What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 10, 2013 (18:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful stars and green northern lights! Bellissime le stelle e il verde dell'aurora boreale! |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photo truly impressive and charming, congratulations Juza. :-D Foto veramente impressionante e suggestiva, complimenti Juza. |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful ;-) bella |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Juza great! Grande Juza!! |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (19:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me it is beautiful! I piacerebe one day I try to make some as well in those places! Juza Bravo! :-) Per me è bellissima! Mi piacerebe un giorno provare a farne qualcuna pure io in quei posti! Bravo Juza! |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (19:35)
Oh wow...! Magic is in the air !!! |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (19:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO SAY TO LOOK AND ADMIRE IN SILENCE. WONDERFUL ATMOSPHERE, NON SAPREI COSA DIRE, DA GUARDARE ED AMMIRARE IN SILENZIO. ATMOSFERA STUPENDA, |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a sight, congratulations! Che spettacolo, complimenti! |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (21:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful, the sky is semlpicemente fabulous, but the city lights a little disturbing ;-) Greetings Walter. Molto bella,il cielo è semlpicemente favoloso, però le luci della città un poco disturbano Saluti Walter. |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Dear Juza ... did not you used 7d with lenses compatible? in part the jokes photo stupendous ;-) ;-) Caro Juza... non usavi 7d con lenti compatibili? a parte le battute foto stupenda |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (22:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
" Instead of making a double exposure I left the lights of the city became burned because I liked the effect, almost like an explosion of light "! I fully agree on this choice: a small artificial light, the immense natural splendor! " Invece di fare una doppia esposizione ho lasciato che le luci della città diventassero bruciate perchè mi piaceva l'effetto, quasi come se fosse un'esplosione di luce "! Concordo pienamente su questa scelta: una piccola luce artificiale, nell'immenso splendore naturale! |
| sent on January 10, 2013 (23:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pure entertainment as always, dear Emmanuel, thank you for your work. Spettacolo puro come sempre, caro Emanuele, grazie per i tuoi lavori. |
| sent on January 11, 2013 (0:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a lens that costs as much as the 16-35 is inadmissible a result like this: distortion and vignetting at the highest level, the very megli ciofegon plasticotto 18-55 .... and costs 30 euro ...
PS. still great because I was in doubt whether to buy it or not, and I would say not! da un obiettivo che costa quanto il 16-35 è inammissibile un risultato come questo: deformazione e vignettatura ai massimi livelli, molto megli il ciofegon plasticotto 18-55....e costa 30 euro... PS. comunque ottimo perchè ero in dubbio se comprarlo o meno, e direi proprio di no! |
| sent on January 11, 2013 (0:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mah. The victory of the 'enthusiasm.
Objective is not up to the task, highlight annoying, embarrassing sharpness at the edges ... The subject, considering the simplicity 'of being shot with tripod and the time available, deserves much more'. The beauty of the place save part of the 'execution.
I envy the holiday, adventure, car, and enthusiasm, as well admit of being pesantuccio and provocative, but we did not. We look forward to the next photo.
Greetings Walter Mah.. La vittoria dell' entusiasmo. Obiettivo non all'altezza della situazione, alte luci fastidiose, nitidezza ai bordi imbarazzante... Il soggetto, considerando la semplicita' della fase di scatto con treppiede e per il tempo a disposizione, meriterebbe molto di piu'. La bellezza del posto salva parzialmente l' esecuzione. Invidio la vacanza, l'avventura, l'auto e l'entusiasmo, ammetto pure di essere pesantuccio e provocatorio,ma non ci siamo. Attendiamo le prossime foto. Saluti Walter |
| sent on January 11, 2013 (3:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like Emanuele, the sky is wonderful and the mix between dawn and starry sky clouds is superb ... the composition is not the best but in these cases it is very difficult to compose and still a bit disappointed because only the lower part of the mountain creates a 'diagonal interesting to me ... the high lights of the city do not disturb and even agree with you on' notion of an explosion ... the optical yield is rather disappointing but this was known and it is not your fault ;-) a me piace Emanuele , il cielo è meraviglioso ed il mix tra aurora , cielo stellato e nuvole è superbo ... la compo non è il massimo ma in questi casi è veramente difficile comporre e comunque delude un pò solo la parte bassa perchè la montagna crea un' interessante diagonale...a me le alti luci della città non disturbano ed anzi concordo con te sull'idea di esplosione ... la resa dell'ottica invece è deludente ma questo si sapeva e non è colpa tua |
| sent on January 11, 2013 (5:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great photos!!
I dare spectacular!
But the lights of the town????
perhaps disturb you?? Great Great Ottima foto !!!! Oserei spettacolare !!! Ma le luci del paese ??????? forse disturbano ??? Grande Grande |
| sent on January 11, 2013 (5:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More than just an explosion looks like a real fire and also because that group of clouds that starts from up there looks like the smoke of a fire .... for the rest I do not know I personally like Più che un esplosione sembra un proprio e vero incendio anche perchè quel gruppetto di nubi che parte proprio da li sopra sembra il fumo di una fiamma .... per il resto non so a me personalmente piace |
| sent on January 11, 2013 (12:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful picture like all the rest ... I doubt, however, is: what was the need for the camera, with that goal, with 30 "shutter speed with a tripod" shoot "the ISO to 3200? Foto bellissima come tutte del resto... mi sorge un dubbio però: che bisogno c'era con quella fotocamera, con quell'obiettivo, con 30" di tempo di scatto, con il treppiede "sparare" gli ISO a 3200? |
user1856 | sent on January 11, 2013 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ a lens that costs as much as the 16-35 is inadmissible a result like this: distortion and vignetting at the highest level, the very megli ciofegon plasticotto 18-55 .... and costs 30 euro ... „
the ciofegon can not be used in these conditions (angle of view, aperture used, 2.8 etc) then the speech is irrelevant, right? ;-) " da un obiettivo che costa quanto il 16-35 è inammissibile un risultato come questo: deformazione e vignettatura ai massimi livelli, molto megli il ciofegon plasticotto 18-55....e costa 30 euro... " il ciofegon non si può usare in queste condizioni (angolo di campo, apertura utilizzata di 2.8 etc) quindi il discorso è irrilevante, no? |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |