|
Walking
On The Moon
The Moon is by far the most photographed extra-planetary
subject, nevertheless, it is always a fascinating view. With a
photographic setup - long lens, tripod and DSLR camera - it is
impossible to equal the result of high quality telescopes with
equatorial mount and dedicate astrophotography cameras. Moreover,
even the most advanced "terrestrial" setup will never give
the results of the Hubble
Space Telescope - so, why bother taking photos of the Moon?

I don't have any rational answer to this question
;-). The Moon has a "magic" attraction for me and many
other photographers...
The Moon: Some
Info About Our Satellite
The Moon, Earth's only natural satellite, is nearly
one-fourth the size of our planet, with a diameter of 3476
kilometers. The distance between the Earth and the Moon is nearly
384,400 kilometers - to make a comparison, this is nearly 100 times
the distance between New York and Paris. After the Sun, the Moon is
the brightest object in the sky, even though it has an albedo of
just 0.07, i.e., it reflects just the 7% of the sunlight.
The Moon has been object of myths, legend and
observations ever since the prehistoric age. The Greek philosopher Anaxagoras
formulated the first scientific explanation: he thought that both
the Sun and the Moon were giant rocks, and the Moon reflected the
light of the Sun. Until Middle Ages, though, the Moon was considered
a nearly perfect sphere - Galileo, in 1609, was the first to clearly
recognize the craters on the Moon's surface. In the following
centuries, the progresses of optical technology made possible more
detailed observations of the Moon, and many craters were labeled
with the names that they still have today. On the Moon surface there
is no water at liquid state - nevertheless, the darker areas were
called "Mare" (sea), while the brighter ones are called
"Terrae" or continents.
The Moon is in synchronous rotation
with the Earth; in other words, it shows always the same fate
to the Earth. The dark side of the Moon actually is not dark
at all - it receives exactly the same illumination of the
other side but, since it is never seen by the Earth, it
remained "dark", i.e. unknown, to us until 1960,
when it was extensively mapped by the Lunar Orbiter program.
The July 21, 1969, at 02:56 UTC Neil Armstrong
(commander of Apollo 11), moved the first steps on a extra- planetary
body. The Moon was explored by other Apollo mission in the
next years; in December 1972, Eugene Cernan was the last man
to visit the Moon.
The photo on the right shows the surface of
the Moon, photographed by NASA in the Apollo 17 mission. Not
exactly a pretty place - the Moon is an endless desert of grey
rocks, characterized by thousands of craters - with a
terrestrial telescope, it is possible to observe 30,000
craters, and there are many smaller craters that can not be
seen from the Earth. There is no atmosphere and the gravity is one-sixth of the Earth's gravity.
|
|
If you want to know more about the Moon, I'd
recommend to read the Wiki
page about the Moon.
|
|
The Setup :
Working at 1680mm
It is not enough to have a very long lens to take a
good photo of the Moon: you have to solve many issues. Of course,
the focal length is important, but you have to be careful with
teleconverters: they increase the focal length, but they soften the
image and they reduce the brightness of the lens. The 600 f/4 is
easily useable with the 1.4x TC, it becomes more difficult with the
2.0x and it is extremely difficult to use with stacked TCs.
In the Canon
600 f/4 IS review there is a studio test that demonstrates how
stacked TCs have the potential to deliver some more detail than the
bare 2.0x, but in practice the loss of image quality due to motion
blur is often higher than the gain in magnification (remember that with
stacked TCs you have to use an aperture of f/16 to get an acceptable
image quality). To benefit from stacked teleconverters, you have to mount the
lens on a rock solid support: for my photos, I used the Gitzo 1548
CF tripod with Wimberley WH-200 head. Of course, the image stabilization is active (Mode 1), and I use mirror
lock up and self timer (or remote release). Placing a secondary support under the camera
helps to eliminate the vibrations.
The shutter speed and ISO are another fundamental
variable. With fast shutter speeds it is easier to avoid motion
blur; on the
other hand, if you raise too much the ISO sensitivity you get
noisier images, that can not be sharpened as much as low-ISO photos.
For my Moon shots, I used an ISO sensitivities of 200 and 400 to get
a shutter speeds of at least 1/40. This SS is enough to
avoid the blur caused the terrestrial rotation, but it is still very
easy to get blur due to camera vibrations: you have to take many
photos to be sure to get at least one sharp image.
The RAW files had been converted with Adobe
Camera RAW and post-processed with Photoshop CS2; I used the
Smart Sharpen to extract the maximum amount of detail.
|
Juza's Photos
Gallery
Click on the thumbnail to see the photo. These
images are nearly 100% crops, so the sharpness is not stellar - but
it is very fascinating to see the Moon surface so close!
|

|
| 002731a - From Ptolemaeus
to Maurolycus |
Index |
|

|
| 002731b - From Mare
Frigoris to Mare Vaporum |
Index
|
|

|
| 002731c - From
Ptolemaeus to Maurolycus |
Index
|
|

|
| 002731d - From
Ptolemaeus to Maurolycus |
Index
|
|

|
| 002731e - From Alphonsus
to Manzinus |
Index
|
|

|
| 002731f - From Mare
Frigoris to Mare Vaporum |
Index
|
|

|
| 002731g - From Mare
Serenitatis to Mare Nectaris |
Index
|
|
|
| 002732a - From Mare
Humorum to Clavius |
Index |
|
|
| 002733a - Gassendi and
Mare Humorum |
Index |
|

|
| 002733b - Oceanus
Procellarum |
Index |
|