HOME PAGE PORTFOLIO GALLERIES ARTICLES BIOGRAPHY CONTACT LINKS FORUM
 

    www.juzaphoto.com > Articles > Camera and Lens Reviews > Canon Cameras Lineup

Canon Cameras Lineup

Many times I am asked: "Wich camera do you recommend?" The answer depends entirely by your budget and by the features that you need. In this page I give an overview of the current Canon lineup; of course, before choosing your new reflex I recommend to read also in-depth reviews and the full specifications list, available on the manufacturer's website or on other websites as Dpreview. Here I analyzed the Canon lineup because it is the system that I use and the one I know better, but if you are choosing your first reflex, I recommend to give a look also to other similar bodies (the Nikon system is as good as Canon, but there are some differences in the cameras and lenses lineup, so choose carefully the one that fullfills your needs).

 

Canon cameras currenly in production 

Canon EOS 1000D - Amateur (10.1 mp, APS-C, ISO 100-1600, 1.5FPS x 5RAW, US$ 490, 2008)

The Canon EOS 1000D offers very good image quality at low price (it has the same 10 megapixel sensor used also in the Canon 400D and Canon 40D), but it is pretty poor in terms of features. It is slow (only 1.5 FPS makes it the slowest DSLR cameras on the market), it has the old 7 points AF of the 350D. On the US market, it is available only in kit with the 18-55 IS lens: what about if you already have this lens? Maybe Canon wants people to collect 18-55s? Usually I recommend to invest in lenses rather than in camera body, but in this case I recommend to avoid this camera; an used 450D or 40D are not much more expensive and they offer much better features. I expect to see a successor (1500D? 2000D?) later this year, hopefully with better specs: at least 2.5 FPS as the other brands equivalents, newer AF system and video mode.

Similar bodies: Nikon D60, Sony A200

  
Canon EOS 500D - Amateur (15.1 mp, APS-C, ISO 100-12800, 3.4FPS x 9RAW, US$ 800, 2009)

The 500D is a step up from the 450D. It has a sensor similar to the 50D sensor, that offers very good resolution and good image quality up to 800 ISO (1600 is usable, 3200 is barely ok, the higher setting are way too noisy for anything except snapshots). The 3.4 FPS x 9 RAW continuos shooting is good for an entry level camera, and it has a nice 3" LCD screen with 640x480px resolution, the same of the 50D and 5D2. Another big update is video: after the 5D2, the 500D is the second Canon SLR that offers HD video (1920x1080p at 20FPS or 1280x720p at 30FPS). In my opinion video in SLR is a great news, and the fact that after the 5D2 Canon has added video also in the 500D means that all future Canon cameras will offer video. I said that the 450D was "a good camera, but it cold have been better"; the 500D fixes the 450D downsides and it adds nice features as video...a very good step forward.

Similar bodies: Nikon D90, Sony A350, Olympus E-620

  
Canon EOS 50D - Semi-pro (15.1 mp, APS-C, ISO 100-12800, 6.3FPS x 16RAW, US$ 1200, 2008)

The 40D was one of my favorite Canon cameras, and the new 50D has been improved in various aspects: it has a 15 megapixel sensor with just a little more noise than 40D, 3" high resolution LCD, autofocus micro-adjustment, live view with autofocus, and support for UDMA CF card. I think that overall it is a nice camera, but you need high quality lenses to get the best from the very high resolution sensor. My main complaint is the lack of video: if you are interested in this feature, I'd recommend to wait until 2010 for the 60D (after the 500D announcemend, it is sure that all new Canon cameras will include video). I recommend it in particular to bird and wildlife photographers; the 15mp APS-C sensor, coupled with high quality tele lenses, gives a lot of reach thanks to the 1.6x multiplier (or 1.4x if you compare it with the 1DsIII cropped to 15 mp) and to the great cropping possibilities.

