic is in the air !!!;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on January 10, 2013 (19:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO SAY TO LOOK AND ADMIRE IN SILENCE. WONDERFUL ATMOSPHERE,

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2013 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What a sight, congratulations!

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2013 (20:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Bellissima!

If I may make a criticism, so artificial lights burned and mixed together a little disturbing. '
A double exposure solve the problem! :-)

ISO 3200 and not hear! :-)

EDIT: I read now your comment about the lights:-D

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (21:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful, the sky is semlpicemente fabulous, but the city lights a little disturbing ;-)
Greetings Walter.

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2013 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Dear Juza ... did not you used 7d with lenses compatible? in part the jokes photo stupendous ;-) ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (22:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

" Instead of making a double exposure I left the lights of the city became burned because I liked the effect, almost like an explosion of light "! I fully agree on this choice: a small artificial light, the immense natural splendor!

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (23:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Pure entertainment as always, dear Emmanuel, thank you for your work.

avatarsenior
sent on January 11, 2013 (0:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

a lens that costs as much as the 16-35 is inadmissible a result like this: distortion and vignetting at the highest level, the very megli ciofegon plasticotto 18-55 .... and costs 30 euro ...

PS.
still great because I was in doubt whether to buy it or not, and I would say not!

avatarsupporter
sent on January 11, 2013 (0:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Mah. The victory of the 'enthusiasm.

Objective is not up to the task, highlight annoying, embarrassing sharpness at the edges ... The subject, considering the simplicity 'of being shot with tripod and the time available, deserves much more'. The beauty of the place save part of the 'execution.

I envy the holiday, adventure, car, and enthusiasm, as well admit of being pesantuccio and provocative, but we did not. We look forward to the next photo.

Greetings
Walter

avatarsenior
sent on January 11, 2013 (3:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like Emanuele, the sky is wonderful and the mix between dawn and starry sky clouds is superb ... the composition is not the best but in these cases it is very difficult to compose and still a bit disappointed because only the lower part of the mountain creates a 'diagonal interesting to me ... the high lights of the city do not disturb and even agree with you on' notion of an explosion ... the optical yield is rather disappointing but this was known and it is not your fault ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2013 (5:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great photos!!

I dare spectacular!

But the lights of the town????

perhaps disturb you??
Great Great

avatarsenior
sent on January 11, 2013 (5:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

More than just an explosion looks like a real fire and also because that group of clouds that starts from up there looks like the smoke of a fire .... for the rest I do not know I personally like

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2013 (12:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful picture like all the rest ... I doubt, however, is: what was the need for the camera, with that goal, with 30 "shutter speed with a tripod" shoot "the ISO to 3200?

user1856
avatar
sent on January 11, 2013 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

a lens that costs as much as the 16-35 is inadmissible a result like this: distortion and vignetting at the highest level, the very megli ciofegon plasticotto 18-55 .... and costs 30 euro ...


the ciofegon can not be used in these conditions (angle of view, aperture used, 2.8 etc) then the speech is irrelevant, right? ;-)




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me