What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 22, 2016 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Yari78 passage.
For clarity "lose" a little bit of time in the settings during shooting, pp usually does not take long step time (at least not for the sharpness).
Greetings, Ivan Grazie Yari78 del passaggio.
Per la nitidezza "perdo" un pochino di tempo nelle impostazioni in fase di scatto, in pp di solito non ci passo molto tempo (non per la nitidezza almeno).
Un saluto, Ivan |
| sent on February 22, 2016 (10:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ivan too sharp for not having worked a little PP .. especially with 17-40 ;-)
However the fact remains that the end result is spectacular! :-) Ivan troppo nitida per non averci lavorato un po in PP.. soprattutto col 17-40 
Comunque ciò non toglie che il risultato finale è spettacolare! |
| sent on February 22, 2016 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, a little bit it is obvious that the work regarding the sharpness, it is usually to clear selectors changes (which I like very much to the result that makes) and sharpness (which I edit very little because it has an effect that I like very little), but in all (for sharpness) step there only a few seconds pp :-)
From your comments I understand, but maybe I'm wrong, that you're just not happy with the 17-40.
I can tell you that my'm really happy and I think has a very good sharpness, I even came up to f / 16, but more so for now I dare not, certainly I would not change it for the 16-35, unless some good soul I do not regalasse :-D
Thanks again pass, hello hello ;-)
Ivan
Beh, un pó è ovvio che la lavoro per quanto riguarda la nitidezza, si tratta in genere di modifiche ai selettori di chiarezza (che mi piace veramente molto per il risultato che rende) e nitidezza (che modifico pochissimo perché ha un effetto che mi piace molto poco), ma in tutto (per la nitidezza) ci passo solo qualche secondo in pp
Dal tuo commento mi sembra di capire, ma forse mi sbaglio, che non sei proprio soddisfatto del 17-40.
Posso dirti che del mio sono veramente contento e reputo abbia una buonissima nitidezza, sono arrivato anche fino a f/16 ma di più per ora non oso, di certo non lo cambierei per il 16-35, a meno che qualche buona anima non me lo regalasse 
Grazie ancora del passaggio, ciao ciao
Ivan
|
| sent on February 22, 2016 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the clarification Ivan, I have to say that the 17-40 satisfies me but not on the edges, even diaphragmed between f8 and f11 (better yield then goes into diffraction). Anyway I love the wide-angle and I love their perspective deformation which in fact I correct little or nothing :-D but if one day I can, I will pass to the 16-35 IS that's on another level ;-)
Grazie per la delucidazione Ivan, devo dire che il 17-40 mi soddisfa ma non sui bordi, anche diaframmato tra f8 e f11 (miglior resa poi va in difrazione). Comunque amo i grandangolari e amo la loro deformazione prospettica che difatti correggo poco e niente ma se un giorno potrò, passerò al 16-35 IS che è su un altro livello
|
| sent on June 23, 2016 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great nice shot and good accomplishment! Complimenti.Ciao :-) Gran bello scatto e ottima realizzazione!Complimenti.Ciao |
| sent on June 23, 2016 (23:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Scaligero bridge, good night, good management of lights and great pdr, congratulations, 8-)
claudio c Il ponte Scaligero , ottimo notturno , buona gestione delle luci e ottimo pdr , complimenti , 
claudio c |
| sent on June 24, 2016 (14:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot and excellent post production.
Compliments.
AM Bello scatto e ottima Post Produzione.
Complimenti.
A.M. |
| sent on June 26, 2016 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Claudio and Antonio comments.
Greetings, Ivan ;-) Grazie Claudio ed Antonio dei commenti.
Un saluto, Ivan |
| sent on September 29, 2018 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations Ivan-you have a feeling for the long exposures and the incredible night. Great. :-P
at the cost of appearing trivial: all beautiful photos of your galleries...
Good we :-P
Mark Complimenti Ivan - hai una sensibilità per le lunghe esposizioni ed i notturni incredibile. Bravissimo. 
A costo di apparire banale: tutte bellissime le foto delle tue gallerie...
Buon we
marco |
| sent on December 06, 2018 (17:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A night's splendor!
Ale Uno splendore di notturno!
Ale |
| sent on April 15, 2023 (17:07) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