Similar bodies: Nikon D300, Sony A700, Olympus E-3

  

Canon EOS 5D Mark II - Pro (21.0 mp, FF, ISO 50-25600, 4 FPS x 14RAW, US$ 2700, 2008)

The new Canon 5DII is a big improvement in comparison with its predecessor: it has the same resolution of the 1Ds3 and the same noise performance, it has live view and it is the first Canon reflex that offers video mode. It is not super fast (4 FPS), so if you take mainly action photos the 50D or the 1D3 may be a better choice for you, while if your interest are macro and lanscape, the 5D2 is a perfect choice. In various aspects, it is even better than the 1DsIII - it is cheaper, smaller, lighter, and it offers the video mode! Video quality is very good, even at very high ISO, and it offers both high resolution (full HD, 1920x1080p) and 35mm depth of field. Other than that, you can use all your EF lenses (even wide agles, fisheye, macro, supertele) for video! Considering the price - one third of the 1Ds3 - I highly recommend the Canon 5D MarkII.

Similar bodies: Nikon D700, Sony A900

 
Canon EOS 1D Mark III - Pro (10.1 mp, APS-H, ISO 50-6400, 10FPS x 30RAW, US$ 3850, 2007)

The 1D3 is a sport and wildlife photographers dream. In the past (from its announcement and october 2007) is has suffered from serious AF problems, but now it seems that canon has finally sorted out the AF problems. The Canon 1D3 has very low noise (it is almost on par with the exceptional Nikon D3) and it is the only camera currently avaible that has 10FPS at 10 megapixel resolution and with AF traking. I recommend this camera to nature photographers that have an high budget and are specialized in wildlife and action. Personally, I have preferred the 1DsIII because it is a more "all around" camera; I don't like the 1.3x crop factor of the 1D3, and I prefer higher resolution cameras that give more cropping possibilities. It is a relatively old camera, but I don't expect to see a replacement this year; the 1D Mark IV is likely to be announced next year.

Similar bodies: Nikon D3

  
Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III - Pro (21.0 mp, FF, ISO 50-3200, 5FPS x 12RAW, US$ 7000, 2007)

In the field of nature photography, the 1Ds3 may interest mainly landscape photographers, even though the improvements in comparison with the previous versions make it much more usable as all-around camera; its speed does not come even close to the 1D3, but it is already pretty good. The features are essentially identical to the 1D3, except the burst (5 FPS instead or 10PFS) and the sensor: the fullframe, 21 megapixel sensor a dream for those who want the maximum detail and for those who often use wide-angle lenses. That said, it is greatly overpriced (as the Nikon D3x), and there are cheaper cameras that offer the same resolution (5DII, A900), and more features (the 5DII has a fantastic video mode, so you can use it both for photos and videos). Nowadays, I don't recommend the 1DsIII - if I had to choose now, I'd go for the 5D Mark II.

Similar bodies: Nikon D3x

 

Canon cameras history

This table lists all Canon digital SLRs. The SLRs currenly in production are highlightened in yellow. MP = megapixel; FPS = frames per second; LCD = size and resolution of the LCD screen; WS = weather sealing; Price = current price (or street price when the camera was in production).

Camera MP Sensor ISO Range FPS LCD  WS Weight Price
2000
 Canon D30  3.1  APS-C  100-1600  3FPS x 3RAW  1.8", 240x160  No  855g $ 3,000
2001
 Canon 1D  4.1  APS-H  100-3200  8FPS x 16RAW  2.0", 240x160  Yes  1585g $ 5,500
2002
 Canon D60  6.3  APS-C  100-1600  3FPS x 8RAW  1.8", 240x160  No  855g $ 2,000
 Canon 1Ds  11.1  FF  50-3200  3FPS x 10RAW  2.0", 240x160  Yes  1600g $ 8,000
2003
 Canon 10D  6.3  APS-C  100-3200  3FPS x 9RAW  1.8", 240x160  No  890g $ 1,600
 Canon 300D  6.3  APS-C  100-1600  2.5FPS x 4RAW  1.8", 240x160  No  650g $ 900
2004
 Canon 1D Mark II  8.2  APS-H  50-3200  8FPS x 20RAW  2.0", 320x240  Yes  1565g $ 4,500
 Canon 1Ds Mark II  16.7  FF  50-3200  4FPS x 11RAW  2.0", 320x240  Yes  1565g $ 8,000
 Canon 20D  8.2  APS-C  100-3200  5FPS x 6RAW  1.8", 240x160  No  770g $ 1,400
2005
 Canon 20Da  8.2  APS-C  100-3200  5FPS x 6RAW  1.8", 240x160  No  770g $ 2,200
 Canon 350D  8.0  APS-C  100-1600  3FPS x 4RAW  1.8", 240x160  No  540g $ 700
 Canon 1D Mark IIn  8.2  APS-H  50-3200  8FPS x 22RAW  2.5", 320x240  Yes  1565g $ 4,000
 Canon 5D  12.8  FF  50-3200  3FPS x 17RAW  2.5", 320x240  No  895g $ 2,000
2006
 Canon 30D  8.2  APS-C  100-3200  5FPS x 11RAW  2.5", 320x240  No  785g $ 1,000
 Canon 400D  10.1  APS-C  100-1600  3FPS x 10RAW  2.5", 320x240  No  555g $ 520
2007
 Canon 1D Mark III  10.1  APS-H  50-6400  10FPS x 30RAW  3.0", 320x240  Yes  1335g $ 3,850
 Canon 1Ds Mark III  21.0  FF  50-3200  5FPS x 12RAW  3.0", 320x240  Yes  1335g $ 7,000
 Canon 40D  10.1  APS-C  100-3200  6.5FPS x 17RAW  3.0", 320x240  No  840g $ 840
2008
 Canon 450D  12.2  APS-C  100-1600  3.5FPS x 6RAW  3.0", 320x240  No  525g $ 580
 Canon 1000D  10.1  APS-C  100-1600  1.5FPS x 6RAW  2.5", 320x240  No  500g $ 490
 Canon 50D  15.1  APS-C  100-12800  6.3FPS x 16RAW  3.0", 640x480  No  820g $ 1200
 Canon 5D Mark II  21.0  FF  50-25600  4 FPS x 14RAW  3.0", 640x480  Yes  900g $ 2700
2009
 Canon 500D  15.1  APS-C  100-12800  3.4FPS x 9RAW  3.0", 640x480  No  530g $ ??

 

The best value for money

What is a good all around lineup for serious nature photography? I have received this question many times; even though there is not an universal answer for everyone (it depends by your esigencies), this is the lineup that I'd recommend if you want to get the best value for your money:

Camera body: Canon EOS 50D ($ 1200). I was a big fan of the 40D; I think it still has a better price/performances ratio than the 50D, but the 50D higher resolution sensor gives some advantage, if you have high quality lenses. It is fast, it is not too heavy, and it has a wide range of useful features (live view, custom shooting modes, and a lot more). My only real complaint is the lack of video mode; if you are interested in this feature I'd suggest to wait until 2010 for the 60D.

Wide angle: Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC ($ 500). In my opinion it is the best wide angle for APS-C format; it is cheaper than the Canon 10-22 but it has the same image quality, and it is a lot wider than 12-24mm lenses.

Standard zoom: Canon 24-105 f/4 L IS USM ($ 1,050). A great all around lens. On APS-C, the image quality is almost perfect (vignetting and distortion are not visible); it is versatile and it has a very good range of focal lenghts.

Macro: Sigma 180 Macro f/3.5 EX DG ($ 800). My favorite macro lens - it is sharp, it has a good working distance, it gives a pleasing background blur and it is much cheaper than the Canon equivalent (the image quality is the same).

Tele lens: Canon 300 f/2.8 L IS USM ($ 4,000) with Canon 2x TC ($ 290) and Canon 1.4x TC ($ 290). I love this lens! It offers good reach with the teleconverters, and it is much lighter, smaller and cheaper than the other L superteles. It is easy to carry around and it is easy to handhold.

Memory card: Transcend 32 GB ($ 95). It offers a lot of storage space (about 1600 photos on 50D) at a very good price. It is not the fastest card on the market, but it is fast enough for most applications.

 

Do you have comments or questions?

If you have comments or questions about this article, feel free to ask in the Juza Nature Photography Discussion Forum!