|
Canon EOS
40D review

The Canon 40D is the real
successor of the popular 20D (I don't consider the 30D - it
was just a very minor update). The new Canon offers some major
improvement over the 20/30D, and in some aspects it is even
better than professional 1 series (more advanced Live View,
lighter and smaller body). Even though the image quality has
not much improved, it was already pretty good, and the new
cameras offers many new features, that make it my choice as
DSLR body.
Camera
Specifications
|
Camera
|
Canon EOS 40D
|
|
Image sensor
|
10.10 megapixel APS-C (1.6x
crop) CMOS sensor
|
| File
format |
RAW
(3,888x2592 pixels, approx 12 MB .Cr2 files), sRAW,
JPEG |
| Color
space |
Adobe
RGB, sRGB |
| White
balance |
Auto,
Daylight, Shade, Cloudy, Tungsten Light, White
Fluorescent Light, Flash,
Custom, user-set Color Temperature |
| Viewfinder |
95%
coverage, magnification 0.95x, -3.0 to +1.0 diopter
adjustment |
| Autofocus |
9
cross-type AF sensors; working range EV -0.5 –18;
One-Shot AF, AI Focus AF, AI Servo AF, Manual Focus
(MF) |
| Metering
modes |
35-zone
TTL full aperture metering. Evaluative, Partial,
Spot, Centerweighted |
| Metering
range |
EV
0–20 |
| Exposure
modes |
Program,
aperture priority, shutter priority, manual,
scene, C1, C2, C3 |
| ISO
sensitivities |
ISO
100–1600 (in 1/3 stop increments), ISO 100 - 3200
in expanded mode |
| Exposure
compensation |
+/-2
stops in 1/3 or 1/2 stop increments |
| Shutter
speeds |
30"
- 1/8000 plus Bulb pose |
| X-sync |
1/250 |
| Continuous
shooting speed |
6.5
FPS for 17 RAW or 75 JPEG |
| LCD
screen |
3.0",
230.000 pixels TFT screen |
| Playback |
Single
image, 4-image index, 9-image index, Jump, Magnified
zoom (approx. 1.5x to 10x), Histogram, Auto rotate,
Rotate, highlight alert |
| Support |
CF
Card Type I and II |
| Battery |
One
dedicated lithium-ion battery BP-511A (or BP-511,
BP-514, BP-512) |
| Weather
sealing |
No |
| Dimensions
(W) x (H) x (D) |
146
x 108 x 74mm (5.7 x 4.2 x 2.9 in.) |
| Weight |
740g
(1.6 lb) body only, 822g (1.8lb) with battery |
|
Price
|
$ 1,300 at B&H
|
|
Announced
|
2007
|
|
Other features
|
14 bit ADC, live view, silent
shooting, custom modes, anti-dust, shutter
durability 100,000 cicles
|
Image
quality
The first thing that you will
notice in the specs of 40D is the increased
resolution, from the 8 megapixels of the 20D to 10 megapixel.
There is not an huge difference between 8 and 10 megapixels,
but the resolution improvement is welcome - it allows to
capture a bit more detail, to make larger prints or larger
crops. By the way, the 40D has also a slightly smaller sensor
(22.2x14.8mm vs the 22.5x15mm of the 20D), that gives a little
higher field of fiew multiplier - 1.62x vs 1.60x of the 20D. I
have compared the 40D with the 20D using my sharpest lens, and
of course tripod and MLU (for 20D) or Live View Mode 1 (for
40D). The RAW photos had been converted with the same settings
in ACR.
 |
| The
entire test target, resized to 720 pixels. |
|
 |
| 100%
crop from the photo taken with the Canon 20D |
|
 |
| 100%
crop from the photo taken with the Canon 40D. The camera
clearly captures more fine detail. |
What about noise? You might be surprised to
discover that 40D is about 0.5-0.7 stops noisier
than the 20D - an
unexpected step back, but it is the price to pay for more
megapixels in the same sensor size. That said, I doubt that the Nikon D300,
the Sony A700 or the Olympus E-3 offer a better image quality;
the small APS-C sensor can not compete with larger sensors in
terms of noise, in particular with high resolution and small
pixel, as in these cameras.
 |
| The
100% crop from the 20D at 1600 ISO. The noise is
relatively low, considering that it is a three years old
camera! |
| |
 |
| The
crop the 40D (resized at 8mp), with the exposure
suggested my the camera. The noise is similar to 20D
noise - I'd say just a little more, in this crop the 40D
seem about 0.2 stop worse than 20D. But the shutter
speed is 1/2 stop longer! |
| |
 |
| Indeed,
the 40D sensor is about 0.5 stops less sensitive than 20D sensor - in other words, if you take a photo with
the same exposure, the image taken with the 40D will be
0.5 stops darker. Overall, I'd say that in terms of
ISO/noise performance the 40D is nearly 0.7 stop worse
than the 20D. |
Live View
and Silent Shooting
As
all new Canon cameras, the 40D has Live
View. You can use the big LCD screen to frame the photo;
you can judge in real-time the exposure (it is possible to
simulate the exposure and to view the histogram in real time!)
and the depth of
field, and you can even magnify up to 10x a portion of the
image for a more accurate focussing. Live View is mainly for
macro, landscapes and other still subjects, beucause the AF
functionality is limited - by default, AF is disabled when you
use live view; you can still AF with the AF-On button (when
you press AF-on, the camera quickly stops live view, it
focusses, and when you release the button it comes back to
live view). Another nice feature of live view is to show a
super-imposed grid, that helps to compose the photo and to
avoid tilted horizons.
I often use the Sigma 180 Macro
with 2.0 TC, that gives a very dark 360mm f/7.1. The AF of
course does not work, so you are forced to use MF: it is far
from easy and, unless you have a very good eye, you will get
many out of focus photos (with the 20D or other cameras
without live view). Live View is another world! You frame the
photo through a big, bright, sharp LCD screen,
then you zoom at 10x and you fine tune the focus on the
subject. You can even stop down the lens to the effective
aperture (with the DOF preview button) to check the depth of
fied, both on the entire image or in a 10x magnified area...it
is fantastic to see in real time the effect of different
apertures! And remember that while the viewfinder becomes
extremely dark if you press the DOF preview button, the LCD
always maintain the same brightness...I love it! Last but not least, with live
view you no longer need the Angle-Finder. In the past I used a lot
the Canon Angle-Finder C for macro photography, it is very
useful when you have to frame a subject from weird angles, but
I don't like it a lot: the built quality is average, it makes
more difficult to find the subject, it makes the viewfinder
even darker, and it has a crappy diopter adjustment system
(you have to change the diopter every time that you switch
from 1.25x to 2.5x). The live view is so much better! This is
really one of my preferred features of the 40D. The
Live View of the 40D has some big improvements in comparison
with the live view of the 1D3. The 40D offers a Live View
option called "Silent
Shooting", that offers many advantages. To
understand Silent Shooting, you have to know how the Live View
works in 1D3 and 40D; the next test describes the difference
between the two cameras, the practical results and how silent
shooting compares to MLU. All the images are highly magnified crops of
photos taken at 1/6 f/3.5 with the Sigma 180 Macro. Remember
that when the LV is active, the mirror is up, and the shutter
is open - this is true for both cameras.
 |
| All
cameras - no Live View, no MLU : when you
press the shutter release, the camera 1) raises the
mirror 2) opens the shutter for the time necessary for
the exposure 3) closes the shutter to terminate the
exposure. The steps 1 and 2 creates some vibrations,
that may result in blurred photos, with slow shutter
speeds. |
| |
 |
| All
cameras - no Live View, MLU active : when
you press the shutter release for the first time, the
camera 1) raises the mirror; when you press the shutter
release for the second time, the camera 2) opens the
shutter for the time necessary for the exposure 3)
closes the shutter to terminate the exposure. The step 1
creates some vibrations, but you can wait few second
before pressing again the shutter release, so the
vibrations are eliminated. The steps 2 and 3 may still
create minor vibractions, even though usually they are
negligible. |
| |
 |
| Canon
40D with Silent Shooting Disabled, or Canon 1D3
: when you press the shutter release, the camera 1)
closes the shutter 2) opens the shutter for the time
necessary for the exposure 3) closes the shutter to
terminate the exposure 4) opens again the shutter to
come back to Live View. The step 1 creates relatively
strong vibrations, and the steps 2 and 3 may still
create minor vibractions. With the 1D3 (or the 40D in
this mode), even though the mirror is raised, you can
still get motion blur. If you have the 1D3, I recommend
to exit from Live View just before the exposure and
shooting with MLU active, to get the maximum sharpness
with slow shutter speeds. |
|
 |
| Canon
40D with Silent Shooting Mode 1 : when
you press the shutter release, the camera 1) resets the
sensor and begins the exposure 2) closes the shutter to
terminate the exposure 3) opens again the shutter to
come back to Live View. The 40D has an electronic
shutter, other than the traditional mechanical shutter;
in SS Mode 1, the only step that may create minor
vibrations is 2 (the step 1, instead, does not create
any vibration because it is completelu electronic). In
practice, with this Mode and Live View active you no
longer need MLU - actually, it is even better! It given
an even better sharpness, and it does no require to
press two times the shutter release and wait, as the
traditional MLU. |
 |
| Canon
40D with Silent Shooting Mode 2 : when
you press the shutter release, the camera 1) resets the
sensor and begins the exposure 2) closes the shutter to
terminate the exposure; when you release the shutter
release, the camera 3) opens again the shutter to come
back to Live View. In terms of sharpness, this mode is
as effective as mode 1; the practical differences are
that if you keep pressed the shutter release after the
exposure, the step 3 is delayed, so the shutter noise is
even more reduced (this is useful if you are
photographing a very shy subject and you don't want to
scare it with the sound of the shutter release). In SS
Mode 2, it is not possible to use continuos shooting. |
If these technical explainations
sound too complex for you, just remember that with the 40D
(but not the 1D3) you no longer need MLU when you are using
Live View :-)
Another advantage of the 40D, in
comparison to the 20D and the other cameras, if the very quiet
shutter release sound, in particular when you shoot with Live
View and SS Mode 1 or 2. The next graphs represents the
waveform of the shutter sound of a six photos burst (the
lower, the better); I've compared the 40D with my previous
camera. You can even download the .wav file to hear the
difference!
Tethered
shooting, Wireless shooting and Video Capabilities
With
the USB cable supplied with the camera, you can connect
the 40D to your computer, and with the Canon EOS
Utility 2.0 software you can change every setting of
the camera and download instantly the photos on
computer. With the 40D (and other cameras that offer
live view), now you can even see in real time the
scene recorded by the sensor on your PC screen, you
can magnify the photo and focus through the EOS
Utility software. With the wireless transmitter Canon
WFT-E3A (that doubles up as vertical grip), you can do
the same things without any cable between you and the
camera (it has a range of up to 45 meters)!
This is an amazing technology, that offers many new
photo - and video - opportunities. Even though the 40D
does not offer real video capabilities, with a screen
recording software you can capture the live view video
showed by the camera. The video quality is good, even
though it is not spectacular (but remeber that I have
no experience in video editing, the image quality of
this sample video could be much better). Now
it is nothing more than a curiosity, but I think that
photo and video cameras are coming closer and closer
to a merging - maybe the next generation of cameras
will offer real video capabilities? |
 |
| A
short video captured with 40D, Canon Utility 2.0 and
screen recording software. You need the latest version
of DivX codec. [click
here to download] |
|
| A SLR with real
video capabilities would offer big advantages in
comparison with amateur and middle-range camcorders -
first and most important, the possibility to use
high-quality inter changeable SLR lenses! Usually
camcorders lack of real wide angles, and professional
wide-angle may cost thoushands of $ - with a SLR and a
$400 lens as the 10-20mm, you could get the same
angles of view at a much lower price. Other than that,
SLRs should be able to offer much better image quality
than amateur camcorders, thanks to the large sensor. |
Other
Improvements (in comparison with
20/30D and other DSLRs)
* The
body is quite small and light (nearly on par
with the 20D); it is much lighter and smaller than 1 series
cameras. I really like the cameras without built-in vertical
grip as the 40D, it is much easier to carry around, and the
ergonomics are excellent.
* Larger
viewfinder: while
the photo coverage is the same of the 20D, the viewfinder is
clearly larger (and in my opinion it is also a little
brighter). It is not as large as the 1Ds3 or 5D viewfinder,
but it is very close to the 1D3 viewfinder. Another nice
improvement is that it shows the ISO setting.
* The remote release/flash/USB/video
rubber door is really improved in comparison
with the 20D - with the 20, it was pretty awkward to open, and
even more difficult to close. Now, it is a breeze to open it
when I need to connet some cable, and it is easy to close.
* Support
for 16 GB and larger
Compact Flash cards. As you may already know, I don't like to
have many CF cards - I believe that having many CFs increases
the risk to lose one of them. I prefer to have few
high-capacity CFs: the flash memories are very reliable, and
it is extremely rare that a CF fails, so I don't worry about
putting all my photos on a single CF. I'm going to buy a
Sandisk 16GB Extreme III, and I'll upgrade to 25-40 GB CFs
when they are available.
* Improved
Compact Flash write speed:
currently (september 2007) the 40D has the fastest write times
of every Canon Camera (it is even faster than the professional
1D Mark III).
| |
Canon
1D Mark III |
Canon
40D |
Canon
20D |
Canon
350D |
|
Sandisk "standard"
256MB
|
2.77
MB/second |
2.60
MB/second |
2.37
MB/second |
2.81
MB/second |
|
Sandisk Ultra II 4GB
|
4.76
MB/second |
7.53
MB/second |
3.45
MB/second |
4.05
MB/second |
|
Sandisk Extreme III 4GB
|
9.55
MB/second |
11.35
MB/second |
5.42
MB/second |
7.30
MB/second |
|
Sandisk Extreme IV 4GB
|
9.55
MB/second |
11.84
MB/second |
5.42
MB/second |
7.30
MB/second |
* The
new autofocus module now features nine
cross-type AF sensors (up to f/5.6), and the center point acts
as high-precision point up to f/2.8. I have not done any
scientific test, but the AF feels a little faster than 20D AF.
I'd have preferred an AF system that worked up to f/8, but I
did not expect it, considering the price range of this camera.
*
Another feature common to all new Canon, since
the 400D, is the anti-dust
- a system that shakes off dust from the
sensor.I've never considered the dust a serios problems - even
with my old 20D that has not anti-dust, I've never had
particular problems, and I've had to clean the sensor just few
times. Anyway, the new anti-dust is a welcome feature :-)
* Continuos
shooting at 6.5 FPS x 17 RAW.
While the difference between the 5FPS of the 20D and the 6.5
FPS of the 40D is not huge, it is a nice improvement. The
buffer instead is a big improvement - the 20D had just a 6
RAWs buffer, that sometimes was too short, while the 17 RAW
are more than enough. By the way, the shutter release sound is
much less loud than 20D's strong "tlack!".
* Intuitive,
easy to use menu system.
The 40D has the same excellent menu system of the new 1 series
(even though of course it has not some of the most advanced
option of the 1D3 and 1Ds3). The navigation is easy, fast and
intuitive, thanks to the clear icons and the excellent
interface - you can navigate between the option using
the joystick and the main control dial, and you change
the settings with the "Set" button. The custom functions are
now ordered into four categories; there are 24
functions to customize every aspect of
the camera. Another feature that I love is the new
"My Menu" (the last menu page, marked by the
green star icon). In this page, you can record every
setting that you want, to have fast accesses to the
setting that you use most often.
* Very
large, big, bright LCD screen!
The 3.0" LCD of the 40D is the same of the 1 series, and
it is truly awesome. In comparison wih the small 1.8"
screen of the 20D, it looks huge! Moreover, it is easily
visible even in bright light, and it has a very wide viewing
angle. Truly awesome :-D
* The
three custom user modes
C1, C2 and C3. In every C mode, you can create
a "version" of the camera for a particular purpose. For example, an
advantage of C modes is that there is no longer need to find the MLU between the
menus - you just have to register it into the C mode that you
want to use as macro or landscape mode, then you will be able
to activate it immediately by selecting that C mode. (note,
regarding MLU: remember that if you use Live View you no
longer need MLU; you may need MLU only if you don't use Live
View)
* Very
good JPEG quality and noise
reduction. Honestly I don't care much about
JPEG since I always shoot RAW, but it is worth to mention that
the JPEG quality is very good, and it can be fine-tuned in
every aspect. Moreover, the camera offers a very effective
high ISO noise reduction (that can be activated through a
custom function), that really improved the image quality even
at high ISO. The following 100% crops compare the RAW and JPEG
image quality at 3200 ISO.
 |
|
 |
| RAW,
no noise reduction |
|
RAW,
noise reduction with Photoshop CS3 |
 |
|
 |
| JPEG,
no noise reduction |
|
JPEG,
in-camera noise reduction |
* Some
things that were already excellent in the 20D had not changed:
as it predecessor, the 40D has a range
of shutter speeds between 30" and 1/8000, and an X-sync
of 1/250 (and hi-speed flash on all shutter speeds with EX flashes, as the recent 580EX II,
that has shorter recicling time than the 580 and it
is weather sealed). The
user interface is similar to the excellent UI of the 20D, even
though the position of some buttons had changed, and of course
the screen is much bigger. Last but not least, I'm
glad that the 40D, unlike the 5D and 1 series, has a small
built-in flash; it is not very powerful, but sometimes it is
truly useful.
What I miss
and what I don't like...
* A real weather
sealing: the 40D has just some quite useless
seals on the battery and CF door; I'd really like to see a
true weather sealing on par with the Nikon D300 and Olympus
E-3.
* A wider exposure
compensation range: +/- 2 stops is a pretty
narrow range; I'd prefer +/- 5 stops (even the cheapest Nikon
cameras offer a +/- 5 stops compensation range).
* An advanced
battery, as the one used in Nikon D300 and D3
cameras and Canon 1 series, that show the remaining charge in
percentage, and indicates when the battery has reached the
maximum number or rechargin cycles and it is time to replace
it.
* On-demand
grid lines into viewfider! Nikon puts this
feature in nearly all its cameras, while with the 40D you have
to buy an optional focusing screen with grid lines. The
difference is not just price - with Nikon cameras you can turn
on or off the grid lines when you want, while with the Canon
cameras you have to change the focusing screen.
* Compact
flash UDMA Support:
even though the write speed of the 40D is already pretty good,
the new Nikon and Sony cameras are about three times faster,
thanks to UDMA support.
Image
samples
The following samples show the image quality of the Canon
40D at the lowest and the hightest ISO settings. The photos had been taken in RAW format and
converted with Photoshop CS3; I processed them to optimize the
image quality (contrast, color, sharpness), and I saved them
as high-quality JPEG for web display. You can download
both the processed JPEG and the original, untouched RAW file.
Click on every image to download
the full size JPEG sample, or use the RAW link to
download the untouched RAW (large files!). Please respect the
copyright! These images can be printed only to evaluate the
quality of the camera, for personal purposes. All other usages
are prohibited.
 |
 |
| Still
Life - 180 Macro, ISO 100, 1/6 f/9 [ JPEG
/ RAW
] |
Julia
The Cat - 24-105 IS, ISO 1600, 1/125 f/8 [
JPEG
/ RAW
] |
A
Comparison: why I prefer the 40D to 1D2n
Many times I'm asked why I bought
a 40D instead of a professional 1 series, as an used 1D2n.
Personally, I think that overall the 40D is a much better
camera; here I compared the main features, and I highlighted
in green the advantages of each camera.
|
|
Canon EOS 40D
|
Canon EOS
1D Mark IIn
|
|
|
|
Resolution
|
10.10 megapixels
|
8.3 megapixels
|
|
The 40D has a little more
resolution than 1D2n; it is not a big difference,
but it helps to make slightly larger prints and
crops.
|
|
Crop Factor
|
1.6x crop (APS-C CMOS sensor)
|
1.3x crop (APS-H CMOS sensor)
|
|
I hate the 1.3x crop
factor. It does not give as much advantages with
telephotos as the 1.6x factor, and it does not allow
to fullfill the potential of wide angles as
fullframe. Even the 1.6x is better with wide angles
- you can use the EF-S 10-22 to get the equivalent
of 16mm, while 1.3x are not compatible with APS-C
lenses and you are forced to use only FF lenses,
that loses their wide-angle capability due to 1.3x
crop.
|
| File
format |
RAW, sRAW,
JPEG |
RAW, JPEG |
|
On par. The 40D has the
useless sRAW format that is not available in the
1D2n, but I don't consider it an advantage.
|
| Color
space |
Adobe
RGB, sRGB |
Adobe
RGB, sRGB |
|
On par.
|
| Bit
depth |
14
bit |
12
bit |
|
On par. I don't
consider the 14 bit an advantage; in practice, I
have not seen any difference between 12 and 14 bit
images.
|
| Viewfinder |
95%
coverage, magnification 0.95x |
100%
coverage, magnification 0.72x |
|
The 40D viewfinder is
one of the best that I've seen on APS-C cameras, it
is very close to 1D2n viewfinder.
|
| Autofocus |
9
points (all
cross-type) |
45
points (7
cross-type) |
|
Which is better? For
sure the 1D2n AF has better tracking capabilities,
and it may be a little faster, but personally I have
not seen that big difference (but I must say that I
have not much experience with the 1D2n body). Other
than that, the 1D2n AF works up to f/8, while the
40D only to f/5.6. You may think that the 1D2 is a
better choice if you need very long focal lengths,
using superteles with TCs, but actually the 40D has
an huge advantage here. Let's see why.
If you have, for example, the 500
f/4, and you want to get more focal length while
maintaining AF, with the 40D you can get a 700 f/5.6
(500 f/4 + 1.4x), while with the 1D2n you can
get a 1000mm f/8 (500 f/4 + 2.0x). If you consider
the different crop factors and pixel densities:
Canon 1D2n, 8 megapixels, 1.3x crop --->
1000 x 1.3 = effective 1300mm f/8
Canon 40D, 1.6x crop, 1.8x if you
crop the 10mp file to 8 megapixels ---> 700 x 1.8
= effective 1260mm f/5.6
In conclusion, both cameras
allows to get the same effective focal length while
maintaining AF, with the difference that with the
40D you just need the 1.4x TC, so you get a 1 stop
brighter lens and more sharpness (the 1.4x reduces
the sharpness much less than 2.0x). Moreover, with
the 40D at 5.6 you still have all 9 cross type AF
sensors, while with the 1D2n at f/8 you have only 1
linear type AF sensor.
|
| AF
working range |
EV -0.5
to EV 18 |
EV
0 to EV 18 |
|
In very low light, the
40D AF is a little better, due to the larger AF
sensors.
|
| AF
point selection |
joystick
or main dial |
AF
selection button plus main and front dials |
|
The AF point selection
of the 40D is way better! With the 1D2n you
had to press a button and to use two dials, one to
move in horizontal and one for vertical, to select
the AF point. With the 40D you just have to move the
joystick or to rotate the main dial.
|
| Metering
modes |
35-zone
metering. Evaluative, Partial,
Spot, Centerweighted; Metering
range 0-20 EV |
21-zone
metering. Evaluative, Partial,
Spot, Centerweighted; Metering
range 0-20 EV |
|
In practice they are on
par.
|
| Exposure
modes |
P,
aperture, shutter, manual,
scene, C modes |
P,
aperture, shutter, manual |
|
The 40D has the three C
modes, that are very useful to customize the camera.
|
| ISO
sensitivities |
ISO
100–1600, 100 - 3200
in expanded mode |
ISO
100–1600, 50 - 3200
in expanded mode |
|
On par. The 1D2n has
ISO 50, but it is just a software trick - you can
get the same result shooting at ISO 100 with the 40D
and overexposing by 1 stop.
|
| Compensation |
+/-2
stops in 1/3 or 1/2 stop increments |
+/-3
stops in 1/3 or 1/2 stop increments |
|
Here the 1D2n has an
advantage, even though both of them are worse than
the cheapest Nikon camera - all Nikons offers a +/-
5 stops compensation range!
|
| Shutter
speeds |
30"
- 1/8000 plus Bulb pose, X-sync 1/250 |
30"
- 1/8000 plus Bulb pose, X-sync 1/250 |
|
On par.
|
| Shutter
durability |
100,000 cicles |
200,000 cicles |
|
The 1D2n has twice the
shutter durability - this is a big diffence, but you
have to consider that for the price of an used 1D2n
you can buy two 40D!
|
| FPS
and buffer |
6.5
FPS for 17 RAW or 75 JPEG |
8.3
FPS for 22 RAW or 44 JPEG |
|
Here the 1D2n clearly
wins.
|
| LCD
screen |
3.0",
230.000 pixels |
2.5",
230.000 pixels |
|
There is a noticeable
difference between 2.5" and 3", and the
40D screen makes easier to review the images.
|
| Playback
and menus |
New
menu system; Single
image, 4-image index, 9-image index, Jump, Magnified
zoom (approx. 1.5x to 10x), Histogram, ect. |
Old
1 series menu system; Single
image, 4-image index, 9-image index, Jump, Magnified
zoom (approx. 1.5x to 10x), Histogram, ect. |
|
Both cameras have the
same reviewing features, but the 40D has a much
better menu system (that now is the standard on all
new Canon SLRs), much more intuitive, quicker and
easier to use.
|
| Live
View |
yes |
no |
|
The live view is one of
my preferred features of the 40D, in my opinion an
huge advantage in comparison with the 1D2n.
|
| Anti
dust |
yes |
no |
|
A small advantage for
the 40D.
|
| Support |
CF
Card Type I and II |
CF
Card Type I and II, SD |
|
CF or SD, it does not
make a big difference, here I consider the two
cameras on par.
|
| Battery |
One
dedicated lithium-ion battery BP-511A |
One
dedicated Ni-MH battery pack NP-E3 |
|
The 40D battery is much
smaller, lighter and cheaper than 1D2n battery;
moreover, it is Li-Ion instead of Ni-Mh so it has
much less memory effect.
|
| Weather
sealing |
No |
Yes |
|
This is one of the
biggest disadvantages of the 40D, I really miss
weather sealing.
|
| Dimensions |
146
x 108 x 74mm (5.7 x 4.2 x 2.9 in.) |
156
x 158 x 80mm (6.1 x 6.2 x 3.1 in.) |
| Weight |
822
g (with battery) |
1535
g (with battery) |
|
I really like the
smaller size and lighter weight of the 40D!
|
|
Price
|
$ 1,300
|
about $ 2,500 - 3,000
|
|
Of couse cheaper is
better for my pockets :-) With half the price of an
used 1D2n you can buy a new 40D.
|
Conclusion
The Canon 40D has many
improvements and new technologies that makes it one of the
very best cameras ever produced by Canon. The image quality is
as good as it gets in this price range - not a big jump in
comparison with the 20/30D (more resolution but slightly worse
noise), and it can not compete with super pro SLRs and the 1
series or the Nikon D3 - but still very good, it is fully
usable in the entire 100-1600 ISO range, and even 3200 is
usable after a little of noise reduction. Live View, Silent
Shooting, fast AF, and increased shooting speed makes the 40D
a much more powerful and flexible tool than its predecessor;
the only thing that I really miss in this camera is a real
weather sealing; other than that, for my esigencies it is
perfect! I highly recommend the
Canon 40D to every nature photographer, unless
you have a very high budget to afford both a 1 series and
professional lenses.
Do you have
comments or questions?
If you have comments or questions about this
article, feel free to ask in the Juza
Nature Photography Discussion Forum!
|