Veil Nebula (eastern part) in the Swan [JuzaPhoto]

Join JuzaPhoto!

YOU ARE IN : Forum » Astrophotography » Veil Nebula (eastern part) in the Swan

SERIES: VARIE

Veil Nebula (eastern part) in the Swan sent on June 24, 2012 (9:00) by Nadir. 24 comments, 6202 views.

La Veil Nebula (nebulosa Velo) nella costellazione estiva del Cigno è un residuo dell'esplosione di una supernova. La parte ripresa nella foto è quella più a est, in realtà la nebulosa è un anello di gas esteso per circa 3°. La foto ha questo aspetto perchè sono due immagini distinte messe poi a registro in modo da registrare la nebulosa completamente. Ripresa attraverso un rifrattore apocromatico Takahashi FS102 da 10 cm. f/6 e CCD astronomico da 1,4 Mpx. Per ognuna delle due foto messe a registro sono 6 riprese da 10 minuti cadauna in Halfa, più 3 riprese da 5 minuti per ognuno dei canali RGB in binning 2x2.

37 persons like it: Juza, Fulcontact, Sarah, Caiman, Johnjz, Australianrider, Afrikachiara, Gustiweb, Gennaro, Tore Serra, Ruben Rodriguez Spinetto, Damiano, Mario Frattarelli, Gabbo_77, Orso364, Astro_kiara, Grievas, Luca-spleen, Harlock, Gtabbi, Enrico Parigi, Domenico82, Marco4x4, Max57, Casanovami, Enzo Crispino, Volo, Cobarcore, Eug60, Marcofarina, Festi Emilio, Eta Beta, Bortolix63, Tiziana57, Francis77, Andrea Casali, Jahromi

Some of the following comments may have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 25000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Juza

sent on June 24, 2012 (9:52)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Spectacular photos and description very interesting!

Johnjz

sent on June 24, 2012 (14:07)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Congratulations! Excellent job!

Nadir

sent on June 24, 2012 (17:19)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Thank you very much Juza and Johnjz :-)

Caiman

sent on June 25, 2012 (12:09)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Really Superb! ;-)

Enrico Parigi

sent on June 25, 2012 (12:36)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

super!! wow wow wow wow!

Dexter

sent on June 25, 2012 (12:46)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

excellent recovery of the Veil and double congratulations from me for the deserved recognition ;-)

Eug60

sent on June 25, 2012 (17:25)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Amazing ..........

Congratulations!!!! :-P:-P:-P:-P

Gennaro

sent on June 25, 2012 (18:36)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

ua .. to be amazed .. compimentissimi ..

Nadir

sent on June 25, 2012 (19:59)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Thank you all for the nice comments, the "Like" and many passages:-P

Gabbo_77

sent on June 25, 2012 (23:25)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

I also find it excellent ... The complexity in making and developing these pictures is very high, so you have all my respect!

Tore Serra

sent on June 25, 2012 (23:47)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Excellent work for a spectacular result, compliments and congratulations ;-)

Technophil

sent on June 26, 2012 (8:38)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

It 'increbile that exists, you can not see and it's really far away ...

Nadir

sent on June 26, 2012 (12:27)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Many thanks to Gabbo_77, Tore Serra and Tecnophil ;-)

Enzo Crispino

sent on June 26, 2012 (15:02)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

An amazing job!

Baldassarre

sent on June 27, 2012 (1:05)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Very unique and impressive. Thanks for the information supplied, which I find very interesting because they are poorly informed about this kind of photography is fascinating though :) and I'd like to better understand the technique.

Nadir

sent on June 27, 2012 (7:00)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Thanks to Enzo Crispino and Baldassarre :-)

Azzard

sent on June 28, 2012 (9:25)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Fantastica! Makes me think of the infinite universe, "our life is a thousandth of a second in a million years"

Nadir

sent on June 28, 2012 (12:07)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Thanks Azzard, a nice thought your ;-)

Wolf3d

sent on July 18, 2012 (0:04)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Hello Nadir, are interested in using CCD sensors in the field astrografico, knowing their affection for noise due to the lower temperature, the advantage of the absence of the Bayer filter, etc. ...
I wondered, however, if the "poor" resolution does not obstruct a bit 'these benefits.
As a result you would get using a CCD instead of a recent Nikon D800 (which judging by the test file returns very clean) or better with a cmos sensor photosite even bigger?
In short, I wanted to hear some of your consideration in this regard.
Thank you!

Nadir

sent on July 18, 2012 (7:38)

This comment has been automatically translated with Google Translate (show/hide original)

Thanks for the ride Wolf3d ;-)
In reality it is a false problem, because today eistono CCD large physical
which allow to frame fields much larger than that possessed I.
A clarification, however, the resolution was far from poor, because the size
pixel was one of the smallest existing then, and allowed high-resolution photos
with focal around the meter, was a small field of view.
The D800E seems a good camera for the photo astronomy, the advantage over
to a CCD that is not specific for astrophotography, then you can also use for
another, but in any case the advantage of CCD, despite the greater difficulty operating, remains
indeniable.
However, there are color CCD that, compared with a quality of the results a little worse,
reduce the complexity of the shoot.

Ads by Google

Ads by Google

Top of the page ^

PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »