HOME PAGE PORTFOLIO GALLERIES ARTICLES BIOGRAPHY CONTACT LINKS FORUM
 

    www.juzaphoto.com > Articles > Nature and Travel > Walking On The Moon

Walking On The Moon

The Moon is by far the most photographed extra-planetary subject, nevertheless, it is always a fascinating view. With a photographic setup - long lens, tripod and DSLR camera - it is impossible to equal the result of high quality telescopes with equatorial mount and dedicate astrophotography cameras. Moreover, even the most advanced "terrestrial" setup will never give the results of the Hubble Space Telescope - so, why bother taking photos of the Moon?

I don't have any rational answer to this question ;-). The Moon has a "magic" attraction for me and many other photographers...

 

The Moon: Some Info About Our Satellite

The Moon, Earth's only natural satellite, is nearly one-fourth the size of our planet, with a diameter of 3476 kilometers. The distance between the Earth and the Moon is nearly 384,400 kilometers - to make a comparison, this is nearly 100 times the distance between New York and Paris. After the Sun, the Moon is the brightest object in the sky, even though it has an albedo of just 0.07, i.e., it reflects just the 7% of the sunlight.

The Moon has been object of myths, legend and observations ever since the prehistoric age. The Greek philosopher Anaxagoras formulated the first scientific explanation: he thought that both the Sun and the Moon were giant rocks, and the Moon reflected the light of the Sun. Until Middle Ages, though, the Moon was considered a nearly perfect sphere - Galileo, in 1609, was the first to clearly recognize the craters on the Moon's surface. In the following centuries, the progresses of optical technology made possible more detailed observations of the Moon, and many craters were labeled with the names that they still have today. On the Moon surface there is no water at liquid state - nevertheless, the darker areas were called "Mare" (sea), while the brighter ones are called "Terrae" or continents.

The Moon is in synchronous rotation with the Earth; in other words, it shows always the same fate to the Earth. The dark side of the Moon actually is not dark at all - it receives exactly the same illumination of the other side but, since it is never seen by the Earth, it remained "dark", i.e. unknown, to us until 1960, when it was extensively mapped by the Lunar Orbiter program.

The July 21, 1969, at 02:56 UTC Neil Armstrong (commander of Apollo 11), moved the first steps on a extra- planetary body. The Moon was explored by other Apollo mission in the next years; in December 1972, Eugene Cernan was the last man to visit the Moon.

The photo on the right shows the surface of the Moon, photographed by NASA in the Apollo 17 mission. Not exactly a pretty place - the Moon is an endless desert of grey rocks, characterized by thousands of craters - with a terrestrial telescope, it is possible to observe 30,000 craters, and there are many smaller craters that can not be seen from the Earth. There is no atmosphere and the gravity is one-sixth of the Earth's gravity.

Astronaut Harrison Schmitt on the Moon. Photo by NASA - click here for larger version.

If you want to know more about the Moon, I'd recommend to read the Wiki page about the Moon.

 

Canon 600 f/4 IS with both TCs, on Gitzo 1548 with Wimberley Head II - click here for larger version.

The Setup : Working at 1680mm

It is not enough to have a very long lens to take a good photo of the Moon: you have to solve many issues. Of course, the focal length is important, but you have to be careful with teleconverters: they increase the focal length, but they soften the image and they reduce the brightness of the lens. The 600 f/4 is easily useable with the 1.4x TC, it becomes more difficult with the 2.0x and it is extremely difficult to use with stacked TCs. 

In the Canon 600 f/4 IS review there is a studio test that demonstrates how stacked TCs have the potential to deliver some more detail than the bare 2.0x, but in practice the loss of image quality due to motion blur is often higher than the gain in magnification (remember that with stacked TCs you have to use an aperture of f/16 to get an acceptable image quality). To benefit from stacked teleconverters, you have to mount the lens on a rock solid support: for my photos, I used the Gitzo 1548 CF tripod with Wimberley WH-200 head. Of course, the image stabilization is active (Mode 1), and I use mirror lock up and self timer (or remote release). Placing a secondary support under the camera helps to eliminate the vibrations.

The shutter speed and ISO are another fundamental variable. With fast shutter speeds it is easier to avoid motion blur; on the other hand, if you raise too much the ISO sensitivity you get noisier images, that can not be sharpened as much as low-ISO photos. For my Moon shots, I used an ISO sensitivities of 200 and 400 to get a shutter speeds of at least 1/40. This SS is enough to avoid the blur caused the terrestrial rotation, but it is still very easy to get blur due to camera vibrations: you have to take many photos to be sure to get at least one sharp image.

The RAW files had been converted with Adobe Camera RAW and post-processed with Photoshop CS2; I used the Smart Sharpen to extract the maximum amount of detail.

 

Juza's Photos Gallery

Click on the thumbnail to see the photo. These images are nearly 100% crops, so the sharpness is not stellar - but it is very fascinating to see the Moon surface so close!

 

002731a - From Ptolemaeus to Maurolycus  Index

 

002731b - From Mare Frigoris to Mare Vaporum

Index

 

002731c - From Ptolemaeus to Maurolycus

Index

 

002731d - From Ptolemaeus to Maurolycus

Index

 

002731e - From Alphonsus to Manzinus

Index

 

002731f - From Mare Frigoris to Mare Vaporum

Index

 

002731g - From Mare Serenitatis to Mare Nectaris

Index

 

002732a - From Mare Humorum to Clavius  Index

 

002733a - Gassendi and Mare Humorum  Index

 

002733b - Oceanus Procellarum  Index